Solvent Extraction Analytical Tests

Analytical and test methods for the characterization of polyethylene and PP are also used for PB, PMP, and polymers of other higher a-olefins. The C-nmr method as well as k and Raman spectroscopic methods are all used to study the chemical stmcture and stereoregularity of polyolefin resins. In industry, polyolefin stereoregularity is usually estimated by the solvent—extraction method similar to that used for isotactic PP. Intrinsic viscosity measurements of dilute solutions in decahn and tetraHn at elevated temperatures can provide the basis for the molecular weight estimation of PB and PMP with the Mark-Houwiok equation, [rj] = KM. The constants K and d for several polyolefins are given in Table 8. 

Extraction/cleanup have been recognized as the most critical steps in any analytical process. Traditional solvent extraction techniques such as solid-liquid and liquid-liquid extractions are still very popular. These techniques are time tested, and analysts are familiar with the processes and procedures. However, they are often time-consuming and labor-intensive, and usually require large volumes of organic solvents. 

Solutions must be concentrated or the constituents must be isolated before trace amounts of the various organics present as complex mixtures in environmental water samples can be chemically analyzed or tested for toxicity. A major objective is to concentrate or isolate the constituents with minimum chemical alteration to optimize the generation of useful information. Factors to be considered in selecting a concentration technique include the nature of the constituents (e.g., volatile, nonvolatile), volume of the sample, and analytical or test system to be used. The principal methods currently in use involve (1) concentration processes to remove water from the samples (e.g., lyophilization, vacuum distillation, and passage through a membrane) and (2) isolation processes to separate the chemicals from the water (e.g., solvent extraction and resin adsorption). Selected methods are reviewed and evaluated. 

Stability of the unextracted swabs is determined in order to allow time for transport of the swabs between swabbing and analytical testing. Standard stability and swab extract stability (after the sample solvent has been added to the swab) are determined to facilitate analytical testing. Swab and extract stability must be assessed after contact with each of the representative product contact surface materials since sample stability can be affected by surface-specific contaminants. In addition, polymeric surfaces may contribute to the background in a low-level assay. 

Two types of analytical tests were run to determine PNA in the fuel and emissions. For both tests, the SASS extracts or fuels were extracted with solvents, followed by silica gel chromatography to isolate a PNA-rich fraction for further analyses. 

Equipment is available that can employ laboratory analytical teclmiques in instruments suited for online monitoring and detection of oily contaminants. These instruments use the principles of solvent extraction, infrared, spot testing, TOC measurement and photometric measurement of visible and ultraviolet adsorbence. They are not subject to interferences from suspended solids, air bubbles, color, oil droplet size, or dissolved solids in the water. 

Sample extraction and cleanup procedures for TLC are similar to those for gas chromatography (GC) and HPLC. If the analyte concentration is sufficiently high, pharmaceutical dosage forms can often be simply dissolved in a solvent that will completely solubilize the analyte and leave excipients or extraneous compounds undissolved to yield a test solution that can be directly spotted for TLC analysis. Grinding of the sample and application of heat and/or sonication may be required to assure solubility of the analyte, as well as filtration or centrifugation to remove undissolved excipients. If the analyte is present in low concentration in a complex sample, solvent extraction, cleanup (purification), and concentration procedures usually precede TLC in order to maximize the analyte and minimize interfering extraneous components in the... 

Table IV shows the results of three laboratory runs of the solvent extraction step (after the plutonium was removed by anion exchange). The major elements are shown before solvent extraction, after solvent extraction, in the 7M HNO wash, and in the final strip product. The americium remaining in the organic after stripping is also shown. Although there were some analytical discrepancies, the data show that americium was effectively recovered (except in Test 1, for which we have no explanation). Americium was decontaminated from aluminum and magnesium in all three runs.

In cases of poisoning, blood and/or urine or tissue samples can be tested for unmetabolized OP.v. A review of available analytical methods and their main characteristics is given in Table 9.3. For the screening methods and for the quantification of single compounds, often GC techniques in combination with various detection methods are used. Furthermore, several HPLC methods have been described. For sample preparation, some authors prefer the traditional liquid-liquid solvent extraction, whereas others use SPE on conventional materials. In addition to these, novel techniques such as SPME or SPMEM are also used. 

Immunoassay techniques rely upon synthetic antibodies that have been developed to form a complex with petroleum substances. The antibodies in the test kit are immobilised on the walls of a special cell or membrane. Water samples can be added directly, whereas soils are solvent extracted into a suitable water miscible solvent and added to the cell. A known amount of enzyme with an affinity for the antibody is added. After equilibrium is established, the cell is washed to remove any unreacted material. Colour development reagents which react with the enzyme are added. A solution that stops colour development is also added at a specific time, and the optical density is then measured. Samples showing high optical density (colour intensity) contain low concentrations of analytes. Concentration is inversely proportional to optical density. Kits are generally available for, among others, TPH, BTEX and PAH. A correction factor supplied by the manufacturer is used to calculate TPH and this is subject to variation depending on the product type. These tests do not provide information on product type and have limitations dependent upon soil type and homogeneity. Also, field extraction techniques are not as efficient as laboratory-based extraction techniques. 

Trivalent monomethylated and dimethylated arsenic species have also been reported in lake water (58,68,69). These arsenicals are probably methylarsonous acid and dimethylarsinous acid, although their precise chemical structures in natural waters have not been demonstrated. Most analytical methods for determining arsenic species in water samples convert the original arsenic species into volatile hydrides, which then serve as the analytes. Since the trivalent methylated arsenicals generate the same analyte as their respective pentavalent analogues, they must be separated before the hydride generation step so that they can be determined independently. Solvent extraction has been used to effect this separation (58). Possibly, the presence of these trivalent methylated arsenicals has been underestimated because few studies include a solvent separation step. However, in one smdy at least, dimethylarsenic in estuarine and coastal waters, as determined by hydride generation techniques, was shown to be present solely as the pentavalent dimethylarsinate species in three out of the four samples tested (50). 

Many plant metabolites marketed as natural pesticides are in fact more toxic than their synthesized competitors for example, rotenone (extracted from the roots of certain members of the bean plant family) has been used as a crop insecticide since the mid-19th century to control leafeating caterpillars, but is six times more toxic to mammals on a strictly comparable basis than carbaryl, a synthetic chemical also effective for caterpillar control. Nicotine sulfate is extracted from tobacco by steam distillation or solvent extraction and has been used as a pesticide since the early 20th century it is six times more toxic than diazinon, a widely available synthetic insecticide sold for control of many of the same pests. The best known work in this area (Ames 1990, 1990a, 1997) used the Ames test (Ames 1973, 1973a) to compare potencies of natural and synthetic pesticide compounds with respect to mutagenicity in special bacterial strains. While some of the conclusions of this work are controversial (Tomatis 2001), it does at least emphasize the importance of development of analytical methods for natural as well as synthetic compounds in foodstuffs. In this section an example of each is considered. 

Organic solvent For analytes without ionizable groups, the partition coefficient is determined by the organic solvent selected. The solvent should be water-immiscible, highly immobilized in the pores of the hollow fiber, and have an excellent GC behavior. It should provide an adequate selectivity and high extraction recoveries. A variety of solvents with different polarity and water solubility should be tested. For highly hydrophilic analytes (in their neutral form), LPME is not the extraction technique of choice. 

---