Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solubility, phase-selective

Anionic and neutral polymers are usually analyzed successfully on Syn-Chropak GPC columns because they have minimal interaction with the appropriate mobile-phase selection however, cationic polymers adsorb to these columns, often irreversibly. Mobile-phase selection for hydrophilic polymers is similar to that for proteins but the solubilities are of primary importance. Organic solvents can be added to the mobile phase to increase solubility. In polymer analysis, ionic strength and pH can change the shape of the solute from mostly linear to globular therefore, it is very important to use the same conditions during calibration and analysis of unknowns (8). Many mobile phases have been used, but 0.05-0.2 M sodium sulfate or sodium nitrate is common. [Pg.316]

Selective transfer of material in microgram to gram quantities between two immiscible liquid phases separations based on solubility differences selectivity achieved by pH control and complexation. [Pg.49]

II reaction under similar conditions at temperatures between 80 and 100°C and with a four-fold excess of 2-methylpentanal (to compensate for the low solubility), the selectivity for the Aldol II product (80%) was 20% higher in [BMIMJEF NaOH than in the water/NaOH system, both at 100% propanal conversion. The increased selectivity was attributed to the higher solubility of the reactant 2-methylpentanal in the ionic liquid phase than in the water phase. The higher solubility of 2-methylpentanal effectively suppressed the self-aldol condensation in the ionic liquid. [Pg.201]

Lin, H. et al.. Solubility of selected dibasic carboxylic acid in water, in ionic liquid of [Bmim][BF4], and in aqueous [BmimHBFJ solutions. Fluid Phase Equilib., 253, 130, 2007. [Pg.66]

Activities of tri-n-butylammonium and tri-n-butylphosphonium ions with two different spacer chain lengths are compared in Table 8 1I8). The greater activity of the phosphonium ions is opposite to what has been reported for analogous soluble phase transfer catalysts119). Activities of the catalysts bound to silica gel were as high as activities of soluble catalysts adsorbed to silica gel118). Without some independent determination of the role of intraparticle diffusion it is not possible to determine whether the reduced activity of the adsorbed catalysts is due to lower intrinsic activity at the silica gel surface or to diffusional limitations. The size selectivity for alkyl bromides suggests that intraparticle diffusion was not a problem. [Pg.81]

In GC, the mobile phase acts only as a carrier. In LC, solute undergoes interaction with liquids or mixtures of liquids used as the mobile phase. Selection of the mobile phase is critical. The most useful criteria are the solubility parameter concept, Snyder s selectivity triangle, and solva-tochromic parameters. [Pg.7]

Kossena, G.A. et al. (2003) Separation and characterization of the colloidal phases produced on digestion of common formulation lipids and assessment of their impact on the apparent solubility of selected poorly water-soluble drugs . Pharm. Sci., 92 634-648. [Pg.252]

In order to assess the relative increase in solubility of a metastable solid phase with respect to another, a simple solubility ratio can be defined. Here the solubility ratio is defined as the value for the higher solubility phase divided by the lower. Table 3 contains a selected list of solubility ratios for different solid phases of a selected list of example drugs. [Pg.3314]

The most important criterion for solvent selection is throughput, which mainly depends on a sufficient solubility of the solutes and the corresponding selectivity of the separation. Because solubility and selectivity depend on the interaction between the three elements of the chromatographic system, the selection of the mobile phase dependent on these parameters is further discussed in Section 4.3. [Pg.115]

Kossena GA, Boyd BJ, Porter CJH, and Charman WN. Separation and Characterization of the Colloidal Phases Produced on Digestion of Common Formulation Lipids and Assessment of their Impact on the Apparent Solubility of Selected Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. J Pharm Sci 2003 92 634-648. [Pg.173]

The possibility to run reactions in a homogeneous fashion is one of the attractive features of solution phase synthesis techniques over the conceptually related solid phase synthesis techniques. However, the incorporation of fluorous chains to permit molecules to partition into a fluorous phase naturally begins to alter the solubility properties of the resulting fluorinated organic molecules. Indeed, molecules with very large fluorous domains can have little or no solubility in many common organic solvents. Thus, solubility and selection of a reaction solvent are crucial considerations in designing fluorous reactions or reactions sequences. [Pg.99]

The specific chemical interactions from the stationary phase have been approached in the same manner. Snyder (95) first proposed that the three types of bonded phases should provide maximum differences in selectivity. He assigned the amino-phase to group I, the cyano- phase to group VI, and the diol-phase to group IV. Cooper and Smith (98,99) have extensively studied the three common types of normal-phase, bonded-phase columns and, using extended solubility parameters, have experimentally located the three columns on a stationary-phase selectivity triangle, shown in Fig. 20. Both the amino-phase and the cyano-phase fall near the predictions however, the diol-phase shows significantly less... [Pg.151]

The choice of reverse phase packing material will depend on the amount of information available on the component of interest and on other sample components. Initial tests such as solvent partitioning behavior, solubility m various solvents, and others see Chapter 1) can be used to estimate polarity and hence be of use in initial column/mobile phase selection. The most retentive of the silica-based reverse phase supports, Cl8 and C8, are a sensible first choice, as the retention of polar compounds is maximized, while the retention of nonpolar materials can be easily modulated by choice of eluent. If the compound of interest is very nonpolar (or the sample contains components that bind very strongly to retentive phases such as C8/C18), a shorter chain alkyl-bonded phase such as C6 or C4 may be more suitable. [Pg.176]

In spite of this critical note, the potential of SFC in analytical and preparative-scale enan-tioseparations has been already illustrated. Technical development in this field may open even more challenges for this technique. The advantage of SFC for preparative separations is that the high-pressure liquid carbon dioxide used as mobile phase can easily be removed from the product. In addition, carbon dioxide is non-hazardous and relatively inexpensive. On the other hand, this mobile phase creates the following problems the solubility of polar compounds is limited, and alcohols or other polar modifiers have to be used. Although this makes the technical advantage of SFC questionable, the method may offer some advantages for chiral compounds that may dissolve in SFC mobile phases. Selected examples of preparative SFC enantioseparations are summarized in Table 10 [168-171]. [Pg.164]

Soluble polymers also can be separated by liquid/liquid separations. These liquid/liquid separations can involve membrane filtrations that use to advantage the relative size differences of macromolecules and low molecular weight substrates. Alternatively, the physical size or the phase-selective solubility of macromolecules can be used to advantage, separating a solution of a macro-molecule-bound ligand or catalyst from a low molecular weight product on the basis of size or phase-selective solubility (Fig. 2). [Pg.116]

Soluble polymers can be used in a variety of ways in liquid/liquid systems. An approach originally developed in our group concerned polar polymers in liquid/liquid systems whose miscibility changes with temperature. The first of these so-called thermomorphic liquid/liquid systems studied used polar polymers like poly(AT-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) or poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) [151]. Experiments using the dye-labeled PNIPAM (110) or PEO (111) where the dye served as a surrogate for a catalytic species, showed that these polymers had excellent (>500 1) phase-selective solubility in the polar phase of an equivolume thermomorphic mixture of heptane and 90% aqueous ethanol. [Pg.152]

Since polymers like 110 or 111 are phase-selectively soluble in the polar phase of a polar/nonpolar biphasic mixture cold and still soluble when the solvent mixture is heated to miscibility, polymers like 77 or 81 can be used as recoverable, recyclable allylic substitution, Heck, or hydrogenation catalysts in Eq. 48, Eq. 49, or 50, respectively. [Pg.153]

Poly(4-ferf-butylstyrene) is an alternative to polystyrene that can be prepared by radical polymerization of a commercial monomer. While poly(4-ferf-butylstyrene) (PtBS) has received limited attention as a component in block copolymers [64], PtBS homopolymers have not generally been used as supports, presumably because they offer no advantages in separation if separation involves solvent precipitation chemistry. PtBS heptane solubility does make it useful in liquid/liquid biphasic separations. PtBS and other alkylated polystyrenes are otherwise similar to polystyrene and such heptane solubility under biphasic separation conditions is a general strategy for separation and recovery of species bound to these polystyrene-like polymers. A version of this polymer support suitable for catalyst immobilization (120) can be prepared by radical copolymerization with chloromethylstyrene as a comonomer (Eq. 58). This alkylated polystyrene is highly phase-selectively soluble in heptane when another polar phase like DMF or 90% aqueous ethanol is present, but is soluble in miscible mixtures of heptane with these polar solvents at 70 °C. [Pg.157]

A latent biphasic system is a miscible solvent mixture that will become biphasic by the addition of a small amount of an additive. For example, a mixture of 10 mL of heptane, 9.2 mL of ethanol, and 0.8 mL of water would be miscible near room temperature. However, addition of a small amount (200 ]iL) of water or the addition of some salt would make this mixture biphasic. Such solvent mixtures that are at the cusp of immiscibility are useful as homogeneous media for catalysis and, after perturbation, as biphasic systems for separation. If a soluble polymer-immobilized catalyst is present that is by design phase-selectively soluble in one or the other phases of the biphasic mixture, it is possible to design recoverable reusable homogeneous catalysts with such latent biphasic systems. [Pg.161]

Our work on latent biphasic systems has focused on linear polymers [165]. Initially these studies focused on poly(JV-alkylacrylamide)s like PNODAM because we had earlier shown that these lipophilic materials are very phase-selectively soluble in heptane [158,165]. This initial work used the PNODAM-bound SCS-Pd catalyst 116 in a DMA-heptane mixture with iodobenzene and acrylic acid as substrates and triethylamine as a base. This catalyst mixture was initially homogeneous at 25 On heating, Heck chemistry occurred to form cinnamic acid. Subsequent cooling of this reaction mixture formed a biphasic mixture even without addition of water because the reaction had formed some triethyl ammonium iodide, and this ammonium salt functioned as the perturbant. [Pg.162]


See other pages where Solubility, phase-selective is mentioned: [Pg.330]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.1373]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.4074]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.809]    [Pg.2006]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.166]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.116 ]




SEARCH



Phase selection

Phase selectivity

Selective solubility

Solubility selectivity

© 2024 chempedia.info