Soil removal particulate

In the thermal desorption technique excavated soil is heated to around 200 to 1000°F (93 to 538°C). Volatile and some semivolatile contaminants are vaporized and carried off by air, combustion gas, or inert gas. Off-gas is typically processed to remove particulates. Volatiles in the off-gas may be burned in an afterburner, collected on activated carbon, or recovered in condensation equipment. Thermal desorption systems are physical separation processes that are not designed to provide high levels of organic destruction, although some systems will result in localized oxidation or pyrolysis. 

The System 64MT low-temperature thermal desorption (LTTD) system is a commercially available ex situ thermal desorption technology. This system uses a countercurrent flow rotary drier to heat soils contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to temperatures sufficient to cause contaminants to volatilize and physically separate from the soU. Filter bags remove particulate matter and afterbumers/oxidizers are used to destroy organic constituents that remain in the filtered airstream. 

The size ranges of some filter types used to remove particulate materials from natural waters are also shown in Fig. 10.1. The standard 0.45 /zm-membrane filter clearly has pores too large to filter out many colloidal-sized materials, which can include metal oxyhydroxides, clays, and viruses. Removal of colloidal-sized particles by filtration often takes place, however, when soil water or... 

Anionic and nonionic surfactants can reduce the work required to remove solid particles. This is because these surfactants adsorb to hair or hydrophobic soils with their hydrophobic tails in contact with the hydrophobic surfaces and their hydrophilic heads oriented toward the bulk solution. This has the effect of reducing ypw and ypw and, thus, Wa. Even more importandy, anionic surfactants remove particulates as a result of the increase of negative potentials on soil and hair upon anionic adsorption to these surfaces. This increases mutual repulsion between particulate and fiber, thus facilitating soil removal. 

The ease of removing particulate soil from the hair surface is also dependent upon particle size. As size decreases, the surface area per unit weight of the particle, and consequently the area of actual contact per unit weight between particle and substrate, increases. As a result, more force per unit area is required to remove the particle [120], In a normal cleaning process, particulates that are less than 0.1 tun in size cannot be effectively removed from fibrous substrates [121]. 

Particulate Soil Removal of particulate solid soil by aqueous baths is accomplished by the following mechanisms ... 

Since the adsorption of nonionics onto soil or substrate does not significantly increase its electrical potential at the Stem layer, this mechanism of soil removal is probably not a major one for nonionics, and nonionics are generally not as effective as anionics for the removal of particulate soil (Albin, 1973). On the other hand, they appear to be very effective for producing steric barriers (see below) for the prevention of soil redeposition. 

Incineration involves the heating (either directly or indirectly) of excavated soil to temperatures of 880-1200 °C to destroy or detoxify contaminants. Incineration can also be used for the treatment of contaminated liquids and sludges. Incineration results in the destruction of the soil texture and removes all natural humic components. The residues may also have high heavy metal contents. Exhaust gasses need to be treated to remove particulates and any harmful combustion products. A range of methods of incineration are available although the use of rotary kilns is probably the most widespread. Costs of treatment are heavily dependent on the water content of the material being treated and any calorific value that the material may have. 

Particulate soils arise from dust, dirt, soot, hydrocarbons, metal oxides and even from hair products based on materials such as silicas or aluminas from about 1pm to less than 0.1-pm particle size see Figure 5-3. The removal of particulate soil is not controlled by the hydrophilicity of the fiber surface. Particulate soil removal depends on the bonding of the particle to the surface, the location of the particle [14], and the size of the particle. Particle size is perhaps the most critical variable for the removal of particulates. As the particle size decreases, the area of contact with the fiber increases, making it more difficult to remove from the hair. At particle sizes of less than 0.1 pm, it is very difficult to remove material from hair surfaces by ordinary shampooing [15]. When the soil particle consists of nonpolar components, its adhesion depends mainly on Van der Waals forces (e.g., waxes or polymeric resins and dimethicone polymers and the molecular size and shape are critical to their removal). Unless very high molecular weights are involved, the removal of such soils is oftentimes easier than for cationic polymers where adhesive binding includes a combination of ionic and Van der Waals forces. 

Published literature regarding the efficacy of anionic surfactant systems for removing particulate soils such as soot and hydrocarbons could not be found. As indicated earlier, as particle size decreases below about 1 pm, the resistance to removal should increase and become increasingly difficult. 

Current research at The University of Tennessee In protective apparel for pesticide applicators has Investigated decontamination, penetration and user preference for protective apparel. The decontamination studies found pesticides behaved similarly to soil removal, with oily based soils being more difficult to remove from synthetic fabrics and particulate soil being more difficult to remove from woven natural fabrics. Initial studies on the effect of fabric finishes on pesticide penetration found a fluorocarbon finish was most effective. There was, however, an Increase in penetration with Increased launderings of the finished fabric. In a survey of user preference of available garments, cost was the predominant factor affecting choice, ranking above either safety or comfort. 

Uses Detergent assistant soap builder particulate soil dispersant scale inhibitor/deposit control agent in water treatment, soil removal antiredeposition aid in detergents and cleaners sequestrant for calcium, magnesium, iron for textile use for laundry, dishwash, consumer/institu-tional cleaning prods. food pkg. adhesives, coatings, paper Reguiatory FDA 21 CFR 175.105,175.300,175.320,175.390,176.180 ... 

Hot-Mix Process. In the hot-mix process, the aggregate (soil) is dried at temperatures ranging from 150 to 315°C (300 to 600°F) to remove moisture. The drier is akin to the rotary driers used in thermal desorption and typically includes air pollution control systems to remove particulates and organics from the off-gases. After drying, the soil is then mixed with hot liquid asphalt. The product cures, or hardens, as it cools. 

---