Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Site transport

Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 and ACoP L22 Control of Substances Hazardous to Health 2002 Noise at Work Regulations 1989 [Pg.220]

Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996 Road Traffic Acts [Pg.220]

Controlled Waste (Registration of Carriers and Seizure of Vehicles) Regulations 1991 [Pg.220]

The site must be surveyed and vehicle routes planned to avoid danger to pedestrians, contact with buildings, structures or overhead power lines, and to be clear of excavations. Vehicles should be subject to a planned maintenance programme. [Pg.220]

Suitable fencing must be provided around excavations. Barriers and notices must be erected at overhead power lines as required by Guidance Note GS6. Vehicle operating areas and traffic routes must be clearly signed and fenced off where practicable. Stop boards will be fitted to excavations where tipping is to take place. Drivers must ensure loads are placed evenly in vehicles and that the vehicle is not overloaded. Drivers must not remain in or on vehicles being loaded or unloaded. Tipping vehicles will not move with the body raised. [Pg.220]


For off-site transportation, the phosphoms is loaded into railcars for transfer to the sites where it is used directly as a raw material or burned and hydrated to phosphoric acid. During shipping, the phosphoms is allowed to soHdify in the cars. The railcars are commonly double walled with a jacket that can be heated with steam or hot water so that the phosphoms can be remelted on-site for transloading to local storage tanks. For overseas shipping, tanktainers with reinforced superstmcture for safe handling are used. Formerly, full tanker ships were in use. [Pg.352]

Pesticides can be transported away from the site of appHcation either in the atmosphere or in water. The process of volatili2ation that transfers the pesticide from the site of appHcation to the atmosphere has been discussed in detail (46). The off-site transport and deposition can be at scales ranging from local to global. Once the pesticide is in the atmosphere, it is subject to chemical and photochemical processes, wet deposition in rain or fog, and dry deposition. [Pg.222]

These points have important functional implications. While neuronal glutamate may come from glucose via pyruvate, the Krebs cycle and transamination of alpha-oxoglutamate, it seems likely that most of the transmitter originates from the deamination of glutamine. After release, the high-affinity uptake sites (transporters)... [Pg.211]

A hazardous waste transporter is any person engaged in the off-site transportation of hazardous waste within the United States, if such transportation requires a manifest. Off-site transportation of hazardous waste includes shipments from a hazardous waste generator s facility property to another facility for treatment, storage, or disposal. Regulated off-site transportation includes shipments of hazardous waste by air, rail, highway, or water. [Pg.448]

Transporter regulations apply only to the off-site transport of hazardous waste. They do not apply to the on-site transportation of hazardous waste within a facility s property or boundary. On-site refers to geographically contiguous properties, even if the properties are separated by a public road. Consequently, a facility may ship wastes between two properties without becoming subject to the hazardous waste transporter regulations, provided that the properties are contiguous. [Pg.448]

Transporter requirements do apply to shipments between noncontiguous properties that require travel on public roads. Examples of such on-site transportation include generators and TSDFs transporting waste within their facilities, or on their own property. [Pg.448]

The CERCLA reauthorization regards off-site transport and disposal without treatment as the least favored alternative where practicable treatment technologies are available. It also favors the use of permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies and using them to the maximum extent practicable. [Pg.591]

Surface water control is necessary to minimize contamination of surface waters, to prevent surface water infiltration, and to prevent off-site transport of surface waters that have been contaminated. Control of run-on and runoff will accomplish the following ... [Pg.612]

Off-site landfill is not desirable, because it faces more problems associated with off-site transportation. Other off-site treatment and disposal, such as incineration or other waste treatment methods performed off site, are also not attractive, because they are not the on-site permanent... [Pg.640]

Because of the potentially large amounts of reagents and additives that need to be transported to the site, transportation costs may limit economic feasibility if a source of chemicals is regionally unavailable (D12572E, p. 2). [Pg.616]

Does not require excavation or off-site transport of contaminated material. [Pg.760]

The total treatment cost was estimated to range from 2,843,534 to 4,913,308. This estimate does not include off-site transport and disposal. Off-site disposal, if required, could significantly increase the cost of using this technology (D10246V, p. 5). [Pg.1000]

If off-site transport of energetics is not permitted, the second option is on-site disposal. If this is done in the modified baseline process, they would be incinerated in a DFS with a dedicated PAS, similar to the one in the baseline system. [Pg.33]

Obtaining approvals for off-site transport might cause delays. If the destruction of energetics must be completed by the CWC deadline, PMCD should set a date by which construction of the DFS must be started if no off-site permit has been received or if the receiving facility does not have a valid permit. A permit for DFS construction should be relatively easy to obtain because of its successful use at both JACADS and TOCDF. However, enough time must be allowed in the schedule for permit application and approval. In view of the opposition to incineration by some Pueblo stakeholders, the prompt receipt of a DFS permit cannot be assumed. [Pg.33]

Finding 3-1. The Army has not determined when a commitment to an on-site deactivation furnace system as part of a modified baseline process at Pueblo must be made if a permit for the off-site transport of energetics has not been received. [Pg.34]

Recommendation 3-1. The Army should develop a process and schedule to determine when a decision must be made between the off-site transport of energetics or their on-site disposal in a deactivation furnace system. To avoid schedule delays, the decision mechanism must account for uncertainties in the permitting process. [Pg.34]

One of the examples given above involves off-site shipment. If there is some likelihood of off-site transport being permitted, then this remains a viable option. But a date for the permitting decision should be determined, after which this option should no longer be considered viable. One of the functions of preproject planning is to identify these issues before it is too late. [Pg.41]

Internal transport costs for intermediates are calculated analogous to distribution costs and are allocated to the receiving site. For intermediates produced at the destination site transport costs are assumed to be zero. [Pg.97]

Transport site Activator site Transport site Activator site Hypoxanthine carrier II... [Pg.141]

Storage, use, processing, handling, and on-site transportation of flammable and combustible gases, liquids, and solids... [Pg.634]

Let us first consider the catalyst/polyolefin particle in the early stage of its evolution. The particle consists of the solid catalyst carrier with catalyst sites immobilized on its surface, polymer phase, and pores. The first-principle-based meso-scopic model of particle evolution has to be capable of describing the formation of polymer at catalyst sites, transport of monomer(s) and other re-actants/diluents through the polymer and pore space, and deformation of the polymer and catalyst carrier (including its fragmentation). Similar discrete element modeling techniques have been applied previously to different problems (Heyes et al., 2004 Mikami et al., 1998 Tsuji et al., 1993). [Pg.182]

Since programs in this sphere imply moving a large quantity of SNF a great distance, and brings SNF to geographic areas that are more accessible than most naval sites, transportation must be given particular attention. [Pg.243]


See other pages where Site transport is mentioned: [Pg.136]    [Pg.1146]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.1728]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.2474]    [Pg.692]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.54]   


SEARCH



Approaches to achieve plant transportability and rapid site assembly

Chemical SC scheme with highlighted inter-site transports

Fixed-site carriers membranes facilitated transport

Glucose transporter substrate-binding site

Membrane transport single-site

Modeling Chlorinated Ethene Fate and Transport at a Contaminated Site on Dover Air Force Base

Monoamine transporter binding site affinity

Nickel Transport and Enzyme Active Site Assembly

Oxidation, aerobic, site electron transport

Plant siting and layout transportation

Site selection transport

Transport calcium sites

Transport on site

Transport site hopping

Transport sites, generation

Transport to Storage Site

Transportation site descriptions

© 2024 chempedia.info