Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Separation techniques, survey

There have been a large number of electron spin resonance (ESR) studies of coal and coal products,(1J but a microscopic interpretation of the resulting data has been hampered by the chemical heterogeneity of the coal samples examined. While several surveys of specially selected macerals have appeared, 3), the recent evolution of maceral separation techniques - now allows detailed ESR observations to be made on coals systematically fractionated in which coal rank, maceral type, and maceral density are simultaneously distinguished. The present report surveys the behavior of a variety of ESR properties of carbon radicals in exinite, vitrinite, and inertinite macerals in a variety of coals of different rank. These data... [Pg.124]

As previously mentioned, a wealth of different separation techniques could be described under the term ion chromatography. Therefore, what follows is a survey of the criteria for selecting stationary phases and detectors being suitable for solving a specific separation problem. [Pg.9]

A survey of membrane separation techniques and the applied external driving forces is given in Fig. 1, in which the mean pore diameter of the membranes and the particle size are compared with the respective separation process. [Pg.284]

Milshtein L. M., Boiko S. I., Zaporogez E. P., Oil-gas-field separation techniques (Handbook) (Ed. Md shtein L. M.), Nedra, Moscow, 1992 (in Russian). Gorechenkov V. G., et al., The condition and perspectives of development of absorption processes at gas clearing, Gas Industry, Survey... [Pg.40]

Schweitzer, P.A. (ed.) (1979) Handbook of Separation Techniques for Chemical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York. A survey of the techniques used in separating chemicals with the majority of space being devoted to the sort of processes which might be met in solvent recovery. [Pg.414]

Several high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation techniques have been used in combination with different detection methods to characterize poly(ethylene glycol)s and their amphiphilic derivatives. SEC is a particularly attractive analytical tool for the investigation of non-ionic surfactants because it can provide information for their composition, molecular weight, and molecular-weight distribution along with their micellization in selective solvents. This entry wiU survey briefly both applications with major emphasis on the choice of the most appropriate eluent and stationary phase. [Pg.1598]

Table 10.1 Survey of separation techniques used in ion chromatography. Table 10.1 Survey of separation techniques used in ion chromatography.
Hyphenated analytical methods provide more complementary information in a shorter time period leading to faster and more reUable results, than data obtained from traditional instmmental methods. The types of analytical instmments that can be joined is very large depending only upon the nondestmction of samples after the initial analytical procedure and the ability of the manufacturer to interface the instmmental techniques. Combinations include separation—separation, separation—identification, and identification—identification techniques (see Analytical methods, survey). [Pg.400]

Separation and detection methods A survey on determination of tin species in environmental samples has been published by Leroy et al. (1998). A more detailed overview of GS-MS methodology has been published by Morabito et al. 1995) and on sample preparation using supercritical fluid extraction has been described by Bayona (1995)- The techniques are now under control, so that routine procedures are available at a relatively low cost (Leroy et al. 1998). [Pg.82]

A survey of the literature with a key phrase tissue residue analysis yielded a distribution of separation and detection techniques as outlined in Table 2. LC with either UV or fluorescence detection was the most common separation and detection technique, representing 61% of the citations. The results are an indication of the maturity of LC as a common, well-understood technique. The second most commonly used technique cited in the literature (13%) was GC with either a mass-selective or electron capture detector. GC is also a mature technology and a good choice owing to the... [Pg.310]

In fact continuous titration belongs to this class, but has already been treated above on the basis of the use of the sensor merely as an end-point indicator of the titration reaction. For the remaining non-separational flow techniques, such a multiplicity of concomitant developments has occured since 1960 that in a survey we must confine ourselves to a more or less personal view based substantially on the information obtained from some important reviews and more specific papers presented at a few recent conferences78 82, or from leaflets offered by commercial instrument manufacturers. The developments are summarized in Table 5.1. [Pg.352]

Flow injection analysis is based on the injection of a liquid sample into a continuously flowing liquid carrier stream, where it is usually made to react to give reaction products that may be detected. FIA offers the possibility in an on-line manifold of sample handling including separation, preconcentration, masking and color reaction, and even microwave dissolution, all of which can be readily automated. The most common advantages of FIA include reduced manpower cost of laboratory operations, increased sample throughput, improved precision of results, reduced sample volumes, and the elimination of many interferences. Fully automated flow injection analysers are based on spectrophotometric detection but are readily adapted as sample preparation units for atomic spectrometric techniques. Flow injection as a sample introduction technique has been discussed previously, whereas here its full potential is briefly surveyed. In addition to a few books on FIA [168,169], several critical reviews of FIA methods for FAAS, GF AAS, and ICP-AES methods have been published [170,171]. [Pg.597]

Level 1 sampling provides a single set of samples acquired to represent the average composition of each stream. This sample set is separated, either in the field or in the laboratory, into solid, liquid, and gas-phase components. Each fraction is evaluated with survey techniques which define its basic physical, chemical, and biological characteristics. The survey methods selected are compatible with a very broad spectrum of materials and have sufficient sensitivity to ensure a high probability of detecting environmental problems. Analytical techniques and instrumentation have been kept as simple as possible in order to provide an effective level of information at minimum cost. Each individual piece of data developed adds a relevant point to the overall evaluation. Conversely, since the information from a given analysis is limited, all the tests must be performed to provide a valid assessment of the sample. [Pg.33]


See other pages where Separation techniques, survey is mentioned: [Pg.91]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.737]    [Pg.741]    [Pg.1044]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.972]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.1144]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.206]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.976 ]




SEARCH



Separation techniques

© 2024 chempedia.info