Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Selectivity stochastic models

As pointed out by Mikhail, both functional and stochastic models must be considered together at all times, as there may be several possible combinations, each representing a possible mathematical model. The functional model describes the physical events using an intelligible system, suitable for analysis. It is linked to physical realities by measurements that are themselves physical operations. In simpler situations, measurements refer directly to at least some elements of the functional model. However, it is not necessary, and often not practical, that all the elements of the model be observable. That is, from practical considerations, direct access to the system may not be possible or in some cases may be very poor, making the selection of the measurements of capital importance. [Pg.23]

Table 8.1 shows the stochastic model solution for the petrochemical system. The solution indicated the selection of 22 processes with a slightly different configuration and production capacities from the deterministic case, Table 4.2 in Chapter 4. For example, acetic acid was produced by direct oxidation of n-butylenes instead of the air oxidation of acetaldehyde. Furthermore, ethylene was produced by pyrolysis of ethane instead of steam cracking of ethane-propane (50-50 wt%). These changes, as well as the different production capacities obtained, illustrate the effect of the uncertainty in process yield, raw material and product prices, and lower product... [Pg.167]

The results of the model considered in this Chapter under uncertainty and with risk consideration, as one can intuitively anticipate, yielded different petrochemical network configurations and plant capacities when compared to the deterministic model results. The concepts of EVPI and VSS were introduced and numerically illustrated. The stochastic model provided good results as the objective function value was not too far from the results obtained using the wait-and-see approach. Furthermore, the results in this Chapter showed that the final petrochemical network was more sensitive to variations in product prices than to variation in market demand and process yields when the values of 0i and 02 were selected to maintain the final petrochemical structure. [Pg.170]

A consequence of a strict stochastic model is that not all B lymphocytes will exhibit allelic exclusion. If the rate of productive rearrangement is sufficiently high, there will be occasional double producers (see related discussion in Part I, Instruction and Selection). On the other hand, if the rate of productive rearrangement is low, there will be few doubles, but many cells will have only non-functional rearrangements. [Pg.36]

In the light of the previous discussion it is quite apparent that a detailed mathematical simulation of the combined chemical reaction and transport processes, which occur in microporous catalysts, would be highly desirable to support the exploration of the crucial parameters determining conversion and selectivity. Moreover, from the treatment of the basic types of catalyst selectivity in multiple reactions given in Section 6.2.6, it is clear that an analytical solution to this problem, if at all possible, will presumably not favor a convenient and efficient treatment of real world problems. This is because of the various assumptions and restrictions which usually have to be introduced in order to achive a complete or even an approximate solution. Hence, numerical methods are required. Concerning these, one basically has to distinguish between three fundamentally different types, namely molecular-dynamic models, stochastic models, and continuous models. [Pg.360]

Recently, Gillespie (2001) introduced an approximate approach, termed the r-leap method, for solving stochastic models. The main idea is the same as in the WP-KMC method. One selects a time increment r that is larger than the microscopic KMC time increment, and multiple molecular bundles of fast events occur. However, one now samples how many times each reaction will be executed from a Poisson rather than a uniform random number distribution. Prototype examples indicate that the r-leap method provides comparable noise with the microscopic KMC when the leap condition is satisfied, i.e., the time increments are such that the populations do not change significantly between time steps. [Pg.34]

At the same time, it is known that, during exploitation of stochastic models, cases that show great difficulty concerning the selection and the choice of some parameters of the models frequently appear. As a consequence, the original models become unattractive for research by simulation. In these cases, the models can be transformed to equivalent models which are distorted but exploitable. The use of stochastic distorted models is also recommended for the models based on stochastic chains or polystocastic processes where an asymptotic behaviour is identified with respect to a process transition matrix of probabilities, process chains evolution, process states connection, etc. The distorted models are also of interest when the stochastic process is not time dependent, as, for example, in the stochastic movement of a marked particle occurring with a constant velocity vector, like in diffusion processes. [Pg.235]

Recently Calderon introduced a surrogate process approximation (SPA) to improve the sampling in calculation of the JE. The scheme is applied to the study of the unravelling of deca-alanine at constant temperature in a steered molecular dynamics simulation. The distribution of the work is approximated by developing a model for the dynamics using a relatively small number of real trajectories in conjunction with stochastic differential equations selected to model the process. The... [Pg.197]

Thomson, D.J. (1987), Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech., 180, 529-556. [Pg.118]

Several approaches have been investigated. Marcotte et al. [40] deduce from the frequency of occurrences of certain words in the abstract whether a paper discusses a certain protein-protein interaction. Shatkay et al. [41] analyze the similarity of direction of different documents by providing models for a scientific topic. They train a stochastic model describing the frequency of occurrences of certain words on a given set of documents based on the scientific topic in question. Then they select related literature based on this model. Other systems go beyond counting words. Some systems invoke rules based on the structure of simple sentences [42], More involved language parsing is performed in [43], [44],... [Pg.619]

Figure 6 Diagram illustrating kth step of the construction of a square king lattice of L X L spins with the stochastic models (SM) method solid circles denote lattice sites already filled with spins ( 1) in preceding steps of the process open circles denote the still empty lattice sites. The linear nature of the buildup construction is achieved by using spiral boundary conditions (i.e., the first spin in a row interacts with the last spin of the preceding row). Whereas all the L uncovered spins (at sites k - L,k — L + 1,..., k - ) determine the transition probability for selecting spin k, the spins in close proximity to k k - 1, k - L, etc.) have the largest effect. The local states method is based on the SM construction. Thus, the transition probabilities for spin k are obtained from a Metropolis Monte Carlo sample by calculating the number of occurrences of the various local states, (a, a) = n k-v k-2 k-L k-L v k-L 2 k-L 3 l- transition probability is jS(cT d ) = (cr, ff)/[ (a = 1,ct) -I- n(a = These transition... Figure 6 Diagram illustrating kth step of the construction of a square king lattice of L X L spins with the stochastic models (SM) method solid circles denote lattice sites already filled with spins ( 1) in preceding steps of the process open circles denote the still empty lattice sites. The linear nature of the buildup construction is achieved by using spiral boundary conditions (i.e., the first spin in a row interacts with the last spin of the preceding row). Whereas all the L uncovered spins (at sites k - L,k — L + 1,..., k - ) determine the transition probability for selecting spin k, the spins in close proximity to k k - 1, k - L, etc.) have the largest effect. The local states method is based on the SM construction. Thus, the transition probabilities for spin k are obtained from a Metropolis Monte Carlo sample by calculating the number of occurrences of the various local states, (a, a) = n <rk> k-v k-2 k-L k-L v k-L 2 k-L 3 l- transition probability is jS(cT d ) = (cr, ff)/[ (a = 1,ct) -I- n(a = These transition...
Malhotra, M. Riebman, A. 1993. Selecting and Implementing Phase Approximations for Semi-Markov Models, Communications in statistics. Stochastic models, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 473-506. [Pg.1453]

Many stochastic models are used in population genetics to describe the effects such as random drift selective force, and mutation pressure (e.g. Karlin McGregor, 1964 Crow Kimura, 1970 Maruyama, 1977). Diffusion models are mostly used, and some of them can be interpreted in terms of the CCS model of chemical reactions. The models are in terms of the probability distribution of gene frequencies. [Pg.194]

The scaling factor, /), is a function of a probability of the worst-case scenario, i.e. Pw = 0.25. The result was also calculated without any scaling (p , = 1). The selected robust optimal solution is closer to the stochastic model solution E(A=0) for smaller and closer to the worst case analysis solution W(A=7Vp) for larger p ,. [Pg.316]

In Section 2, we introduce model identification to interpret dynamic PCA, and find that the selection of the time window length can be accordingly solved with the approach of determination the order of AR model. Identification of a system model may be regarded as confirming the probability distribution of a stochastic process. From this understanding, the principle of information criteria is to select appropriate model structure to maximize the approximate extent between the real probability distribution and the estimated probability distribution based on observation data. Shannon entropy is always used to measure the approximate extent, which is represented as ... [Pg.462]

ABSTRACT The paper deals with the seismic linear response spectrum modification based on a probabilistic approach. The modification improves the correctness of the deterministic seismic analysis of building structures using the response spectrum method. In that case, the structure response depends strongly on computed natural frequencies. The proposed response spectrum modification accounts for uncertainties in response due to uncertainties in frequencies caused by variances of computation model parameters. The response spectrum is modified so, that with a selected probability the given spectral values should not be exceeded. The variance of natural frequency values is obtained by modal analysis of a stochastic model of the structure. [Pg.739]

To carry out the above mentioned, appear diverse types of models that set up methodologies to represent the system (Bause Kritzinger, 2002 Buzacott Shanthikumar, 1993 Fuqua, 2003 Schryver et al, 2012 Zio Pedroni, 2010). Some of these models are mathematical models, stochastic models, deterministic models, simulation models for discrete events, Markov chains, among others. Each of these models, achieve different representation grades of the system, so its correct selection is relevant to accomplish with the desired objectives. On the other hand, each model possesses different requirements of information and development times, since many times is not possible to apply any model to a specific system. [Pg.1915]

There exists an extensive literature on birth-death and migration processes of biological species, of which [4.1-8] is only a small selection. This literature includes stochastic models as well as mean value models. Although there is, of course, some overlap with these models - the approach introduced here contains several important new features ... [Pg.86]

The two sources of stochasticity are conceptually and computationally quite distinct. In (A) we do not know the exact equations of motion and we solve instead phenomenological equations. There is no systematic way in which we can approach the exact equations of motion. For example, rarely in the Langevin approach the friction and the random force are extracted from a microscopic model. This makes it necessary to use a rather arbitrary selection of parameters, such as the amplitude of the random force or the friction coefficient. On the other hand, the equations in (B) are based on atomic information and it is the solution that is approximate. For ejcample, to compute a trajectory we make the ad-hoc assumption of a Gaussian distribution of numerical errors. In the present article we also argue that because of practical reasons it is not possible to ignore the numerical errors, even in approach (A). [Pg.264]


See other pages where Selectivity stochastic models is mentioned: [Pg.112]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.2807]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.2791]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.3492]    [Pg.3499]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.313]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.104 ]




SEARCH



Model selection

Modeling selecting models

Stochastic modeling

Stochastic selection

© 2024 chempedia.info