Scanning electron microscopy electrode surfaces

QCMB RAM SBR SEI SEM SERS SFL SHE SLI SNIFTIRS quartz crystal microbalance rechargeable alkaline manganese dioxide-zinc styrene-butadiene rubber solid electrolyte interphase scanning electron microscopy surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy sulfolane-based electrolyte standard hydrogen electrode starter-light-ignition subtractively normalized interfacial Fourier transform infrared... 

We first experimented with the Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) in order to measure the ablation rate in 1987 (12). The only technique used before was the stylus profilometer which revealed enough accuracy for etch rate of the order of 0.1 pm, but was unable to probe the region of the ablation threshold where the etch rate is expressed in a few A/pulse. Polymer surfaces are easily damaged by the probe tip and the meaning of these measurements are often questionable. Scanning electron microscopy (21) and more recently interferometry (22) were also used. The principle of the QCM was demonstrated in 1957 by Sauerbrey (22) and the technique was developed in thin film chemistiy. analytical and physical chemistry (24). The equipment used in this work is described in previous publications (25). When connected to an appropriate oscillating circuit, the basic vibration frequency (FQ) of the crystal is 5 MHz. When a film covers one of the electrodes, a negative shift <5F, proportional to its mass, is induced ... 

Preparation As compared to single-crystal Ag surfaces, the preparation of pc-Ag electrode may seem to be a relatively simple task. However, a pc-Ag surface, which ensures reproducibility and stabiKty, also requires a special procedure. Ardizzone et al. [2] have described a method for the preparation of highly controlled pc-Ag electrode surface (characterized by electrochemical techniques and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)). Such electrodes, oriented toward elec-trocatalytic properties, were successfully tested in hahde adsorption experiments, using parallelly, single-crystal and conventional pc-Ag rods as references. 

The main inconvenience of the ERDs construction is the lack of reproducibility. Due to the tiny electrode surfaces, small variations imply big changes. The sealing between the electrode surface and the insulator material is very crucial for obtaining a well-defined electrode surface and low noise. Their characterization can be achieved by different techniques [17]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is suitable for UMEs but not for smaller ERDs. Information about ERD dimensions can be obtained from the experimental (by chronoamperometry or cyclic voltammetry) and theoretical response in well-defined electrochemical systems [5]. Moreover, this electrochemical characterization shows several limitations when ERDs approach the low nanometric scale [8,14,36]. 

Electron microscopy56, most commonly employed as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), is now a widely used tool in examining the morphology of surfaces under vacuum conditions, and so in an electrochemical context electrode surfaces and corroded surfaces. Instruments also permit chemical microanalysis to be carried out. 

Scanning electron microscopy is the traditional method for ex situ morphological studies of electrode surfaces. Basically, this is the simplest tool for morphological studies of the electrode. It should be noted, however, that in cases in which the electrodes are covered with electrically insulating films, the resolution of this method is limited, due to static charging of the surface. SEM application for the... 

The chemical diffusivity of lithium ions 0 + in the transition metal oxides and graphite is taken as 10 10 cm s [13, 97-100] on the basis of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) inspections, the average radius R is estimated to be 1-10 pm. The electrochemically active area A a is calculated from the radius R, and the theoretical density of the particles considered assuming that A a is identical to the total surface area of the electrode comprised of the spherical particles. 

Voltammetric Sizing The average size of inert microparticles deposited on an electrode surface has been determined using cyclic voltammetric measurements [45]. This method was proposed to be used for smaller particles (i.e., if optical microscopy is not possible) as an inexpensive alternative solution to scanning electron microscopy (SEM). 

---