Sample risk characterization

Based upon the various sources of adult consumer exposure to organotin compounds (section 6) and the TDI values derived above, it is possible to estimate the relative exposure from the various organotin compounds expressed as a percentage of the TDI values. The exposure calculations in section 6 were based on a realistic worst-case exposure assessment. Table 26 presents the results of this risk characterization. 

Based upon the information in Table 26, it can be seen that the TDI for each organotin is not exceeded for any of the consumer products under investigation. The 

Organotin Neurotoxicity Developmental toxicity Endocrine disruption Immunotoxicity 

Monomethyltin Limited information (based on DMTC NOAEL 0.6 mg/kg body weight per day No data available No data available Limited data thymus weight unaffected at 5 mg/kg body weight per day (as MMTC) 

---

Recommendation 4-2. The Army should define the quantity and characteristics of anticipated nonprocess waste streams and evaluate options for the final disposition of each type of waste. On-site processes should be developed and demonstrated for treating all agent-contaminated wastes. Methods of representative sampling and characterization of wastes should be developed to verify that treated wastes are free of agent to below appropriate risk thresholds. 

Data collection and evaluation involves characterization of the concentration of contaminants in the media (e.g., soil, groundwater, and air) at the site in question. It includes the collection of samples to characterize soil and groundwater at contaminated property. This phase of a risk assessment may be complex and require significant resources but it is critical to providing the data needed to support the exposure assessment. 

For risk characterization, the upper limit of 90% confidence interval of the measured concentrations, i.e., 95th percentile are to be used as a worst case. The reasons for this assumption include first the fact that the rivers where samples were collected are located in the Kanto region with many industrial plants. Secondly, the... 

When conducting risk characterization, what are some important considerations for collecting soil samples ... 

Employees who are exposed to nanoaerosols should have adequate protection against nanoparticle exposure. The best option is exhaust by hood conventional dust masks may not be as effective as expected. At this moment, there is no legal standard that sets the occupational exposure threshold. The development of risk assessment of exposure to nanoaerosol has been limited by the lack of standard methods and compact instrumentation for long-term monitoring. Accurate risk assessment requires advanced nanoaerosol sampling and characterization techniques for the analysis of both physical and chemical properties of nanoaerosol. 

Thus, tlie focus of tliis subsection is on qualitative/semiquantitative approaches tliat can yield useful information to decision-makers for a limited resource investment. There are several categories of uncertainties associated with site risk assessments. One is tlie initial selection of substances used to characterize exposures and risk on tlie basis of the sampling data and available toxicity information. Oilier sources of uncertainty are inlierent in tlie toxicity values for each substance used to characterize risk. Additional micertainties are inlierent in tlie exposure assessment for individual substances and individual exposures. These uncertainties are usually driven by uncertainty in tlie chemical monitoring data and tlie models used to estimate exposure concentrations in tlie absence of monitoring data, but can also be driven by population intake parameters. As described earlier, additional micertainties are incorporated in tlie risk assessment when exposures to several substances across multiple patliways are suimned. 

Analytical chemistry is a critical component of worker safety, re-entry, and other related studies intended to assess the risk to humans during and subsequent to pesticide applications. The analytical aspect takes on added significance when such studies are intended for submission to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and/or other regulatory authorities and are thus required to be conducted according to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Standards, or their equivalent. This presentation will address test, control, and reference substance characterization, use-dilution (tank mix) verification, and specimen (exposure matrix sample) analyses from the perspective of GLP Standards requirements. 

Monte Carlo—A statistical technique commonly used to quantitatively characterize the uncertainty and variability in estimates of exposure or risk. The analysis uses statistical sampling techniques to obtain a probabilistic approximation to the solution of a mathematical equation or model. 

The determination of inorganic compounds in water samples provides significant data for risk assessment in aquatic environments and for characterizing the chemical quality of water. The presence of inorganic chemicals in water is due to both natural processes and human activities. Most of these... 

Such a procedure carries the risk of underestimating the toxicity of investigated substances with regard to an entire ecosystem. It is important that toxicity tests be conducted simultaneously with several bioindicators, that is, with a battery of bioassays characterized by different sensitivities and representing different trophic levels.19 Such an approach is often applied in research on environmental samples, which are usually complex mixtures of compounds with unknown physicochemical properties. 

---