Mass spectrometry samples identification

If we consider only a few of the general requirements for the ideal polymer/additive analysis techniques (e.g. no matrix interferences, quantitative), then it is obvious that the choice is much restricted. Elements of the ideal method might include LD and MS, with reference to CRMs. Laser desorption and REMPI-MS are moving closest to direct selective sampling tandem mass spectrometry is supreme in identification. Direct-probe MS may yield accurate masses and concentrations of the components contained in the polymeric material. Selective sample preparation, efficient separation, selective detection, mass spectrometry and chemometric deconvolution techniques are complementary rather than competitive techniques. For elemental analysis, LA-ICP-ToFMS scores high. 

These results show that, depending on the lipid substances present in a sample, direct mass spectrometry may allow the identification of all the lipid substances present in a material, in particular when their mass spectral fingerprints do not overlap, or to determine the main molecular constituents still preserved in the sample. 

One common method that will not be considered here is two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins prior to protein identification. This topic has been extensively reviewed elsewhere (2). Furthermore, this chapter will not attempt to review the different instruments available to analyze the samples using mass spectrometry. Some instruments are capable of analyzing proteins directly (for example, MS analysis using a MALDI-based platform) and others analyze peptides (for example, LC MS/MS), derived from endogenous proteins by the action of proteases. The protease employed is very often, but not exclusively, trypsin and the analysis of the peptides allows the parent protein to be identified. 

Identification of stmctures of toxic chemicals in environmental samples requires to use modern analytical methods, such as gas chromatography (GC) with element selective detectors (NPD, FPD, AED), capillary electrophoresis (CE) for screening purposes, gas chromatography/mass-spectrometry (GC/MS), gas chromatography / Fourier transform infra red spectrometry (GC/FTIR), nucleai magnetic resonance (NMR), etc. 

Spark Source Mass Spectrometry (SSMS) is a method of trace level analysis—less than 1 part per million atomic (ppma)—in which a solid material, in the form of two conducting electrodes, is vaporized and ionized by a high-voltage radio frequency spark in vacuum. The ions produced from the sample electrodes are accelerated into a mass spectrometer, separated according to their mass-to-charge ratio, and collected for qualitative identification and quantitative analysis. 

Other methods of identification include the customary preparation of derivatives, comparisons with authentic substances whenever possible, and periodate oxidation. Lately, the application of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy has provided an elegant approach to the elucidation of structures and stereochemistry of various deoxy sugars (18). Microcell techniques can provide a spectrum on 5-6 mg. of sample. The practicing chemist is frequently confronted with the problem of having on hand a few milligrams of a product whose structure is unknown. It is especially in such instances that a full appreciation of the functions of mass spectrometry can be developed. 

Knowledge of the identity of phenolic compounds in food facilitates the analysis and discussion of potential antioxidant effects. Thus studies of phenolic compounds as antioxidants in food should usually by accompanied by the identification and quantification of the phenols. Reversed-phase HPLC combined with UV-VIS or electrochemical detection is the most common method for quantification of individual flavonoids and phenolic acids in foods (Merken and Beecher, 2000 Mattila and Kumpulainen, 2002), whereas HPLC combined with mass spectrometry has been used for identification of phenolic compounds (Justesen et al, 1998). Normal-phase HPLC combined with mass spectrometry has been used to identify monomeric and dimeric proanthocyanidins (Lazarus et al, 1999). Flavonoids are usually quantified as aglycones by HPLC, and samples containing flavonoid glycosides are therefore hydrolysed before analysis (Nuutila et al, 2002). 

PLC is used for separations of 2 to 5 mg of sample on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates (0.25-nun layer thickness) or high-performance TLC (HPTLC) plates (0.1-mm thickness). In these instances, the method is termed micropreparative TLC. The isolation of one to five compounds in amounts ranging from 5 to 1000 mg is carried out on thicker layers. PLC is performed for isolation of compounds to be used in other tasks, i.e., further identification by various analytical methods, such as ultraviolet (UV) solution spectrometry [1] or gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) [2], obtaining analytical standards, or investigations of chemical or biological properties [3]. 

Identification. One compound isolated by TLC was found to be very inhibitory to morningglory seed germination and was identified using mass spectrometry. A LKB 2091 GC-MS was used for GC-MS analysis. In addition to GC-MS, the sample was also analyzed by direct probe. 

To assure consistency and speed in multidisciplinary structure analysis of low-MW compounds involving various techniques (IR, NMR, MS, etc.) most industrial laboratories use a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). In such schemes IR analysis is frequently used as a cheap filter for a quick starting control and as a means for verification. As IR detects only structural units identification of an unknown compound on the basis of IR is difficult. Mass spectrometry is used as the prime identification tool and is especially important in the determination of the exact mass and gross formulae. While structural prognostication on the basis of MS is difficult for the non-expert, a posteriori interpretation is quite feasible. H NMR is both easy and cheap, however requires greater sample quantities than either... 

Despite these numerous advantages, mass spectrometry has often been used more as an auxiliary, rather than a primary, identification method for additives in polymers, paints, coatings, etc. Nevertheless, mass spectrometry can be used for direct determination of the composition of unknown admixtures. More difficult is the MS examination of substances of low volatility, as the sample has to be introduced in the gas phase. This requires volatilisation, which often leads to fragmentation. 

Thermal-programmed solid insertion probe mass spectrometry (TP-SIP-MS) has been proposed [247,248], in which the solid insertion probe consisting of a water-cooled microfumace enters the mass spectrometer via an airlock. The sample is contained in a small Pyrex tube (i.d. 1 mm, length 20 mm). The TIC trace gives a characteristic evolved gas profile for each compound in a mixture of materials, and the mass spectra associated with each TIC peak give a positive identification of that component as it is vaporised. TP-SIP-MS is appropriate for analysis of small solid particles which are volatile, or produce volatile decomposition products. The technique is a form of evolved gas analysis. 

In an acetone extract from a neoprene/SBR hose compound, Lattimer et al. [92] distinguished dioctylph-thalate (m/z 390), di(r-octyl)diphenylamine (m/z 393), 1,3,5-tris(3,5-di-f-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl)-isocyanurate m/z 783), hydrocarbon oil and a paraffin wax (numerous molecular ions in the m/z range of 200-500) by means of FD-MS. Since cross-linked rubbers are insoluble, more complex extraction procedures must be carried out (Chapter 2). The method of Dinsmore and Smith [257], or a modification thereof, is normally used. Mass spectrometry (and other analytical techniques) is then used to characterise the various rubber fractions. The mass-spectral identification of numerous antioxidants (hindered phenols and aromatic amines, e.g. phenyl-/ -naphthyl-amine, 6-dodecyl-2,2,4-trimethyl-l,2-dihydroquinoline, butylated bisphenol-A, HPPD, poly-TMDQ, di-(t-octyl)diphenylamine) in rubber extracts by means of direct probe EI-MS with programmed heating, has been reported [252]. The main problem reported consisted of the numerous ions arising from hydrocarbon oil in the recipe. In older work, mass spectrometry has been used to qualitatively identify volatile AOs in sheet samples of SBR and rubber-type vulcanisates after extraction of the polymer with acetone [51,246]. 

Mass spectrometry can be specific in certain cases, and would even allow on-line QA in the isotope dilution mode. MS of molecular ions is seldom used in speciation analysis. API-MS allows compound-specific information to be obtained. APCI-MS offers the unique possibility of having an element- and compound-specific detector. A drawback is the limited sensitivity of APCI-MS in the element-specific detection mode. This can be overcome by use of on-line sample enrichment, e.g. SPE-HPLC-MS. The capabilities of ESI-MS for metal speciation have been critically assessed [546], Use of ESI-MS in metal speciation is growing. Houk [547] has emphasised that neither ICP-MS (elemental information) nor ESI-MS (molecular information) alone are adequate for identification of unknown elemental species at trace levels in complex mixtures. Consequently, a plea was made for simultaneous use of these two types of ion source on the same liquid chromatographic effluent. 

Mass spectrometry combines exquisite sensitivity with a precision that often depends more on the uncertainties of sampling and sample preparation than on those of the method itself. Mass spectrometry is a supreme identification and recognition method in polymer/additive analysis through highly accurate masses and fragmentation patterns quantitation is its weakness. Direct mass spectrometry of complex polymeric matrices is feasible, yet not often pursued. Solid probe ToF-MS (DI-HRMS) is a breakthrough. Where used routinely, mass spectrometrists are usually still in charge. At the same time, however, costs need to be watched. 

---