Safety instrumented function personnel

Simplified equations and fault tree analysis will be used to determine the PFDavg of the SIF shown in Figure 13-3. One advantage in using the fault tree approach for the PFDavg calculation for this SIF is that most engineering personnel are familiar with the development and analysis of fault trees. This enables them to better understand the operation of complex safety instrumented functions by reviewing its associated fault tree. 

It is interesting to note the heading of the chapter It is named like this to indicate that safety instrumented functions (SIFs—in plural) constitute a safety instrumented system (SIS). From the discussions in previous chapters, readers have come across varieties of definitions of accidents, hazards, and risks from different perspectives. Also there were a few things common such as the accidents are not always negative, and there are always aim to avoid accidents so that there is not loss to the system, personnel, and environment. At the back of the mind, we always try to develop and incorporate some things to reduce risks and to maintain work safety. Therefore, safety work involves some activities, measures, and techniques, which can contribute or help to reductions in losses in different forms, and human injury or fatality. There are quite a good number of elements involved in work safety these include, but are not limited to the following ... 

The result is called a mitigated consequence frequency and is often compared to a company s tolerable risk criteria (e.g., personnel, environment, asset loss). As a result any requirement for additional risk reduction required is identified. The output of the LOPA is the target PFD for the safety instrumented function. 

In conclusion, although the OLF-070 guidelines much the same principles as lEC 61508/61511 the main difference is the initial determination of integrity levels. Whereas the lEC standard defines a risk based approach, the OLF-070 guideline attempts match the safety instrumented functions to common typical loops and assign a minimum integrity level. The disadvantage of this approach is that the demand rate, severity, and personnel exposure to the hazard are not... 

Structural Fatigue and Failure Damage to Equipment Equipment Malfunction Vibration (and Noise) Control for Personnel Safety and Function Comfort, Acceptance, product "Feel" Effects on Instruments, Processes, and Precision Equipment... 

No analytical service can operate efficiently without the internal procedures which can be lumped together under the heading of good housekeeping." Such procedures are basically commonsense routines that ensure that both personnel and instruments function smoothly and reliably, that proper records are kept and kept up-to-the-minute, that specimens are not mislaid, mishandled or cross-contaminated, that reports are compiled and sent on time, that customers are always fully informed, that safety standards are being met. etc. The volume will have much to say about the esoteric aspects of surface and interface analysis. It must always be borne in mind, however, that attention to detail is at least as important to the final outcome. 

The DuPont Sabine River Works had reported between 35,000 and 40,000 instrument installations and more than 5,000 safety interlocks and alarms in 1988. The interlocks and alarms are divided into two classifications the operator aid is used to alert the operator of a nonhazardous abnormal condition that might otherwise be undetected the safety interlock or alarm refers to any equipment whose proper functioning is essential to prevent or signal hazardous process conditions that may threaten personnel or equipment. [26]... 

Inservice verification and testing of safety-related SSCs is conducted by HCF personnel in compliance with TSR surveillance requirements. These operational activities consist of Zonel-to-Zone 2A and Zone 2A-to-Zone 2 ventilation system differential pressure verification, differential pressure instrumentation channel functional testing, ventilation fan sequencing interlock operability testing, and ventilation system hot exhaust filter operability verification. Details of these TSR surveillance tasks and the frequency with which they are to be performed are formalized in an operational surveillance procedure. 

The functional and performance requirements of I C systems should be specified in accordance with the requirements of the operating organization, the capabilities of plant personnel, the safety requirements and the safety analysis of the nuclear power plant. Performance requirements such as the range of the measured variable, accuracy, response time, bandwidth and output signal levels should be determined. The effects of transient and normal variations in the power supply characteristics, such as voltage fluctuations, frequency variations and instrument air pressure variatious, should be taken into account in the design of the safety related I C systems, to the extent necessary to ensure that the I C systems will perform their safety functions adequately. 

---