Safety assessments problems

This book, for the most part, is a stand-alone text. It addresses not only the fundamentals of PSA as a science, but insights on the regulatory framework affecting its development and apidication. In particular, it provides the basic methods of analysis that can be employed, available databases, an excellent set of examples, software resources, chapter summaries that tacilitate comprehension, and problem sets that are very well connected to the theory. While much has been written about probabilistic safety assessment over the last three decades, this is the most comprehensive attempt so far to provide a much needed college level textbook for the education of risk and safety professionals. It also provides a valuable reference for any individual curious enough about the risk and safety sciences to want to become much more informed. 

In the EU, the current chemical control measures, based on a network of legislation for hazard communication and safety assessment, are soon to be dramatically revised. To set the scene for this forthcoming fundamental change to chemical control in the EU, the key facets of the existing measures are described briefly i.e., notification of new chemical substances, the relatively-limited measures to evaluate existing substances and hazard communication. There have been problems with the current scheme, principally the disparity between the safety data on new and existing substances. 

What is called for is a careful zero-based consideration of what the optimum product safety assessment strategy for a particular development problem should be. Before formulating such a strategy and deciding what mix of tests should be used, it is first necessary to decide criteria for what would constitute an ideal (or at least acceptable) test system. 

Some would say that this is the current state of the art. Much of the necessary library could be assembled from test systems that have been extensively evaluated and have already undergone extensive validation (Gad, 2000, 2001). Three critical steps must be taken for the eventual fulfillment of these objectives (1) acceptance of a scientific approach to the problem of safety assessment (2) development of an operative validation and acceptance process for new test procedures (3) clear enunciation of an acceptance criterion for new test designs by regulatory authorities. 

Novel foods, which include artificially-synthesized or genetically-modified foods, create a challenge for food safety monitoring. Even if novel foods pass standard safety assessments, they may generate delayed risks that result in problems which appear suddenly in a susceptible subpopulation. To take population heterogeneity into account, it is possible that in the future the safety of novel foods will be tested by human trials, as is standard practice in pharmacological research on new medicines (Lazarus, 1996). 

Mixture assessment is not possible given the assessment problem. In such cases, safety factors can be applied, but these are not derived from mixture assessment data. An example is the application of an extra safety factor when setting standards for single compounds in order to account for... 

At one time, cobalt chloride, a salt of the metal cobalt, was added to beer in the USA as a foam stabilizer. Such salts had been used to treat people with anaemia at doses of 300 mg per day without any apparent problems. However, heavy beer drinkers, who drank about 10 litres per day, suffered effects on the heart, known as cardiomyopathy, a degeneration of the heart muscle, which was eventually ascribed to the cobalt. It transpired that, while cobalt alone was apparently not toxic to the heart, even at single doses many times higher than the exposure from the additive in beer, in the exceptionally heavy drinkers the toxic effects of cobalt were greatly increased. It turned out that the victims were malnourished individuals and deficient in particular amino acids, which was an important factor in increasing the toxicity of the cobalt. Furthermore, the excessive alcohol intake was itself an additional factor. The potentiation of the toxicity of cobalt was unexpected and so had not been taken into account in the safety assessment. This illustrates the difficulty of anticipating all possible circumstances in safety evaluation. 

Under this broad concept of risk assessment are encompassed all of the essential problems of toxicology that traditional safety assessment schemes have dealt with, but they have been recast to provide a means for answering a different question — that Isr the question of risk. There are other Important differences as well. Risk assessment does not rely on the biologically and statistically dubious concept of a NOEL, but takes into account all of the available dose-response data. It treats uncertainty not by the application of... 

The assessment process in diagnosing bipolar disorder is an essential component of the treatment process for this illness. Assessing the client for critical, harmful problems such as suicidal ideation during a depressive episode may require addressing these problems first as a way of securing the client s safety. Assessment also includes the appropriate use of the criteria provided by the DSM-IV manual and the inclusion of medication as the first priority in treatment planning. 

Glacier-permafrost coupling creates a distinctive hydraulic regime, dominated by transient processes, which must be understood for long term safety assessments. In principle, the problem should be solved by a thermo-mechanically coupled model of the whole ice-water-rock system, driven by an external climate function. As an interim step, we use two separate models, one for... 

All ftirther-reaching assessment criteria and sensitivity analyses become possible only if an additional kinetic evaluation of the experiments can be performed. At this point a further-going safety assessment is often refused with the argument that the determination of kinetic parameters poses a disproportionate expense considering the complexity with which chemical reactions proceed. If one follows a fundamental physicochemical approach to solve this problem, then this argument cannot be denied. However, if a modified approach is chosen, which relies on the same basis of model reduction as was applied to the concept of formal kinetics, this argument is not valid anymore. This modified approach is called thermokinetics. 

All of the above can result in system misdiagnosis, which is known as a Cognitive Task Error. At best, this action delays the correct response at worst, it compounds the problem. A more proactive approach is therefore required, and the wise consideration of the human role, performance and frailties in overall system performance, is thus a fertile area to explore in the System Safety Assessment (SSA). 

---