Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Safeguards Approach

The type of the safeguards agreement and facility, as well as all the above factors are taken into consideration when the safeguards approach for the particular facility is prepared. This approach will determine also the verification methods and the instruments that will be installed permanently at facilities and applied during inspections or used in the analytical laboratories on samples taken by the inspectors. [Pg.2903]


Engineering and economic analysis of the available safeguarding approaches and methods. [Pg.47]

The main drawback of these automated systems is their predictability. In most safeguards approaches, this drawback is compensated for by unannounced or short-notice inspections on a random basis. Most unattended NDA systems are part of the HLNC family. Other systems use low-resolution gamma detectors either in combination or as a stand-alone application. [Pg.2930]

In the framework of the new approach third parties have a particular responsibility. Their task has become more difficult especially in cases where products are manufactured directly to the essential requirements. In that case competent interpretation and judgement needs to be applied in order to evaluate whether the required safety level is achieved or not. Not only safeguard clauses and their economic consequences should be avoided but also possible distortion of the market. An exchange of experience between bodies which are notified for a given directive is therefore normally organised with a view to ensuring its coherent application and to avoid such negative consequences. [Pg.939]

Up to this stage we have considered the deformation behaviour of fibre composites. An equally important topic for the designer is avoidance of failure. If the definition of failure is the attainment of a specified deformation then the earlier analysis may be used. However, if the occurrence of yield or fracture is to be predicted as an extra safeguard then it is necessary to use another approach. [Pg.232]

Many people consider this to be the most important of all the criteria. Obviously a substance must have an effect of some kind if it is to be a NT but not all substances that have an effect on neurons need to be NTs. It may seem unnecessary to say this but the literature contains many accounts of the study of various substances on neuronal activity from which a NT role is predicted without any attempt to compare its effect with that of physiologically evoked (endogenous NT) effects. The importance of this safeguard is highlighted by the ease with which both smooth muscle and neurons will respond to a range of substances that are not released onto them as NTs. Thus the value of this criterion depends very much on the rigour with which it is applied and on its own is no more or less important than any other approach. [Pg.30]

The integration of Protocol measures with those of the existing safeguards systems should be approached in an evolutionary manner and with great care, in order to avoid weakening the safeguards system. [Pg.125]

Schmitz and the other directors, remaining in Berlin, then approached the Goering circle. From March until June, they reminded Goering repeatedly that there were many Jews in the Austrian chemical industry who should be replaced by Aryans, whom Farben stood ready to supply. Even before a decision was made, Schmitz prepared the directives which would "safeguard uniform Farben interests" ... [Pg.98]

The essence of the ASTM E 2012 approach is to determine incompatibility scenarios that could foreseeably occur by examining all possible binary combinations. It may be necessary to review a process by using a systematic method such as a process hazard analysis (PHA) to identify all incompatibility scenarios that have a significant likelihood of occurrence and severity of consequences. The same review can then be used to evaluate whether adequate safeguards exist or whether further risk reduction is warranted. [Pg.29]

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is the term used for a variety of physical devices used to protect the body from hazards. Industrial hazards include impact, excess noise, heat, cold, and noxious chemicals of many different kinds and actions. The type of PPE we are concerned with here, of course, is equipment that can provide protection against hazardous chemicals. Protection may be required specifically for the face and eyes, skin, and the respiratory system, and each may need a different kind of safeguard. However, as previously stated, except in emergencies and special circumstances, PPE should not be relied on as the primary or sole approach to protection. Primary attack at the source by administrative and engineering means must always be considered paramount. [Pg.139]

As gene therapy and stem cell research progress, we can expect more regulatory requirements to be developed to ensure proper safeguards are implemented. Similarly, xenotransplantation and control of biopharmaceutical products will experience specihe regulatory controls as new advances are made. Exhibit 11.13 presents the FDA s current oversight on gene therapy and its cautious approach to cancer vaccine. [Pg.381]

Define process variables which could, or do, approach limiting conditions for hazard. What safeguards are provided against such variables ... [Pg.8]

Some ecstasy users take breaks from physical activity and use cold showers to minimize the dangers of elevated body temperatures. Drug users have tried to safeguard against PMA-induced body temperature elevations in this manner. Fact—Highly elevated body temperature due to PMA poisoning does not respond to these approaches. [Pg.420]

Properly structured concurrent validation is nothing more than prospective validation in slow motion. The use of rigorous criteria and a worst-case sampling approach can assure the suitability of the process and acceptability of the product. The fact that it should be performed three times is more a product of regulatory safeguards and FDA guidance than a scientific necessity. [Pg.111]

As a result of the number of companies operating in the chemical sector, one would expect that it is relatively easy to co-ordinate, harmonise and regulate chemicals across Sweden, but is difficult to do so in the UK. This may be true, but each national regulatory approach also differs due to historical and cultural reasons. Ultimately each approach seeks to safeguard human health and the environment while sustaining the international competitiveness of its national chemical and manufacturing industries. There are several advantages and drawbacks to each approach that depend only partly on the size and structure of the industry. [Pg.109]


See other pages where Safeguards Approach is mentioned: [Pg.566]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.2903]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.2903]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.444]   


SEARCH



Safeguarding

© 2024 chempedia.info