Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Routine analysis, HPLC

Among the techniques employed to estimate the average molecular weight distribution of polymers are end-group analysis, dilute solution viscosity, reduction in vapor pressure, ebuUiometry, cryoscopy, vapor pressure osmometry, fractionation, hplc, phase distribution chromatography, field flow fractionation, and gel-permeation chromatography (gpc). For routine analysis of SBR polymers, gpc is widely accepted. Table 1 lists a number of physical properties of SBR (random) compared to natural mbber, solution polybutadiene, and SB block copolymer. [Pg.493]

The comparison of the obtained quantitative parameters of the methods evidences that HPLC method is better by its perceptibility. However, the chromatodensitometry method is more efficient by the indices of expressity, as far as in a routine analysis it makes it possible to conduct a greater amount of tests during the same period of time, as well as by the criterion cost -efficiency. [Pg.368]

Also for analysis of some pharmaceutical substances a normal-phase mode of HPLC and a lot of organic solvents are needed, especially if it is used in routine analysis. [Pg.390]

The separation of the main AOS components by reverse phase HPLC provided more qualitative and quantitative information in a single operation than any of the other techniques and can be performed in routine analysis. [Pg.436]

Desorption of an analyte from the SPME fibre depends on the boiling point of the analyte, the thickness of the coating on the fibre, and the temperature of the injection port. The fibre can immediately be used for a successive analysis. Some modifications of the GC injector or addition of a desorption module are required. It is possible to automate SPME for routine analysis of many compounds by either GC-MS or HPLC. A significant advantage of SPME over LLE is the absence of the solvent peak in SPME chromatograms. SPME eliminates the separate concentration step from the SPE and LLE methods because the analytes diffuse directly into the coating of the SPME device and are concentrated there. [Pg.131]

Certainly, a vast amount of experience has been gained by the widespread use of conventional amino acid analysers. They offer high reliability, accuracy, reproducibility and can separate complex samples. Because conventional analysers can be fully automated, they are widely used in routine analysis. However, the method is limited by the sensitivity which can be achieved using ninhydrin as the derivatizing agent. Sensitivity can be increased by using ortho-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) instead, but where extremely high sensitivity is required, HPLC is the method of choice. [Pg.50]

Potassium bromate is a widely used dough conditioner. However, if it is used in excessive quantities in bread products then appreciable residues (> 1 mg/kg) can remain which is of concern since it is a cancer suspect agent. Its routine analysis is laborious, time-consuming and difficult by HPLC, and Cunningham and Warner (2000) described the development of an instrumental neutron activation method for determination of bromine while HPLC was used to determine bromate in selected samples. [Pg.118]

A typical chromatogram representing the separation of Hypericum perforatum extract with the HPLC-MS attributions of the components detected is shown in Fig. 2.49. The validation parameters of the method (linearity, stability, reproducibility of the injection integration and repeatability, and robustness) were acceptable, therefore, it was found suitable for routine analysis of the composaition of the extracts of Hypericum perforatum [149],... [Pg.163]

Column size is another important consideration. For equipment designed for most routine laboratory HPLC situations the relative sensitivity of APTelectrospray instruments is better at low flow rates (0.2-0.8 mL/min) whereas the relative sensitivity of APCI instruments is enhanced at high flow rates (0.5-2 mL/min). As a result, small columns are appropriate for API-electrospray/MS and, if only one or two compounds of interest are found in a particular sample, high-resolution separations are not necessary. For APTelectrospray analysis of complex samples, 150 mm x 4.1 mml.D., 3 pm columns (flow 0.5-1.0 mL/min) are usually sufficient. For drug quantification involving analysis of single or low numbers of compounds, small columns such as 30 mm x 2.1 mm I.D., 3.5 pm columns (flow rate 0.2-0.4 mL/min) provide sufficient separation and a saving in both column cost and solvent utilization. The reduced injection volume required for the small columns often results in better resolution and increased sensitivity. [Pg.161]

Repeatability can be divided into two areas injection repeatability and analysis repeatability. Injection repeatability is measured by analyzing multiple injections of the same solution preparation. It is an indicator of the performance of the HPLC system under the specified conditions and at the time of the analyses. This information is included as part of the validation package and is also used during routine analysis in the form of a system suitability. During the validation the specification for % RSD will be set, which will determine the variation limit for the analysis. If the value is low... [Pg.277]

For routine analysis, it is suggested that mass determination of an HPLC purified product is sufficient to be relatively assured that the correct product has been made. Of course, this approach will neither determine if the correct amino acids have been incorporated into an incorrect sequence nor determine if a substitution of amino acids of identical mass has occurred. However, the numerous checkpoints for automated peptide synthesis (bar codes, printouts, etc.) should greatly reduce the probability of this occurring. Should access to mass spectrometric analysis not be available, amino acid analysis is preferable. [Pg.767]

Of the 20 respondents, 19 use mass spectrometry for routine analysis of peptides, 16 use HPLC, and seven use amino add analysis. [Pg.771]

From the available analytical techniques, the most commonly employed is HPLC coupled with an ultraviolet (UV) detector, which provides a rapid, relatively cheap and easy routine analysis of conjugated BAs from serum samples. HPLC with UV detection determination does not require sample derivatisation, but the sensitivity of... [Pg.611]

The molar absorptivity (e) of a known molecule is constant under identical conditions of solvent, concentration and path length, and can be used to quantify the amount of a particular pharmaceutical in a tablet. Such assays form the basis of many quality assurance procedures in the pharmaceutical industry, and have been extensively used by the British Pharmacopoeia (B.P.). More recently, however, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has replaced UV analysis in many B.P. assays, as most industrial analyses routinely use HPLC. [Pg.19]

The first HPLC methods for quantitating vitamin B12 in foods are beginning to appear (Tables 21 and 22). The detection problems are being addressed by coupling HPLC with other analytical techniques. Further work is needed for routine analysis of these vitamers by HPLC. [Pg.449]

One of the major advantages of HPLC in food additives analysis is the comparably simple possibility of automation. When there are many samples to analyze and quantify in routine analysis, an autoinjector usually is the additional component of choice. An autosampler may help to reduce costs, and the instrument may be left to run analyses overnight. Some autoinjectors can also be used to derivatize samples by adding the relevant reagent before injection into the chromatographic system (5). [Pg.580]

There are four basic system types. Type I are basic isocratic systems used for simple, routine analysis in a QA/QC environment often for fingerprinting mixtures or final product for impurity/yield checking. Type II systems are flexible research gradient systems used for methods development, complex gradients, and dial-mix isocratics for routine analysis and standards preparation. They fit the most common need for an HPLC system. Type III systems are fully automated, dedicated systems used for cost-per-test, round-the-clock analysis of a variety of gradient and isocratic samples typical of clinical and environmental analysis laboratories. Type TV systems are fully automated gra-... [Pg.17]

HPLC is commonly used to separate and quantify carotenoids using C18 and, more efficiently, on C30 stationary phases, which led to superior separations and improved peak shape.32 4046 An isocratic reversed-phase HPLC method for routine analysis of carotenoids was developed using the mobile phase composed of either methanol acetonitrile methylene chloride water (50 30 15 5 v/v/v/v)82 or methanol acetonitrile tetrahydrofuran (75 20 5 v/v/v).45 This method was achieved within 30 minutes, whereas gradient methods for the separation of carotenoids can be more than 60 minutes. Normal-phase HPLC has also been used for carotenoid analyses using P-cyclobond46 and silica stationary phases.94 The reversed-phase methods employing C18 and C30 stationary phases achieved better separation of individual isomers. The di-isomers of lycopene, lutein, and P-carotene are often identified by comparing their spectral characteristic Q ratios and/or the relative retention times of the individual isomers obtained from iodine/heat-isomerized lycopene solutions.16 34 46 70 74 101 However, these methods alone cannot be used for the identification of numerous carotenoids isomers that co-elute (e.g., 13-ds lycopene and 15-cis lycopene). In the case of compounds whose standards are not available, additional techniques such as MS and NMR are required for complete structural elucidation and validation. [Pg.68]

Hyphenated chromatographic techniques of various types (e.g., HRGC/HRGC and HPLC/HRGC) are being used in conjunction with a variety of detectors to improve detectability, increase specificity, and reduce cleanup costs for routine analysis. Vuruls et al. (1992) reported ng/L quantitation for aqueous atrazine samples by LC/GC/MS. [Pg.252]

At last, the double focusing sector field mass spectrometer (EBQjQ2) should briefly be addressed. This mass analyser represents a highly sophisticated early design that has rarely been used for routine analysis especially for quantification. For detailed information on the functional principle the reader is referred to respective textbooks on mass spectrometry. We mention this technique as Kajbaf et al. used EBQjQ2 for detection and identification of the QTA cimetropium and its biotransformation products from liver microsomal mixtures in offline analysis of HPLC fractions after FAB ionization [23, 62] (Table 7). [Pg.327]

Waliszewski et al. (2007b) described a simple and rapid HPLC technique for vanillin determination in alcohol vanilla extract, and the method has been applied successfully for the determination of vanillin in some commercial extracts for routine analysis. de Jager et al. (2007) developed a LC-MS method for the determination of vanillin, coumarin and ethyl vanillin in vanilla products using LC-electrospray ionization in the positive ionization mode. The limits of detection for the method ranged from 0.051 to 0.073 pg/ml. [Pg.303]

In terms of methodology, the speciation analysis of Hg has reached its maturity. Because of a convenient conversion of Hg species into volatile compounds, GC has been the dominant separation technique prior to Hg speciPc ICP-MS detection [10, 11, 13, 19]. HPLC methods cannot compete in terms of Pgures of merit with GC. HPLC-ICP-MS is, however, a valuable independent analytical technique that allows the formation of artifacts during derivatization in GC to be controlled. Owing to the availability of a number of CRMs, analytical procedures for the analysis of seafood samples were extensively validated and can be applied in routine analysis. [Pg.517]


See other pages where Routine analysis, HPLC is mentioned: [Pg.1165]    [Pg.1759]    [Pg.1093]    [Pg.1165]    [Pg.1759]    [Pg.1093]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.821]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.769]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.842]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.177]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.173 ]




SEARCH



HPLC analysis

Routine

Routine analysis

© 2024 chempedia.info