Risk analysis techniques

Considerable interest has been generated in hazard identification and risk analysis techniques, which provide a systematic means to help reduce and manage chemical process risks. CCPS has undertaken a series of Guidelines covering many aspects of the subjects to provide the latest information and useful techniques for the engineer in the... 

Several other texts are available on the application of risk analysis techniques in the chemical process industries see AIChemE (2000), Frank and Whittle (2001) and Kletz (1999b). 

The Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) was established in 1981 as a nonprofit organization to foster and promote (1) knowledge and understanding of risk analysis techniques and their applications (2) communication and interaction among individuals engaged in risk analysis (3) application of risk analysis and risk management techniques to the hazards and risks to which individuals and populations are exposed (4) dissemination of risk analysis information and concepts to all interested individuals (5) advancement of the state-of-the-art techniques in all aspects of risk analysis and (6) integration and interaction of the various disciplines involved in risk analysis. 

Before a QRA is pursued, it is important to ensnre that the simpler risk analysis techniques, and their analysis options, have been conducted to the fullest extent. A QRA will provide benefits to the decision process if ... 

The goal of this book is not to devise a specific set of risk reduction options, but, rather, to encourage the apphcation of risk analysis techniques to identify where risk reduction is warranted, and to develop recommendations that can be used in... 

Figure 7.3 shows another example that compares a base case level of operational risk with two risk reduction options using quantitative risk analysis techniques. This F-N curve from Chapter 5 illustrates that both options reduce the likelihood and the potential maximum consequence(s). However, Option 2 results in the greatest risk reduction benefits of lower maximum impacts and lower frequencies. Since both options result in risk reduction, as compared to the baseline, an additional cost-benefit analysis would be required to determine which (if either) of these two options should be considered for implementation. 

The two risk reduction options proposed through the quantitative risk analysis technique (new carrier and route, and current carrier with smaller trucks) did not provide the level of risk reduction management was wilhng to accept. 

Comparisons with Traditional Programmatic Risk Analysis Techniques... 

Fig. 2. Principles of RIPBR Decision-Making Process Development of a risk analysis technique for digital I C QA programs.

CHALLENGES IN APPLYING MCDA AND RISK ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES IN PRACTICE... 

Existing risk analysis techniques commonly focus on the interaction of technical aspects of systems. However, we argue that within complex systems, sociotechnical factors, including the interaction of people with technical components, and the effect of the environment on those interactions provides a different perspective on the risks associated with a system. This view is especially relevant to safety and mission critical systems, where significant consideration to be given to the risks associated with system change and evolution. 

This section discusses two prominent risk analysis techniques that use keywords to guide analysis. 

The aim of project evaluation is to use the available data to provide information which will assist decision making on the future of the project. Use of sensitivity analysis and risk analysis techniques point up areas where uncertainty in the input data has greatest effect and indicates the effects of these uncertainties on the project outcome. Such evaluation does not eliminate the need for skilled judgement in the management team nor does it necessarily make the decision process any easier. However, it does ensure that a complete view of the project is available and makes clear the need for definitive company policy on risk and profitability criteria. 

There are few methods for evaluating the safety of genetically engineered products. Risk analysis techniques are useful. Major differences in standards and procedures exist among countries regarding acceptance of genetically modified organisms (GMO) that enter food supplies. 

Using a Hierarchy of Risk Analysis Techniques for Decision Making... 

Requirements 1 to 7 can be met by the application of either qualitative or quantitative hazard and risk analysis techniques as per part 5 of the Standard. The example to date has applied a quantitative analysis employing a number of techniques. In terms of qualitative assessment, an "unlikely failure but with "catastrophic outcome represents an extreme risk necessitating "necessary risk reduction and application of ALARP (as low as reasonably practicable), good practice and continuous risk reduction principles... 

USING RISK ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES TO SELECT THE LEVEL OF DETAIL FOR A PSSR... 

A literature review was executed to search for articles that present methods based on reliability and risk analysis techniques to support the development of fault diagnosis expert systems. Those articles, published from 1995 to 2014, are used to define the main contributions of the present methodology. 

Examining the contribution of technology to the safety of the entire system is usually done by applying safety-, reliability- and risk analysis techniques developed in past decades. Technical system components can be broken down into subcomponents, the structure of which can be unambiguously defined (i.e. what kind of input data they receive, what functions they use to process data and what kind of output data they provide). For example, a primary radar data processing unit may get the time of transmission and time of reception... 

ABSTRACT Most of the available risk management methods are not directly applicable to academic research laboratories. One solution to systematically perform risk analyses in this environment is the Laboratory Assessment and Risk Analysis (LARA) method. This method was developed to allow untrained personnel to identify of possible risks and rank them according to their importance. The purpose of this study was to find out, if this method can be used as a holistic risk management technique in different environments, and which are the differences when comparing the results to other, well-established risk analysis techniques. The risk analyses were performed at two European universities and for various procedures. The results show, that the LARA procedure ismore easily performable and giving more adequate results than the other methods. Being applicable by non-experts, this holistic risk analysis method for research laboratories can help to reduce the accident rate in the academic environment. 

The purpose of this study is to answer following question can the LARA method be used as a holistic risk management technique in different academic environments and what are the main differences when comparing to the results obtained by industrial risk analysis techniques In order to answer these questions, risk analyses of different procedures were performed using LARA, Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA), and HAZOP. The experiments andyzed are standard operations performed at University of Pardubice and at EPFL. The main differences of the results using the different methods will be pointed out and compared. 

The results of this study suggest, that the LARA can be used as a holistic risk analysis method in the academic laboratory environment. Even though only two examples were examined, the joint test at two universities showed the advantages compared to established risk analysis techniques. 

Gallagher, I, C. Babish, J. Malas (2005). Damage Tolerant Risk Analysis Techniques for Evaluating the Structural Integrity of Aircraft Structures. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on fracture, Turin, Italy. 

Risk involves the combination of frequency and severity. Frequency considers the likelihood that a hazard will lead to an undesired event, incident, or accident. Severity deals with the extent of damage, injury, or harm. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches may be used in risk analysis. The topic of risk is covered in more detail elsewhere in this book. In general, the goal is to decide which hazards are most in need of controls. Clearly, those hazards that have both high frequency and high severity require the greatest attention. Ideally, aU hazards should be eliminated or reduced, but that is not always practical or financially feasible. Risk analysis techniques have been expanded over time for particular classes of hazards and particular methods may be called for in certain cases. Risk analysis is a very important part of the process of hazard recognition, evaluation, and control. 

---