Reverse-osmosis desalination costs

Rosberg, R. (1997). Ultrafiltration (new technology), a viable cost-saving pretreatment for reverse osmosis and nanofiltration—A new approach to reduce costs. Desalination, Int. Symp. Pretreatment of Feedwater for Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plants, March 31-Apr 2,110,1-2,107-114. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands. 

To justify the assumptions, the estimated cost in power consumption, labor, and membrane replacement was compared with that in a seawater reverse osmosis desalination (SWRO) plant (Atikol et al., 2005). For SWRO, the reported cost for power was 0.04 US m, we estimated 0.022 US m for our system. The lower cost in energy consumption is mainly due to the low operating pressure and significantly higher water recovery in this system. The cost for pre-treatment was assumed to be lower than seawater plant due to the significantly much better water quality in the drinking water sources. The maintenance cost was adopted from the... 

TDS affects taste also, and waters over 500 - 600 ppm can taste poor. When the levels top 1500 ppm, most people will report the water tastes very similar to weak alka-seltzer. TDS is removed by distillation, reverse-osmosis or electrodialysis. In our area, most desalination projects, both large and small are accomplished with reverse-osmosis. Depending on the water chemistry, reverse osmosis systems are the most popular, given their low cost and ease of use. Distillers work very well also, and produce very high quality water, but require electricity and higher... 

The successful development of asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes by Loeb and Sourirajan in the early sixties, at the University of California, Los Angeles, has been primarily responsible for the rapid development of Reverse Osmosis (RO) technology for brack sh/sea water desalination. Reverse Osmosis approaches a reversible process when the pressure barely exceeds the osmotic pressure and hence the energy costs are quite low. Theenergy requirement to purify one litre of water by RO is only O.OO3 KW as against 0,7 KV required just to supply the vaporisation energy to change the phase of one litre of water from liquid to vapour by evaporation. Thus RO has an inherent capability to convert brackish water to potable water at economic cost and thus contribute effectively to the health and prosperity of all humanity. 

Reverse osmosis is now extensively used to reduce salt concentrations in brackish waters and to treat industrial waste water, for example, from pulp mills. Reverse osmosis has also proved economical (the cost can be as low as about 1 per 1000 liters) for large-scale desalination of seawater, a proposition of major interest in the Middle East, where almost all potable water is now obtained by various means from seawater or from brackish wells. Thus, at Ras Abu Janjur, Bahrain, a reverse osmosis plant converts brackish feedwater containing 19,000 ppm dissolved solids to potable water with 260 ppm dissolved solids at a rate of over 55,000 m3 per day, with an electricity consumption of 4.8 kilowatt hours per cubic meter of product. On a 1000-fold smaller scale, the resort community on Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia, obtains most of its fresh water from seawater (36,000 ppm dissolved salts) directly by reverse osmosis, at a cost of about 10 per 1000 liters. 

Desalinated seawater and desalinated brackish water are important new sources of fresh water. Although this fresh water is more costly than fresh water from natural sources, one could argue that the higher cost reflects fresh water s true value. In the United States, natural sources of fresh water are relatively plentiful, allowing companies to sell fresh water at rates of a fraction of a penny per liter. Nonetheless, consumers are still willing to buy bottled water at up to 2 per liter Each year Americans spend about 400 million dollars on bottled water, and the market continues to grow rapidly. Unless we conserve fresh water, it is easy to project a growing reliance on distillation and reverse osmosis. 

Lorain, O., B. Hersant, F. Persin, A. Grasmick, N. Brunard, and J. M. Espenan. 2007. Ultrafiltration membrane pre-treatment benefits for reverse osmosis process in seawater desalting. Quantification in terms of capital investment cost and operating cost reduction. Desalination 203 277-285. 

The reverse-osmosis membrane process is considered universally as the most promising technology for brackish and seawater desalination [18]. Potential directions for reducing desalination costs may be deduced by analyzing the cost of the components. 

Some of the largest plants for seawater desalination, wastewater treatment and gas separation are already based on membrane engineering. For example, the Ashkelon Desalination Plant for seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO), in Israel, has been fully operational since December 2005 and produces more than 100 million m3 of desalinated water per year. One of the largest submerged membrane bioreactor unit in the world was recently built in Porto Marghera (Italy) to treat tertiary water. The growth in membrane installations for water treatment in the past decade has resulted in a decreased cost of desalination facilities, with the consequence that the cost of the reclaimed water for membrane plants has also been reduced. 

Membrane materials for reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration applications range from polysulfone and polyethersulfone, to cellulose acetate and cellulose diacetate [12,18-23]. Commercially available polyamide composite membranes for desalination of seawater, for example, are available from a variety of companies in the United States, Europe, and Japan [24]. The specific choice of membrane material to use depends on the process (e.g., type of liquid to be treated and operating conditions) and economic factors (e.g., cost of replacement membranes and cost of cleaning chemicals). The exact chemical composition and physical morphology of the membranes may vary from manufacturer to manufaemrer. Since the liquids to be treated and... 

---