Response time models

In spectroscopy we may distinguish two types of process, adiabatic and vertical. Adiabatic excitation energies are by definition thermodynamic ones, and they are usually further defined to refer to at 0° K. In practice, at least for electronic spectroscopy, one is more likely to observe vertical processes, because of the Franck-Condon principle. The simplest principle for understandings solvation effects on vertical electronic transitions is the two-response-time model in which the solvent is assumed to have a fast response time associated with electronic polarization and a slow response time associated with translational, librational, and vibrational motions of the nuclei.92 One assumes that electronic excitation is slow compared with electronic response but fast compared with nuclear response. The latter assumption is quite reasonable, but the former is questionable since the time scale of electronic excitation is quite comparable to solvent electronic polarization (consider, e.g., the excitation of a 4.5 eV n — n carbonyl transition in a solvent whose frequency response is centered at 10 eV the corresponding time scales are 10 15 s and 2 x 10 15 s respectively). A theory that takes account of the similarity of these time scales would be very difficult, involving explicit electron correlation between the solute and the macroscopic solvent. One can, however, treat the limit where the solvent electronic response is fast compared to solute electronic transitions this is called the direct reaction field (DRF). 49,93 The accurate answer must lie somewhere between the SCRF and DRF limits 94 nevertheless one can obtain very useful results with a two-time-scale version of the more manageable SCRF limit, as illustrated by a very successful recent treatment... 

J. Li, C. J. Cramer, and D. G. Truhlar, A two-response-time model based on CM2/INDO/S2 electrostatic potentials for the dielectric polarization component of solvatochromic shifts on vertical excitation energies, Int. J. Quan. Chem. 77 264 (2000). 

The primal advantage of hierarchical databases is that the relationship between the data at the different levels is easy. The simplicity and efficiency of the data model is a great advantage of the hierarchical DBS. Large data sets (scries of measurements where the data values are dependent on different parameters such as boiling point, temperature, or pressure) could be implemented with an acceptable response time. 

Fig. 7. Voigt model analysis of (a) lateral contact stiffness and (b) the response time, t, for a silicon nitride tip vs. poly(vinylethylene) as a function of frequency and polymer aging times. Reprinted with permission from ref [71].

Many HVAC system engineering problems focus on the operation and the control of the system. In many cases, the optimization of the system s control and operation is the objective of the simulation. Therefore, the appropriate modeling of the controllers and the selected control strategies are of crucial importance in the simulation. Once the system is correctly set up, the use of simulation tools is very helpful when dealing with such problems. Dynamic system operation is often approximated by series of quasi-steady-state operating conditions, provided that the time step of the simulation is large compared to the dynamic response time of the HVAC equipment. However, for dynamic systems and plant simulation and, most important, for the realistic simulation... 

The response time in this simple model will depend on the turnover times of both reservoirs and will always be shorter than the shortest of the two turnover times. If tqi is equal to T02, then Tcycle will be equal to half of this value. 

TAUl, TAU2 = time constants in the reduced order model. Essentially the "response time" of the nodes these are the time "lags" for thermal conduction in the extmder... 

A Box-Behnken design was employed to investigate statistically the main and interactive effects of four process variables (reaction time, enzyme to substrate ratio, surfactant addition, and substrate pretreatment) on enzymatic conversion of waste office paper to sugars. A response surface model relating sugar yield to the four variables was developed on the basis of the experimental results. The model could be successfully used to identify the most efficient combination of the four variables for maximizing the extent of sugar production. 

Orion Model 95-64). In practice, one simply determines E ntot by calibration with a standard solution without the necessity of knowing the various constants mentioned. The S02 electrode allows the determination of concentrations down to 10 8 Af with a response time of a few minutes. From the above it appears that the gas-sensing electrodes show Nemstian behaviour provided that the concentrations to be measured are not high there is little or no interference by other components in the sample solution. 

When the pole p is negative, the decay in time of the entire response will be slower (with respect to only one single pole) because of the terms involving time in the bracket. This is the reason why we say that the response of models with repeated roots (e g., tanks-in-series later in Section 3.4) tends to be slower or "sluggish."... 

This paper extends previous studies on the control of a polystyrene reactor by including (1) a dynamic lag on the manipulated flow rate to improve dynamic decoupling, and (2) pole placement via state variable feedback to improve overall response time. Included from the previous work are optimal allocation of resources and steady state decoupling. Simulations on the non-linear reactor model show that response times can be reduced by a factor of 6 and that for step changes in desired values the dynamic decoupling is very satisfactory. 

It has been suggested that a sensitive test of the diffusion model would be found in the evolution of the eh yield (Schwarz, 1969). Early measurements by Hunt and Thomas (1967) and by Thomas and Bensasson (1967) revealed -6% decay within the first 10 ns and 15% decay in 50 ns. The diffusion theory of Schwarz predicts a very substantial decay ( 30%) in the first nanoseconds for instantaneous energy deposition. Schwarz (1969) tried to mitigate the situation by first integrating over pulse duration (-4.2 ns) and then over the detector response time (-1.2 ns). This improved the agreement between theory and experiment somewhat, but a hypothesis of no decay in this time scale would also agree with experiment. Thus, it was decided that a crucial test of the diffusion theory would... 

Over the last several years, the number of studies on application of artificial neural network for solving modeling problems in analytical chemistry and especially in optical fibre chemical sensor technology, has increase substantially69. The constructed sensors (e.g. the optical fibre pH sensor based on bromophenol blue immobilized in silica sol-gel film) are evaluated with respect to prediction of error of the artificial neural network, reproducibility, repeatability, photostability, response time and effect of ionic strength of the buffer solution on the sensor response. 

Recently, Orosz et al. [136] reviewed and critically reevaluated some of the known mechanistic studies. Detailed mathematical expressions for rate constants were presented, and these are used to derive relationships, which can then be used as guidelines in the optimization procedure of the POCL response. A model based on the time-window concept, which assumes that only a fraction of the exponential light emission curve is captured and integrated by the detector, was presented. Existing data were used to simulate the detector response for different reagent concentrations and flow rates. 

In this work we attempt to measure kinetics data in a time short compared with the response time of the catalyst stoichiometry. An alternative is to measure kinetics in a true steady state, i.e., to increase the line-out time at each reactor condition until hysteresis is eliminated. The resulting apparent reaction orders and activation energies would be appropriate for an industrial mathematical model of reactor behavior. 

For vapour detection there are three aspects that are modelled sensitivity, response time, and regeneration. The sensitivity determines at which concentration level the detector will respond. The theoretical detector output (alarm or no alarm) is calculated by comparing the input data (concentration, relative humidity) with empirical detector display outputs, obtained during controlled exposure laboratory experiments. The response time determines how long it takes before the detector actually shows the response and it depends on the concentration level. The regeneration time determines how long it takes, after a positive detection, before the detector can do a new measurement. 

There are few models with automatic test capability. Testing is usually limited to hand held devices only 2 meters (7 ft.) from the detector or directly on the lens test unit. It can be ineffective if ice forms on the lens. It is sensitive to modulated emissions from hot black body sources. Most of the detectors have fixed sensitivities. The standard being under five seconds to a petroleum fire of 0.1 square meter (1.08 sq. ft.) located 20 meters (66 ft.) from the device. Response times increase as the distance increases. It cannot be used in locations where the ambient temperatures could reach up to 75 °C (167 °F). It is resistant to contaminants that could affect a UV detector. Its response is dependent on fires possessing a flicker characteristic so that detection of high pressure gas flames may be difficult. 

The modeling discussed here depends on being able to describe the entire concentration-time curve. This can only be done using a Level A IVIVC (i.e., a point-to-point relationship between in vitro release and in vivo release/absorption). In fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines a Level A IVIVC as a predictive mathematical model for the relationship between the entire in vitro dissolution-release time course and the entire in vivo response time course. 

---