Database hierarchical

Oracle and Access are two examples of relational database management systems. SAP , which has thonsands of tables, is an example of a large application that makes use of relational database technology. There are two other types of databases — hierarchical and network — but these are less common and generally limited to the mainframe world and will not be discussed here. This chapter will focus primarily on relational databases. 

A hierarchical system is the simplest type ofdatabase system. In this form, the var-iou.s data typc.s also called entities (sec figure 5-,3) arc as.signcd. systematically to various levels (Figure 5-5). The hierarchical system is represented as an upside-down tree with one root segment and ordered nodes. Each parent object can have one or more children (objects) but each child has only one parent. If an object should have more than one parent, this entity has to be placed a second time at another place in the database system. 

In order to trace (find, change, add, or delete) a segment in the database, the sequence in which the data arc read is important. Thus, the sequence of the hierarchical path is parent > child > siblings. The assignment of the data entities uses pointers. In our example, the hierarchical path to K is traced in Figure 5-fi. 

Typical examples of hierarchical database systems arc the file system of personal computers or the organization of parts (e.g., a construction plan). In the case of car parts, the objects (e.g. B = rear suspension, E = right wheel, J = rim, K = screw) are... 

Figure 5 -5. Hierarchical structure of a database. For example, object E on level 2 is the parent of the child objects J and K.

The primal advantage of hierarchical databases is that the relationship between the data at the different levels is easy. The simplicity and efficiency of the data model is a great advantage of the hierarchical DBS. Large data sets (scries of measurements where the data values are dependent on different parameters such as boiling point, temperature, or pressure) could be implemented with an acceptable response time. 

The network model of a database system is an improvement over the hierarchical model. This model was developed in 1969 by the Data Base Task Group (DBTG) of CODASYL (Conference on Data System Languages) [8, because sometimes the re-... 

The relational database model was developed by Codd at IBM in 1970 [9]. Oracle provided the first implementation in 1979. The hierarchical database IMS was replaced by DB2, which is also an RDBMS. There exist himdreds of other DBMSs, such as SQL/DS, XDB, My SQL, and Ingres. 

SCOP Structural Classification of Proteins. Hierarchical protein structure database... 

Relational databases can store unlimited numbers of results for every sample and unlimited samples for every request. The advantage of a relational DBMS over a more traditional hierarchical system, in which data sets may contain other data sets, is that the design of the database only has to consider relationships between data elements, not the number of instances for any given variable. 

The first requirement for threading is to have a database of all the known different protein folds. Eisenberg has used his own library of about 800 folds, which represents a minimally redundant set of the more than 6000 structures deposited at the Protein Data Bank. Other groups use databases available on the World Wide Web, where the folds are hierarchically ordered according to structural and functional similarities, such as SCOP, designed by Alexey Murzin and Cyrus Chothia in Cambridge, UK. 

ISIS databases are hierarchical, so CHIRBASE was designed to incorporate about 60 data fields on several levels of detail (the main fields are listed in Table 4-2). The first level contains the molecular structure of the sample combined to the molecular structure of the CSP, producing a unique location or entry for a specific sample-CSP couple. Consequently, in the current version of CHIRBASE, which contains 40 000 entries, one entry corresponds to the separation of one sample on one CSP and contains in different sublevels a compilation of all the references and the various analytical conditions available for this separation. 

File manager systems—Maintain files and handle data input to and output from the files. Database management systems (DBMS) contain integrated sets of files related by their use and provide uniform software interfaces for accessing data. The essential relationships between records in the files may be of several types, including sequential, associative, or hierarchical. 

A database (or data base) is a collection of data that is organised so that its contents can easily be accessed, managed, and modified by a computer. The most prevalent type of database is the relational database which organises the data in tables multiple relations can be mathematically defined between the rows and columns of each table to yield the desired information. An object-oriented database stores data in the form of obj ects which are organised in hierarchical classes that may inherit properties from classes higher in the tree structure. 

Planned orders and other information are sent from the ERP system to a scheduling system via an interface. The scheduling system has its own database and a number of different automatic and interactive scheduling functions. Scheduling results are sent back to the superior system via an interface at the end of the scheduling process. This loose integration respects the hierarchical concept and the autonomy of the planners. 

Vast tabulations of 13C chemical shift data have been assembled in computer searchable form. These databases form the basis for 13C chemical shift prediction algorithms. For the most part, carbon chemical shifts can be calculated using what is referred to as a Hierarchically Ordered Spherical Environment (HOSE) code approach [28]. To calculate a given carbon s chemical shift, the influence of each successive spherical shell is applied to the starting chemical shift for that carbon to calculate its overall chemical shift. Typically, programs will calculate shifts for 3 or 4 layers, beyond which the effects of most substituents are negligible. The spherical layers surrounding the 23-position of strychnine are shown in Fig. 10.8. 

BioPrint ] database, plC50]. Biological assays are ofthe activities of the same set ofcompounds for on the x-axis, and compounds on the y-axis each target. The activities are shown in the form (i.e. a row contains the biological fingerprint of a of a heat map, with red most active and blue-compound as heat map). Hierarchical clustering green inactive. Compounds tend to cluster into has been performed on both axes compounds therapeutic area and this is marked on the left. 

Figure 3. A subset of the chemical substructures database, showing the hierarchical ordering.

---