Relations Between Different Material Coefficients

Let us now look at the interrelations holding between the material coefficients listed in Table 4.2. In the context of coupling effects it has already been shown that the direct and the converse piezoelectric effects are described by identical material coefficients. This follows immediately from their definition as second derivatives of the associated thermodynamic potential, recognizing the fact that the order of differentiations may be reversed. Direct and converse effects are described by relations between different pairs of variables. The equality of the coefficients governing the direct and the converse effects reduces the number of independent material coefficients for each selection of the triple of independent variables. It does not, however, represent a relation between material coefficients derived from different thermodynamic potentials. 

A different situation arises with the principal effects. An inverse effect exists for each of them. As an example let us consider the relation between electric flux density and electric field strength written in coordinate notation 

Eik are the coordinates of the permittivity tensor. In order to define the effect and the material coefficients uniquely, elastic and thermal conditions must be specified Either temperature, or entropy as well as either strain or stress are to be held constant. So, in the general relation (4.30) four different permittivities may appear, namely e.j , , e, and, where the different superscripts denote the state 

maintaining unchanged thermal and mechanical constraints, the system of Eqs. (4.30) is solved for the inverse dependence is obtained 

The quantities Pjk are also dielectric material coefficients. Their dimension is obviously reciprocal to the dimension of the permittivity. They are also the coordinates of a symmetric second rank tensor for which several names have been in use. Following Thurston (1974) we call it impermittivity. (Alternatively, the names dielectric impermeability (Cady 1964, p. 163), dielectric permeability (Grindlay 1970, p. 56), vetivity , derived from the latin word vetare as the opposite to the latin permittere (Voigt 1910, p. 441) have been proposed.) The effect described by Eq. (4.31) is the inverse effect to Eq. (4.30). It is obvious that E and D have exchanged their roles as independent and dependent variables and, therefore, Sij and Pij are material coefficients derived from different thermodynamic potentials. 

---

It is believed that this can be related to the differences in coefficient of restitution between the conveyed particles and the pipeline walls. On impact with the rubber, the particles will be decelerated, since the rubber will absorb much of the energy of impact. As a consequence, the particles will have to be re-accelerated back to their terminal velocity. The coefficient of restitution of the particles against the steel pipeline wall will be very much lower. This effect is clearly magnified by increase in velocity and explains why there is little difference between the two pipeline materials in low velocity dense phase conveying, but differ by 50% in high velocity dilute phase conveying. The results obtained with the barite were very similar. 

These composite results suggest that the distribution and availability of free volume in PTMSP and the TFE DD copolymers are very different. Both PTMSP and the TFE/PDD copolymers are high Tg, stiff chain materials, so it is unlikely that the vast differences in accessible free volume and permeability coefficients is solely related to great differences in segmental dynamics between these materials which would render the free volume in PTMSP much more accessible on the time scales appropriate for PALS and permeation. Rather, it seems more likely that free volume elements in PTMSP are interconnected and span the sample, providing extremely efficient pathways for penetrant diffusion. In fret, the notion of interconnected free volume elements in ITMSP has been invoked to explain the unusual transport... 

Materials typically expand when heated. The expansion is characterized by the linear or volumetric thermal expansion coefficient. The three primary types of materials expand differently. Polymers expand more than metals, and metals expand more than ceramics. For many materials thermal expansion is related to the melting temperature of the material, also a relation between the thermal expansion coefficient of polymers and their elastic modulus is given. 

Next, let us establish the procedure to obtain relations between material coefficients derived from different thermodynamic potenhals. As an example we take the coefficients related to the Gibbs funchon G and to the Helmholtz free energy F. The constitutive equations associated with G have already been stated but are repeated here for ease of reference. 

RHEED oscillations are also particularly useful in monitoring the type of growth mode of the depositing material. Four different film growth modes are generally identified mainly related to the diffusion coefficient of the adatoms on the surface, the dimensions of the substrate terraces, and the lattice parameter mismatch between the substrate and the film ... 

In this section, the friction and wear of PTFE-based composites with different nano-scaled fillers are explicitly discussed. The friction coefficients of PTFE-based composites with different nanoscaled fillers differ with each other because of the dissimilar physical and chemical properties of different types of nanofiUers. However, despite the different nanofiller type and content, the variation of friction coefficient between PTFE-based composites and pure PTFE is evident under different experimental conditions. On the one hand, this is caused by the very low friction coefficient of pure PTFE so that a further decrease in friction coefficient becomes a formidable issue. On the other hand, due to the material nature of the nanofillers—for instance the lubrication property of nano-EG significantly lowers the friction coefficient of PTFE/nano-EG composites while friction coefficient of PTFE/nanoserpentine composites barely changes, which is greatly related to the material nature of the nanofillers. Conversely, a dramatic reduction in wear rate is observed in all PTFE-based composites. It is believed that the strong interfacial interaction, high shear strength, enhanced load capacity, and extra lubrication effect of PTFE-based composites with nanoscaled fillers are responsible for the improvement of wear resistance. However, the specific enhancement mechanism remains unsolved. 

The phenomenological approach does not preclude a consideration of the molecular origins of the characteristic timescales within the material. It is these timescales that determine whether the observation you make is one which sees the material as elastic, viscous or viscoelastic. There are great differences between timescales and length scales for atomic, molecular and macromolecular materials. When an instantaneous deformation is applied to a body the particles forming the body are displaced from their normal positions. They diffuse from these positions with time and gradually dissipate the stress. The diffusion coefficient relates the distance diffused to the timescale characteristic of this motion. The form of the diffusion coefficient depends on the extent of ordering within the material. 

When a fluid is heated, the hot less-dense fluid rises and is replaced by cold material, thus setting up a natural convection current. When the fluid is agitated by some external means, then forced convection takes place. It is normally considered that there is a stationary film of fluid adjacent to the wall and that heat transfer takes place through this film by conduction. Because the thermal conductivity of most liquids is low, the main resistance to the flow of heat is in the film. Conduction through this film is given by the usual relation (74), but the value of h is not simply a property of the fluid but depends on many factors such as the geometry of the system and the flow dynamics for example, with tubes there are significant differences between the inside and outside film coefficients. 

Thus, we have attempted to give, in the present appendix, an idea of the various methods of determining classical and quantum mechanical polarization moments and some related coefficients. We have considered only those methods which are most frequently used in atomic, molecular and chemical physics. An analysis of a great variety of different approaches creates the impression that sometimes the authors of one or other investigation find it easier to introduce new definitions of their own multipole moments, rather than find a way in the rather muddled system of previously used ones. This situation complicates comparison between the results obtained by various authors considerably. We hope that the material contained in the present appendix might, to some extent, simplify such a comparison. 

---