Recursion

The program is again put into the system using consult(user). This very simple recursive program is quite powerful. Obviously we can ask whether b is a member of the list [a,b,c] by typing in 

The first condition does not match, so PROLOG tries the second one. This amounts to matching member(b,[a b,c]), which also fails. The third subrule reduces to member(b,[ b,c]) and results in calling member(b,[b,c]). The first subrule again fails, but the second one results in success, and we get the answer yes.. 

If the first argument to member is not a member of the list, we will eventually reduce the list to the empty list. Then the first subrule applies, resulting in a general fail of the member predicate. If we ask member(X,[a,b,c]). we get answer X = a. Upon backtracking we are further presented with the alternate solutions X = b and X = c. The question member(x,[a,B,c] leads to the unique answer B = x. 

To make use of this new tool we have to restructure our data base as indicated above, namely by entering the facts about the TLC behavior of our two model compounds in the new form. To enter the data we call again consult(user). and enter  

To retrieve a single entry from the list, i.e. to duplicate the function formerly performed by hrf, we need a new rule which picks one TLC data set. If the head of our new rule exactly duplicates the old one, the only things to do is to enter the new rule and to delete the old one. Thus, the most simple solution becomes 

---

L. Ljung, T. Sbderstrbm, Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983... 

METHOD OF DERICHE By resuming the model proposed by Canny, and relaxing the spatial limited support hypothesis, R. Deriche finds a more effective optimal edge operator and proposes a recursive implementation. 

N. B. a has the inverse role of a in the first derivative of a Gaussian. Deriche proposes the following recursive implementation of the filter/in two dimensions. Deriche retains the same solution as Canny, that is ... 

To apply this method, the J, are calculated once and stored while the T, are generated using the recursion... 

The first tenn is zero if j due to the orthogonality of the Hemiite polynomials. The recursion relation in equation (B 1,2.4 ) is rearranged... 

D Mello M, Duneczky C and Wyatt R E 1988 Recursive generation of individual S-matrix elements application to the collinear H + H2 reaction Chem. Phys. Lett. 148 169... 

Mandelshtam V A and Taylor H S 1995 A simple recursion polynomial expansion of the Green s function with absorbing boundary conditions. Application to the reactive scattering J. Chem. Phys. 102... 

We here describe the alternative of approximating <,c(S)b via Lanczos method. The Lanczos process [18, 22] recursively generates an orthonormal basis Qm = [qi,.., qm] of the mth Krylov subspace... 

This construction requires one matrix-vector multiplication with S and two inner products in each recursive step. Therefore, it is not necessary to store S explicitly as a matrix. The Lanczos process yields the approximation [21, 7, 12]... 

Rusinko A III, M W Farmen, C G Lambert, P L Brown and S S Young 1999. Analysis of a Larj Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. Journal of Chemic Information and Computer Science 39 1017-1026. 

During Stages II and III the average concentration of radicals within the particle determines the rate of polymerization. To solve for n, the fate of a given radical was balanced across the possible adsorption, desorption, and termination events. Initially a solution was provided for three physically limiting cases. Subsequentiy, n was solved for expHcitiy without limitation using a generating function to solve the Smith-Ewart recursion formula (29). This analysis for the case of very slow rates of radical desorption was improved on (30), and later radical readsorption was accounted for and the Smith-Ewart recursion formula solved via the method of continuous fractions (31). 

Since Y has N components, while Y and Yf have N/2 components, Yl and Yf are repeated once to give N components in the calculation of Y. This decomposition can be used recursively. Thus, Yf is split into even and odd terms of length N/4. 

Crowe, C.M., Recursive Identification of Gross Errors in Linear Data Reconciliation, AJChE Journal, 34(4), 1988,541-550. (Global chi square test, measurement test)... 

Bl) The metrics effect is very significant in special theoretical examples, like a freely joined chain. In simulations of polymer solutions of alkanes, however, it only slightly affects the static ensemble properties even at high temperatures [21]. Its possible role in common biological applications of MD has not yet been studied. With the recently developed fast recursive algorithms for computing the metric tensor [22], such corrections became affordable, and comparative calculations will probably appear in the near future. 

The sum in Eq. (43) can be obtained by a recursion algorithm used commonly in dynamic programming [62]. 

The reflectivity for this simple case can be extended readily to more complex situations where there are concentration gradients in single films or multilayers comprised of different components. Basically the reflectivity can be calculated from a simple recursion relationship that effectively reduces any gradients in composition to a histogram representing small changes in the concentration as a function of depth. Details on this can be found in the literature cited. ... 

Equation (8.76) is called the matrix vector difference equation and can be used for the recursive discrete-time simulation of multivariable systems. 

The reverse-time recursive process can commence with P(A) = 0 or alternatively, with P(A - 1) = TQ. 

Before equations (9.99) can be run, and initial value of P(/c//c) is required. Ideally, they should not be close to the final value, so that convergence can be seen to have taken place. In this instance, P(/c//c) was set to an identity matrix. Figure 9.16 shows the diagonal elements of the Kalman gain matrix during the first 20 steps of the recursive equation (9.99). 

Using the recursive equations (9.29) and (9.30), solve, in reverse time, the Riccati equation commencing with P(A ) = 0. 

If the sampling time is 0.1 seconds, the values of the discrete-time state transition and control matrices AfT) and BfT) calculated in Example 9.8 may be used in the recursive solution. 

Continue the recursive steps until the solution settles down (when k = 50, or kT = 5 seconds) and hence determine the steady-state value of the feedback matrix K(0) and Riccati matrix P(0). What are the closed-loop eigenvalues ... 

The script file kalfild.m solves, in forward-time, the discrete solution of the Kalman filter equations, using equations (9.74), (9.75) and (9.76) in a recursive process. The MATLAB command Iqed gives the same result. 

This is a recursion formula for the exact case. We would like to be able to apply this to any number n of CSTRs in series and find an analytical and then quantitative result for comparison to the exact PFR result. To do this weneedrecursive programming. There are threeprogrammingstylesin Mathematica Rule-Based,Functional,and Procedural.Wewill attackthisprobleminrecursionwith Rule-Based,Functional,and Procedural programming. WecanbeginbylookingattherM/e-tosed recursioncodesforCaandCbinanynCSTRs. 

The above formulas combined with Eqs. (74) and (75) taken at zero charge density yield Eq. (54) for the differential capacitance. Eq. (82) can be used recursively to generate the derivatives of the differential capacity at zero charge density to an arbitrary order, though the calculations become rather tedious already for the second derivative. Thus, in principle at least, we can develop capacitance in the Taylor series around the zero charge density. The calculations show that the capacitance exhibits an extremum at the point of zero charge only in the case of symmetrical ions, as expected. In contrast with the NLGC theory, this extremum can be a maximum for some values of the parameters. In the case of symmetrical ions the capacitance is maximum if + — a + a, < 1. We can understand this result... 

---