Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Recursive specifications

For some differential equations, the two roots and S2 of the indicial equation differ by an integer. Under this circumstance, there are two possible outcomes (a) steps 1 to 6 lead to two independent solutions, or (b) for the larger root 5i, steps 1 to 6 give a solution mi, but for the root S2 the recursion relation gives infinite values for the coefficients a beyond some specific value of k and therefore these steps fail to provide a second solution. For some other differential equations, the two roots of... [Pg.319]

More specifically, the basic notions of a Turing Machine, of computable functions and of undecidable properties are needed for Chapter VI (Decision Problems) the definitions of recursive, primitive recursive and partial recursive functions are helpful for Section F of Chapter IV and two of the proofs in Chapter VI. The basic facts regarding regular sets, context-free languages and pushdown store automata are helpful in Chapter VIII (Monadic Recursion Schemes) and in the proof of Theorem 3.14. For Chapter V (Correctness and Program Verification) it is useful to know the basic notation and ideas of the first order predicate calculus a highly abbreviated version of this material appears as Appendix A. [Pg.6]

Any finite interpretation is necessarily recursive. There are only a finite number of function letters and predicate letters in P and so for each finite domain D only a finite number of possible assignments of functions from iP to D or eP to 0,1. We can recursively enumerate all finite interpretations. A program must loop if it ever enters the sane statement twice with all values specified alike. If finite domain D of interpretation I has d objects and P has n statements and m variables of any kind, then any execution sequence under I with more than ncP steps must twice enter the same statement with the same specification of all variables and hence must represent an infinite loop. Hence for each input vector a computation (P,I,a) diverges if and only if it fails to halt within ndm steps. So for each finite interpretation we can decide whether P baits for some inputs or all inputs. Thus (5) and (6) are partially decidable. [Pg.209]

Each decomposition divides the job into a set of constituents, each with a specification that can be fulfilled separately. The same principles can be applied recursively to its design. Thus, you can specify an entire application as a type and then decompose it into internal collaborating components. If the components are of a nontrivial size, recursively model and specify each of them as a type. [Pg.307]

Basic design shortcuts some of the recursive refinement process by going straight for a set of decisions that accept the specification types as protoclasses. A judicious combination of basic design, subsequent optimization, and recursive refinement is practical for many projects. [Pg.307]

The process of modeling and designing is recursive throughout business, component specification, and internal design. Similarly, specification and implementation activities are also recursive across the business or domain model, component spec, and internal design. [Pg.530]

An important principle of this recursive decomposition is that, at each level, the components can be designed independently if the specifications are accurate enough. [Pg.532]

There are still three conceptual levels the domain models (the outside, describing the environment in which the software will reside), the component specifications (the boundary, describing its externally desired behaviors), and the component implementation (the inside, describing its internal design). These three levels continue recursively Each subcomponent itself has a context (the collaboration with others that should realize the external spec), a specification, and its own implementation. [Pg.539]

In simple cases, you can start with the assumption that every type identified in the specification model will be implemented directly as a separate class for large components you may go through a recursive step of subcomponent partition and specification. We determine intended responsibilities of each class and then build interaction diagrams to design their interactions to realize the specified behaviors. [Pg.543]

Pattern 14.32, Use-case led system specification (p.619) or Pattern 14.33, Recursive decomposition — divide and conquer (p.621). [Pg.628]

Because of round-off errors, symmetry contamination is often present even when the initial vector is properly symmetrized. To circumvent this problem, an effective scheme to reinforce the symmetry at every Lanczos recursion step has been proposed independently by Chen and Guo100 and by Wang and Carrington.195 Specifically, the Lanczos recursion is executed with symmetry-adapted vectors, but the matrix-vector multiplication is performed at every Lanczos step with the unsymmetrized vector. In other words, the symmetrized vectors are combined just before the operation Hq, and the resultant vector is symmetrized using the projection operators ... [Pg.322]

In chemoinformatics research, partitioning algorithms are applied in diversity analysis of large compound libraries, subset selection, or the search for molecules with specific activity (1-4). Widely used partitioning methods include cell-based partitioning in low-dimensional chemical spaces (1,3) and decision tree methods, in particular, recursive partitioning (RP) (5-7). Partitioning in low-dimensional chemical spaces is based on various dimension reduction methods (4,8) and often permits simplified three-dimensional representation of... [Pg.291]

Descriptor requirements present a significant difference between MP and decision tree methods such as RP. Whereas two-state descriptors are not suitable for MP, these types of descriptors are typically required for decision tree algorithms because at each branch the presence or absence of specific feature(s) must be detected in order to recursively divide a molecular dataset. [Pg.298]

Fig. 3. Recursive partitioning. Recursive partitioning divides compounds into progressively smaller groups using specific features. The splitting features are selected using the potency of the compounds. Fig. 3. Recursive partitioning. Recursive partitioning divides compounds into progressively smaller groups using specific features. The splitting features are selected using the potency of the compounds.
Results with Surgery and Radiation Therapy Trials of Chemotherapeutic Agents Recursive Partitioning Analysis Specific Therapy Considerations in non-GBM Malignant Gliomas Radiation Therapy Strategies Novel Chemotherapeutic Agents Future Directions References... [Pg.129]

Among all these cognitive interactions between autopoietic entities and the envi-romnent, some are particularly important because they are recursive, i.e., they happen repeatedly. For example, throughout a membrane there is a continuous flux of sodium or calcium ions. This active transport is selective in the sense that it happens with certain ions and not with others. Where does this specificity come from The answer lies in the phylogenesis, the history of the living species, where each state... [Pg.165]

Recovered sulfur supply predictions depend on explicit assumptions or scenarios concerning the development of specific fuels and the production of sulfide ores. They also depend on a second set of assumptions with respect to sulfur pollution control regulations, the means by which these will be met, and the recursive impact of the controls on the production scenarios. For example, given uncertainties surrounding regenerative flue gas desulfurization (FGD) processes, including the sale of sulfur products and concern over process reliability, utilities have been emphasizing throw-away techniques. As new control standards are implemented the disposal... [Pg.2]

The IT security development process, compliant to [6], corresponds to the step by step creation of ST or PP specifications. It encompasses 6 stages, presented below, each having wizard driven steps. Wizard functionalities represent the essence of IT security development methodology. For each step, the developer, aided by the tool and provided with necessary input data to analyze it, specifies output data. For attaching items to the specification, a short justification and coverage status can be added. The wizards, itemizing the actions, suggest sequential nature of the development process. It is not true - it is complex, rather recursive and incremental. [Pg.15]


See other pages where Recursive specifications is mentioned: [Pg.26]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.720]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.572]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.16 ]




SEARCH



Recursion

Recursive

© 2024 chempedia.info