Recovery and sensitivity

Studies designed to improve the determination of environmental contaminants will continue to provide refinements and improvements in the determination of acrylonitrile. The current high level of activity in supercritical fluid extraction of solid and semisolid samples should yield improved recoveries and sensitivities for the determination of acrylonitrile in solid wastes, and the compound should be amenable to supercritical fluid chromatographic analysis. Immunoassay analysis is another area of intense current activity from which substantial advances in the determination of acrylonitrile in environmental samples can be anticipated (Vanderlaan et al. 1988). 

Recent clearance studies use stable isotope dilution methods. MS methods make it possible to measure deuterated and endogenous species simultaneously and specifically. LC-MS methods offer advantages over GC-MS methods, such as streamlined sample preparation (no derivatization necessary), high recovery and sensitivity and superior specificity. 

Quantitation was with a Hewlett-Packard Model 5970B Mass Selective Detector run in the SIM (Selective Ion Mode) at the major unique M/E for each compound. Retention times of 17.7 min and 22.7 min were recorded for Z-9-DDA (M.W. 198) and Z-ll-TDA (M.W. 254), respectively. Recoveries and sensitivities are found in Table II. Figure 1 illustrates the SIM response for standard materials, while Figures 2 and 3 are of a check material, and a check spiked with pheromone at the 5 ppb level. Figure 4 demonstrates the absence of... 

The capacity of the ion-exchange column is important for achieving good recoveries and sensitivity in the analysis of urine samples. Low capacities may result in low recoveries (e.g. 78% recovery for 100 p column) while large capacitic lcL ase the EF value (e.g. F = 21 for 400 p column). 200 p columns give optimum overall performance. 

Method performance in air analysis involves terms such as accuracy, storage stability, capacity, sampling rate, recovery, and sensitivity. To evaluate the performance of a developed method, certified reference materials for particulate matter, such as urban dust SRM 1649a particulate matter from NIST (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) can be purchased. In addition, a standard reference material has been recently developed for the determination of organic compounds in house dust the SRM 2585 is intended for using in method validation for the analysis of PAHs, PCBs, chlorinated pesticides, and PBDEs (Poster et al. 2007). 

How then do the techniques differ For this, the terms recovery and sensitivity must be defined. For both methods, the recovery depends on the vapour pressure, the solubility and the temperature. The effects of temperature can be dealt with because it is easy to increase the vapour pressure of a compound by raising the temperature during the vaporization step. With the P T technique, the term percentage recovery is used. This is the amount of a compound which reaches the gas chromatograph for analysis relative to the amount which was originally present in the sample. If a sample contains 100 pg benzene and 90 pg reach the GC column, the percentage recovery is 90%. In the static headspace technique, a simple expression like this cannot be used because it is possible to use a large... 

A recent study published in the Chinese Journal of Instrumental Analysis, Fenxi Ceshi Xuebao, showed a detection limit of 500 ng of Sulfur Mustard (HD) by using accelerated solvent extraction-gas chromatography (ASE-GC) coupled with a flame photometric detector (EPD) in the sulfur mode, in soil. In this case, the study showed evidence that ASE results in better recoveries and sensitivity than liquid solid extraction (LSE) [50]. In 1996, a paper was published on a method for the analysis of Lewisite through derivatization of the compound before introduction into a gas chromatograph. In order to simplify the derivatization process, a tube packed with absorbent was used for collection of airborne vapors. If a positive response occurs when screening analytes using a GC coupled with an FPD, then the same sample can be analysed using a GC equipped with an AED for confirmation based on the elemental response to arsenic (in the case of Lewisite) and sulfur (in the case of Sulfur Mustard) within the appropriate GC retention time window [54]. 

Enzymes are usuaHy sensitive to harsh physical and chemical conditions, and care must be taken during recovery and purification to avoid inactivation of the enzyme. This demands careful selection of production processes and conditions for each individual enzyme. Different methods are subsequently appHed to assure the stabHity and activity of the enzymes during storage and appHcation. 

In comparison with classical processes involving thermal separation, biphasic techniques offer simplified process schemes and no thermal stress for the organometal-lic catalyst. The concept requires that the catalyst and the product phases separate rapidly, to achieve a practical approach to the recovery and recycling of the catalyst. Thanks to their tunable solubility characteristics, ionic liquids have proven to be good candidates for multiphasic techniques. They extend the applications of aqueous biphasic systems to a broader range of organic hydrophobic substrates and water-sensitive catalysts [48-50]. 

A ductile material can be stretched uniformly only when stable flow occurs. The stable flow of materials has been investigated by Hart who described the transition from the stable to unstable flow. The beginning of geometrical instability and localisation of strain is the limit of the stable flow. At temperatures above 0.5 T (at equilibrium between recovery and hardening) the strain rate sensitivity parameter "m" may be derived from the expression ... 

P-Endosulfan has also been measured in hand rinsings using GC/ECD (Kazen et al. 1974). Sample preparation involves hand rinses with hexane followed by concentration, fractionation, and clean-up with Florisil . Sensitivity, recovery, and precision data were not reported. 

Up on Florisil column and an elemental sulfur removal procedure are used to reduce or eliminate interferences. Sensitivity is in the sub-ppb range. Recoveries and precision are good. 

Purge-and-trap methods have also been used to analyze biological fluids for the presence of trichloroethylene. Breast milk and blood were analyzed for trichloroethylene by purging onto a Tenax gas chromatograph to concentrate the volatiles, followed by thermal desorption and analysis by GC/MS (Antoine et al. 1986 Pellizzari et al. 1982). However, the breast milk analysis was only qualitative, and recoveries appeared to be low for those chemicals analyzed (Pellizzari et al. 1982). Precision (Antoine et al. 1986) and sensitivity (Pellizzari et al. 1982) were comparable to headspace analysis. 

Selectivity and sensitivity of available instruments are tested in all laboratories in the initial step of validation. The crops used for fortification experiments and the concentration levels are identical in all laboratories. Recoveries are determined with all available detection techniques, but after discussion of the results each laboratory selects individually one valid result for each analyte-matrix-level combination. Only this result is used for the calculation of the final mean recovery and standard deviation. Typical criteria for the acceptance of methods are given in Table 11. 

If analytical methods are validated in inter-laboratory validation studies, documentation should follow the requirements of the harmonized protocol of lUPAC. " However, multi-matrix/multi-residue methods are applicable to hundreds of pesticides in dozens of commodities and have to be validated at several concentration levels. Any complete documentation of validation results is impossible in that case. Some performance characteristics, e.g., the specificity of analyte detection, an appropriate calibration range and sufficient detection sensitivity, are prerequisites for the determination of acceptable trueness and precision and their publication is less important. The LOD and LOQ depend on special instmmentation, analysts involved, time, batches of chemicals, etc., and cannot easily be reproduced. Therefore, these characteristics are less important. A practical, frequently applied alternative is the publication only of trueness (most often in terms of recovery) and precision for each analyte at each level. No consensus seems to exist as to whether these analyte-parameter sets should be documented, e.g., separately for each commodity or accumulated for all experiments done with the same analyte. In the latter case, the applicability of methods with regard to commodities can be documented in separate tables without performance characteristics. 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) consists of dipping a fiber into an aqueous sample to adsorb the analytes followed by thermal desorption into the carrier stream for GC, or, if the analytes are thermally labile, they can be desorbed into the mobile phase for LC. Examples of commercially available fibers include 100-qm PDMS, 65-qm Carbowax-divinylbenzene (CW-DVB), 75-qm Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CX-PDMS), and 85-qm polyacrylate, the last being more suitable for the determination of triazines. The LCDs can be as low as 0.1 qgL Since the quantity of analyte adsorbed on the fiber is based on equilibrium rather than extraction, procedural recovery cannot be assessed on the basis of percentage extraction. The robustness and sensitivity of the technique were demonstrated in an inter-laboratory validation study for several parent triazines and DEA and DIA. A 65-qm CW-DVB fiber was employed for analyte adsorption followed by desorption into the injection port (split/splitless) of a gas chromatograph. The sample was adjusted to neutral pH, and sodium chloride was added to obtain a concentration of 0.3 g During continuous... 

When developing or routinely using an analytical method, quality control (QC) fortifications can be added to each sample at critical points in the procedure to ensure that sensitive steps in the method were conducted properly and to pinpoint where problems occurred if results are less than satisfactory. For example, if the QC fortification samples for detection and cleanup were to show acceptable results in a batch of samples, but the extraction QC spike gave low recovery and/or high variability, then the analyst could modify instrument conditions or altering cleanup parameters immediately. Likewise, if the QC spike added just before analysis gives poor results, then instrument maintenance could be done and the samples merely re-analyzed rather than re-extracted. 

Method performance study All laboratories follow the same written protocol and use the same test method to measure a quantity (usually concentration of an analyte) in sets of identical test samples. The results are used to estimate the performance characteristics of the method, which are usually within-laboratory- and between-laboratory precision and - if relevant - additional parameters such as sensitivity, limit of detection, recovery, and internal quality control parameters (IUPAC Orange Book [1997, 2000]). 

Bergstrom et al. [63] used HPLC for determination of penicillamine in body fluids. Proteins were precipitated from plasma and hemolyzed blood with trichloroacetic acid and metaphosphoric acid, respectively, and, after centrifugation, the supernatant solution was injected into the HPLC system via a 20-pL loop valve. Urine samples were directly injected after dilution with 0.4 M citric acid. Two columns (5 cm x 0.41 cm and 30 cm x 0.41 cm) packed with Zipax SCX (30 pm) were used as the guard and analytical columns, respectively. The mobile phase (2.5 mL/min) was deoxygenated 0.03 M citric acid-0.01 M Na2HP04 buffer, and use was made of an electrochemical detector equipped with a three-electrode thin-layer cell. The method was selective and sensitive for mercapto-compounds. Recoveries of penicillamine averaged 101% from plasma and 107% from urine, with coefficients of variation equal to 3.68 and 4.25%, respectively. The limits of detection for penicillamine were 0.5 pm and 3 pm in plasma and in urine, respectively. This method is selective and sensitive for sulfhydryl compounds. 

---