Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Real data analysis tables

However, many of these tools, while enabling markedly faster and more detailed analysis than paper-based methods, still mimic static, one-by-one paperlike reports with no real-time auditing capability. Moreover, these COTS do not have integrated data analysis and automated data screening capabilities and are not optimized for systematic analyses. Furthermore, the ad hoc analyses that these COTS produce lack interactive, automatic auditing reproducible functions. Thus these tools are often used to produce the same dense, unwieldy paper tables of counts and percentages that were created manually before personal computers became ubiquitous. [Pg.651]

An analysis is conducted of the predicted values for each team member s factorial table to determine the main effects and interactions that would result if the predicted values were real data The interpretations of main effects and interactions in this setting are explained in simple computational terms by the statistician In addition, each team member s results are represented in the form of a hierarchical tree so that further relationships among the test variables and the dependent variable can be graphically Illustrated The team statistician then discusses the statistical analysis and the hierarchical tree representation with each team scientist ... [Pg.70]

A calibration curve shows the response of an analytical method to known quantities of analyte.8 Table 4-7 gives real data from a protein analysis that produces a colored product. A spectrophotometer measures the absorbance of light, which is proportional to the quantity of protein analyzed. Solutions containing known concentrations of analyte are called standard solutions. Solutions containing all the reagents and solvents used in the analysis, but no deliberately added analyte, are called blank solutions. Blanks measure the response of the analytical procedure to impurities or interfering species in the reagents. [Pg.69]

In the UK the Joint Food Science and Safety Group of the Department of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food have published the results of many analyses for chemical contaminants in food carried out under their Food Surveillance Programme. In many cases the raw data from these surveys are available for analysis. Table 2.1 lists the results of analyses for lead in some samples of cow, sheep and pig kidney obtained in Scotland and England.5 There are clear differences between species and some evidence of differences between sampling locations. What is not clear is the extent to which the variability observed is due to real and consistent differences between species and location or to normal biological variation. [Pg.22]

The example is illustrated by the results of Table 10.5. The Raman shift range from 400 to 2000 cm was calibrated with the 4-acetamidophenol shift standard, and the calibrated spectrum was recorded and stored on disk. Then calcium ascorbate was observed, with and without recalibration between spectra. Finally, spectra of calcium ascorbate were obtained approximately daily (each after recalibration) over a period of 2 months. The 769- and 1582 cm peaks were chosen for analysis, and their peak frequencies were determined by a center-of-gravity criterion included in the data analysis software (GRAMS 32). It is important that these qualification spectra duplicate the instrumental conditions to he used for real samples, at least as far as optical geometry, sampling mode, and calibration procedure. The objective is to provide an accurate indication of instrument performance in the intended application. [Pg.268]

It is possible to verify this fact from the Monte Carlo analysis results (Table 1) and to notice that its efficiency is similar to PIT for the first level of noise, which is the closer to real data. It is found that parameters have little influence over the final result. [Pg.462]

The data in Tables 34-1 through 34-5 show that we are well advised to adopt a critical attitude regarding the accuracy of analytical results on real samples, even if we perform the analysis ourselves. [Pg.1033]

For each parameter, the pH, DO (dissolved oxygen), ORP (oxidation-reduction potential), temperature, agitation speed, culture volume and pressure can be measured with sensors located in the fermenter. The output of the individual sensors is accepted by the computer for the on-line, continuous and real-time data analysis. Information stored in the computer control system then regulates the gas flow valves and the motors to the feed pumps. A model of a computer control system is shown in Fig. 11. The computer control systems, like the batch systems for mammalian cell culture, seem to level out at a maximum cell density of 10 cells/ml. It may be impossible for the batch culture method to solve the several limiting factors (Table 10) that set into high density culture where the levels are less than 10 cells/ml. [Pg.30]

For further analysis, some tests with real data on the developed multiagent model will be shown. We have chosen eight time series obtained from databases commonly used for forecasting (Box and Jenkins 1970 Abraham and Ledolter 1983). Table 3 shows,... [Pg.13]

The minimum absorption coefficients measured by TLS are of the order oflO - 10 cm", which corresponds, for strong absorbers (e> 10 M" cm" ), to minimal concentrations of ca. 10""-10" "M. Some recent data from real sample analysis by TLS are listed in Table 4. [Pg.748]

The reproducibihty for a series of measurements using a spiked real life spice sample with the application of above mentioned analyte protectant was determined on three consecutive days. The precision of the area results has been calculated as RSD (%). The peak area data in Table 4.26 indicate the good precision of the spiked spice sample analysis a low level spike of below 10 ppb. The reproducibility over three days for all compounds tested is in the range of 1-3%. [Pg.614]

Classes II and III include all tests in which the specified gas and/or the specified operating conditions cannot be met. Class II and Class III basically differ only in method of analysis of data and computation of results. The Class II test may use perfect gas laws in the calculation, while Class III must use the more complex real gas equations. An example of a Class II test might be a suction throttled air compressor. An example of a Class III test might be a CO2 loop test of a hydrocarbon compressor. Table 10-4 shows code allowable departure from specified design parameters for Class II and Class III tests. [Pg.418]

Ideal reactors can be classified in various ways, but for our purposes the most convenient method uses the mathematical description of the reactor, as listed in Table 14.1. Each of the reactor types in Table 14.1 can be expressed in terms of integral equations, differential equations, or difference equations. Not all real reactors can fit neatly into the classification in Table 14.1, however. The accuracy and precision of the mathematical description rest not only on the character of the mixing and the heat and mass transfer coefficients in the reactor, but also on the validity and analysis of the experimental data used to model the chemical reactions involved. [Pg.481]

Analysis of Stress—Optical Data. The slight, if indeed real, improvement of the isotropic model over the Takayanagi model would be of little consequence were it not for a more pronounced difference between the two models in their ability to describe the stress-optical data. When the parameters obtained from the dynamic data (Table IV) are substituted into Equations 8 and 9, Equation 8 produces results which are uniformly too low. Equation 9 also underestimates the magnitude of Ka but only by an average 7% (Figure 14). For most blends the discrepancy is less than 5%, and all calculated values show the characteristic elevation of the birefringence attributed to the multiphase structure. [Pg.220]

Comparison of blood serum samples analysis data, obtained with the use of urease-containing and proposed enzyme free sensors shows that the results are similar (Table 39.1). It confirms that using anion-exchange column provides good separation of the interfering compounds and analyte. Moreover it is worth taking into account that real samples contain compounds mentioned in Section 39.5 in lower concentrations than in the model solution. [Pg.1216]

Table 7.1 Technical data of a typical industrial real-time spectroscopic imaging system for material analysis and sorting (SI system - technical data)... Table 7.1 Technical data of a typical industrial real-time spectroscopic imaging system for material analysis and sorting (SI system - technical data)...

See other pages where Real data analysis tables is mentioned: [Pg.245]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.1935]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.166]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.81 , Pg.82 , Pg.83 ]




SEARCH



Real data

© 2024 chempedia.info