Radioactive wastes nuclear accidents

The worst nuclear accident occurred in 1951 in Russia when radioactive waste from Pu production was dumped into a lake. 

Americium is released into surface water primarily from plutonium production reactors, nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities, or in nuclear accidents. It may also be released from radioactive waste storage facilities. Since 241Pu decays into 241 Am,241 Am is also released as a result of 241Pu releases. Water sampling data were used to estimate effluent releases from the SRS from the plant s start up in... 

Nuclear power produces spent fuel that contains radionuclides that will emit radiation for hundreds and thousands of years. At present, they are being stored underground indefinitely in heavy, shock-proof containers. These containers could be stolen or may corrode with time, or leak as a result of earthquakes and tremors. Transportation and reprocessing accidents could cause environmental contamination. One solution is for the United States to go to breeder reactors, as has been done in other countries, to reduce the level and amount of radioactive waste. 

Highly publicized nuclear accidents such as those that occurred at Chernobyl and Three Mile Island must be considered anomalies. Nuclear power plants have multiple safety measures in place to prevent radiation leaks. The small amount of radioactive waste produced by nuclear reactors is controlled and usually contained in the plant facility. 

In the United States, however, the public perception of nuclear energy is less than favorable. There are formidable disadvantages, including the creation of radioactive wastes and the possibility of an accident that releases radioactive substances into the environment. In rebuttal, advocates point out that we cannot insist that nuclear fission energy be absolutely safe while at the same time accept tanker spills, global warming, acid rain, and coal-miner diseases. 

However, there are problems. The main problem associated with a nuclear power station is that the reactor produces highly radioactive waste materials. These waste materials are difficult to store and cannot be disposed of very easily. Also, leaks of radioactive material have occurred at various sites throughout the world. Accidents at a small number of nuclear power stations, such as Three Mile Island in the US (1979) and Chernobyl in the Ukraine (1986) have led to a great deal of concern about their safety. More recently, in March 2011 a major nuclear accident happened at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in northern Japan. On this occasion the accident was not caused as a result of the plant itself undergoing a problem, but as a result of an earthquake near Japan that gave rise to a tsunami. This damaged essential... 

Nuclear fusion does not require uranium fuel and does not produce radioactive waste, and has no risk of explosive radiation-releasing accidents, but it takes place at a temperature of several million degrees. Nuclear fusion occurs in the sun, its fuel is hydrogen and, as such, it is an inexhaustible and a clean energy source. The problem with this technology is that, because it operates at several million degrees of temperature, its development is extremely expensive, and it will take at least until 2050 before the first fusion power plant can be built (Tokomak fusion test reactors). It is estimated that it will be 50 times more expensive than a regular power plant, and its safety is unpredictable. In short, the only safe and inexpensive fusion reactor is the Sun ... 

Besides, radioactive cobalt is a common radionuclide in liquid wastes from nuclear facilities, and natural erionite is a good exchanger for 60Co2+. Studies carried out with this material reveal its possibilities in the elimination of radioactive cobalt from solutions [73], The exchange of 232Th4+ in natural clinoptilolite and mordenite from liquid solutions has also been studied [74], All these peculiarities of natural zeolites make it suitable to be exploited as natural barriers for the migration of radionuclides and, consequently, natural zeolite deposits can be potential sites for a radioactive waste repository [19]. These materials have also been employed for the removal of radionuclides from polluted areas in places where nuclear power station accidents have occurred or where... 

Under accident-free haulage of NSs, Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships (NPSSs), Reactor Compartment (RC) units, nuclear Maintenance Vessels (MVs) and Radioactive Waste (RW) as well as during defueling operations the radiation impact on population is virtually lacking, and the radiation risk does not exceed an unconditionally acceptable level of 110 [1]. However in a case of emergency the radiation risk would increase potentially reaching 6010 - 7000 10 that would be unacceptable for population (acceptable risk < 50T0 [1]) (Table. 2). 

Besides the analysis of nuclear fuel and of radioactive waste materials, the determination of contamination and enrichment of selected radioactive nuclides, e.g., which is one of the most important environmental indicators of nuclear accidents, Se, Tc, Np, Pu, °Pu and "Am at ultratrace concentration levels, is useful for environmental monitoring of fallout from nuclear weapons testing, nuclear power plants or nuclear accidents. ". Selected application fields for the determination of natural and artificial long-lived radionuclides (LLR) and radionuclides investigated by mass spectrometric techniques are summarized in Tables 9.36 and 9.37, respectively. 

Fission products of uranium and other actinides are released to the environment during weapons production and testing, and by nuclear accidents. Because of their relatively short half-lives, they commonly account for a large fraction of the activity in radioactive waste for the first several hundred years. Important fission products are shown in Table 3. Many of these have very short half-lives and do not represent a long-term hazard in the environment, but they do constitute a significant fraction of the total released in a nuclear accident. Only radionuclides with half-lives of several years or longer represent a persistent environmental or disposal problem. Of primary interest are °Sr, Tc, and... 

Botov N. G. (1992) ALWP-67 A little-known big nuclear accident. In High Level Radioactive Waste Management, Proceedings of the Third International Conference, April 12-16, 1992. Las Vegas, Nevada. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 2331-2338. 

Safety Series No. 98 On-site Habitability in the Event of an Accident at a Nuclear Facility (1989). Semenov, B.A. and Oi, N., Nuclear fuel cycles adjusting to new realities. IAEA Bulletin, 3 (1993) 2. Semenov, B.A., Disposal of spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste building international consensus. IAEA Bulletin, 3 (1992) 2. 

Unlike burning fossil fuels, nuclear reactions do not produce pollutants such as carbon dioxide and acidic sulfur and nitrogen compounds. However, the nuclear reactions do form highly radioactive waste that is hard to dispose of safely. Other serious problems include the potential release of radioactive materials into the environment when fires or explosions take place, and also the limited supply of fissionable fuel and the higher cost of producing electricity using nuclear fuels rather than fossil fuels. Nuclear reactors that have experienced serious accidents are shown in Figure 21.13. 

Radiological Hazards. Adversaries and even terrorist could spread radioactive material in an effort to deny US forces access to key terrain, roads, and buildings. The use of radiation dispersal devices and destruction of local nuclear reactors by terrorists are examples of radiological threats. Other radiological hazards present during deployments may include improperly dumped waste and accidents involving radioactive commodities. 

Very large instantaneous doses (> 10 Gy) occur in explosions of nuclear weapons, in accidents involving nuclear reactors, or from carelessness in working with accelerators, X-ray equipment or radioactive installations (e.g. Co sources used for technical and therapeutic purposes), criticality accidents, and in handling unshielded strong radiation sources or unshielded radioactive waste. Such doses are very unlikely to be received in work involving amounts of 1 GBq of radioactivity. 

---