Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Power plant, fusion

The fear of accidents like Chernobyl, and the high cost of nuclear waste disposal, halted nuclear power plant construction in the United States m the 1980s, and in most ol the rest ol the world by the 1990s. Because nuclear fusion does not present the waste disposal problem of fission reactors, there is hope that fusion will be the primary energy source late in the twenty-first centuiy as the supplies of natural gas and petroleum dwindle. [Pg.481]

Sizes and thicknes.ses to which no Standard designation applies are largely the more commonly used dimensions to which Taylor B orge Electric Fusion Welded Pipe is produced for a wide variety of applications including river crossings, penstocks, power plant and other piping. [Pg.589]

C22-0130. List the advantages and disadvantages of fission power and fusion power. Based on your list, do you think that the United States should continue to develop fission power plants What about fusion power plants ... [Pg.1623]

In the future, when nuclear fusion power plants are in operation, most of these disadvantages will not be a concern. Fusion reactions produce only short-lived isotopes and so there would be no long-term storage problems. An added advantage is that there is a virtually inexhaustible supply of deuterium fuel in the world s oceans. [Pg.384]

One can consider other energy options. For example, to supply 40 to 60 Terawatts of energy via nuclear fission is possible, it could be done. However it necessitates increasing by almost a factor of x500 the number of nuclear power plants ever built. The consequence of such demand is that we would soon deplete earth s uranium supplies. Breeder reactors are an un-stable possibility, like mixing matches, children, and gasoline. Depending upon ones viewpoint fusion remains either a to be hoped for miracle, or an expensive civil-works project. [Pg.555]

There are great technological hurdles to overcome in creating an economically viable nuclear fusion power plant. Countries, therefore, are teaming up to develop nuclear fusion energy so as to pool their financial and intellectual resources. [Pg.704]

Fission, on the other hand, is the splitting of a nucleus into parts. This also gives off a lot of energy. Most nuclear power plants in use today use fission reactions, which are easier to contain within the power plant—and therefore are safer—than fusion reactions. Nuclear fission occurs when isotopes of certain elements are hit with neutrons. The following reaction shows what happens to uranium-235 when a neutron hits it. [Pg.21]

Explosions can be used for constructive purposes, such as mining and road building for entertainment, such as fireworks or for destructive purposes, such as military weapons and terrorist bombs. They may be either deliberate or accidental. Explosive materials must always be handled with extreme care to prevent accidents. Such caution must be exercised with not only industrial explosives, but also commonly encountered materials such as fireworks, laboratory and industrial chemicals, and flammable gases, see also Fire, Fuels, Power Plants Fireworks Kinetics Nuclear Fission Nuclear Fusion Thermodynamics. [Pg.76]

Nuclear fusion does not require uranium fuel and does not produce radioactive waste, and has no risk of explosive radiation-releasing accidents, but it takes place at a temperature of several million degrees. Nuclear fusion occurs in the sun, its fuel is hydrogen and, as such, it is an inexhaustible and a clean energy source. The problem with this technology is that, because it operates at several million degrees of temperature, its development is extremely expensive, and it will take at least until 2050 before the first fusion power plant can be built (Tokomak fusion test reactors). It is estimated that it will be 50 times more expensive than a regular power plant, and its safety is unpredictable. In short, the only safe and inexpensive fusion reactor is the Sun ... [Pg.18]

Never mind. In the center of the Sun is the core, the Sun s power plant in which nuclear fusion reactions turn hydrogen into helium and generate tremendous amounts of heat. Here, the gas density is more than 100 times that of water, or 14 times that of lead. In fact, the core contains 40 percent of the solar mass. 2 Sir, at that density, why isn t the core a solid ... [Pg.95]

In a conventional power plant the molecular energy of fuel is released by combustion process. The function of the work-producing device is to conv part of the heat of combustion into mechanical energy. In a nuclear power pis the fission or fusion process releases the energy of the nucleus of the atom heat, and then this heat is partially converted into work. Thus, the thermodyna analysis of heat engines, as presented in this chapter, applies equally well conventional (fossil-fuel) and nuclear power plants. [Pg.135]

With ITER we will obtain the proof of principle that the magnetic confinement concept allows to gain energy from controlled thermonuclear fusion processes. It is seen as the last step before a first power plant will be built. On this way some problems have still to be solved, in particular, a power plant has to operate continuously for months, rather than the pulsed operation in present tokamaks or in ITER with 8 minutes burn time. For long time operation two requirements are crucial ... [Pg.3]

In this section the crucial problems of plasma-wall interaction are discussed, which need to be solved in order to achieve a high availability of a fusion power plant. [Pg.4]

Ward D.J., Cook I., Knight P.J., Proceedings of the 18th Fusion Energy Conference, 2000, IAEA-CN-77/FTP2/20 and Ward D.J., Cook I., Taylor N.P., Power Plant Conceptual Study (PPCS) Stage II... [Pg.27]

In 1989, the scientific community was startled by the announcement of two chemists that they had succeeded in causing a fusion reaction to occur near room temperature. This coldfusion would have enabled the population of the Earth to be supplied with almost limitless energy without the radioactivity associated with the operation of ordinary nuclear power plants. The effect on the scientific and economic communities was profound. Unfortunately, so far, the results reported by the scientists have not been repeated or confirmed, and cold fusion is still a dream. [Pg.583]


See other pages where Power plant, fusion is mentioned: [Pg.462]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.747]    [Pg.871]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.3]   


SEARCH



Fusion power

Fusion power plant cost

Power plants

© 2024 chempedia.info