Radical formation, rate

Ljungstrom, E., and M. Hallquist, Nitrate Radical Formation Rates in Scandinavia, Atmos. Emiron., 30, 2925-2932 (1996). 

Smith and Ewart calculated the number of particles having been formed at the end of the first stage of polymerization. The number of particles is affected by the initiator decomposition rate (or radical formation rate) and total surface area of emulsifier to stabilize polymer-monomer particles. Smith and Ewart concluded that the number of particles is proportional to the 0.4 power of the initiator concentration and the 0.6 power of the emulsifier concentration, assuming that the surface area of total polymer-monomer particles is equal to the total surface area of emulsifier molecules when the last micelle disappears. 

Moreover, the ratios of free radical formation rates ... 

Iron solubility is an obvious factor in Fenton oxidation because the rate of hydroxyl radical formation is directly proportional to [Fe2+]. At elevated pH values, iron hydroxides and oxides form and precipitate, causing a dramatic decrease in hydroxyl radical formation rate. Iron chelators can be used to offset this factor. A related issue is the rate of Fe3 + reduction to Fe2+, which, if insufficient, can result in Fe2+ concentrations that are too low to... 

This last point emphasizes a weakness in the Fenton literature pointed out previously. Often, the rate of peroxide decomposition is assumed to be proportional to the hydroxyl radical formation rate. Flowever, nonhydroxyl radical-forming pathways and the formation of radicals that are not accessible to pollutants may significantly decrease the yield of useable hydroxyl radical. 

A rigorous derivation of the unusual time dependencies and of eq 16 for k,y = 0 was first found for the reversible radical generation of Scheme 2 with the restriction AtR = Ac,15 which was removed subsequently.1617 The mathematical method will be outlined in section IV. For the mechanism of Scheme 8, with equal radical formation rates and AtY = 0, it provides for the radical concentrations at sufficiently long times18... 

Here v, is the free radical formation rate or ion formation rate and ki is the rate constant for termination or recombination. 

The data allows us to propose the following mechanism of styrene polymerization in the presence of peroxide initiators and aliphatic mercaptans the regulator interacts with the initiator forming organic acids, disulfides and other products disulfides in their turn begin interactions with the initiators but at a lower rate than mercaptans this reaction is proceeded by the faster consumption of the benzoyl peroxide in the presence of different mercaptans, but there was no increase of radical formation rate. 

The hydroxyl radical is able to cause injury in biological systems, e.g. biomembranes can be deteriorated. Titanium is able to bind H2O2 in a Ti H202 complex. This complex can trap the superoxide radical which is formed during the H2O2 decomposition. By spectrophotometric spintrapping measurements and electron spin resonance measurements no hydroxyl radical formation rate in Ti-H202 could be detected. A similar result was observed with Zr, Au and Al [18]. 

Viscosity is an important factor during ultrasound-induced bulk polymerizations as the long polymer chains formed upon reaction cause a drastic increase in the viscosity of the reaction mixture, thereby hindering cavitation and consequently reducing the production rate of radicals. Precipitation polymerization forms a potential solution to this problem, because a constant viscosity and hence a constant radical formation rate can be maintained. In this perspective, high-pressure carbon dioxide is an interesting medium as most monomers have a high solubility in CO2, whereas it exhibits an anti-solvent effect for most polymers. ... 

In ultrasound-induced polymerization reactions, the viscosity has a large influence on the radical formation rate. Therefore, it is important to monitor the viscosity during these reactions. By coupling the overall heat transfer coefficient U to the viscosity of the reaction mixture, the influence of the C02-concentration on the viscosity of polymer solutions has been deter-... 

Temperature. When the reaction temperature is altered, the liquid properties will change. Although all these properties (viscosity, surface tension, soimd velocity, vapor pressure, etc) have an influence on the chemical effect of cavitation, the change in vapor pressure dominates the other liquid properties. As the temperature is raised, the vapor pressure in the bubble is increased, which cushions the implosion of the cavity. This results in a lower local temperature inside the cavity at higher overall temperatures. Consequently, fewer radicals are formed per cavitation bubble. On the other hand, a higher vapor pressure can lead to easier bubble formation because of the decrease of the cavitation threshold. In most cases, however, an increase in reaction temperature will result in an overall decrease in the radical formation rate. Therefore, ultrasound-induced reactions exhibit opposite behavior as compared to common radical reactions (20). 

Ultrasound Intensity. At first the radical formation rate will increase to a maximum with increasing ultrasound intensity (18). This is caused by the higher cavitation intensity per bubble and the larger number of cavitation bubbles. At too high ultrasound intensities, however, a cloud of cavitation bubbles is formed near the ultrasound source, because of which the pressure wave is no longer transmitted efficiently to the liquid. As a result, the cavitation intensity and, consequently, the radical formation rate decrease with a continued increase in intensity (18). An optimum radical formation rate with ultrasound intensity can thus be foimd. 

Ultrasound Frequency. The frequency of ultrasoimd has a significant effect on the cavitation process. At very high frequencies (>1 MHz), the cavitation effect is reduced as the inertia of a cavitation bubble becomes too high to react to fast changing pressures. Most ultrasoimd-induced reactions are therefore carried out at frequencies between 20 and 900 kHz. The optimum ultrasoimd effect as a function of frequency depends on the reaction system eg, water dissociation has an optimum frequency at approximately 500 kHz (21). For bulk pol5mierizations the maximum radical formation rate is obtained at 20 kHz. At this frequency the highest strain rates are produced, which results in a high radical formation rate by polymer scission (22). 

Fig. 7. Radical formation rate constants from monomer and poljmier as a function of the wt% polymer dissolved at a temperature of 20°C and an ultrasound intensity of 62 W/cm (30).bMMA PMMA.

Precipitation Poiymerization. As described in the previous section, ultrasound-induced bulk polymerizations are limited to relatively low conversions, because a strong viscosity increase upon reaction hinders cavitation. To obtain higher conversions, precipitation polymerization forms a potential soln-tion. Because the produced polymer precipitates from the reaction medium, the viscosity and consequently the radical formation rate are expected to remain virtually constant. In this perspective, liquid carbon dioxide is a suitable reaction medium, because most monomers have a high solubility in CO2, whereas it exhibits an antisolvent effect for most polymers. Moreover, CO2 is regarded as an environmentally friendly compound, which is nontoxic, nonflammable, and naturally abundant. Since higher pressures are required for CO2 to act as an antisolvent (31-33), the possibility of ultrasound-induced cavitation in pressurized carbon dioxide systems has been studied (34). 

Because of the extreme conditions during a cavitation event, radicals can be formed. Several parameters affect cavitation and thereby the polymerization reaction, since the radical formation rate is directly influenced by the cavitational collapse. The number of radicals formed due to sonification is a function of the number of cavities created and the number of radicals that are formed per cavitation bubble. The bubble wall velocity during collapse and the hot-spot temperature determine the rate at which radicals are formed, both inside and outside a single bubble. These two parameters depend on the physical properties of the liquid as well as on the physical and chemical processes occurring around the cavity. The most important properties and processes occurring in a cavitation bubble are depicted schematically in Figure 21.10. The number of cavities is determined, for instance, by the impurities in the liquid, the static pressure, the ultrasound intensity, and the vapor pressure. This emphasizes the complexity of the influences on the overall... 

---