Quality assurance risk assessment

G2 Start Exeention (SE) Agree on requirements and project plan. This gate assesses the required effort, time and cost, procedures for quality assurance, risk management, configuration management, etc. 

Quantitative risk assessment is now used extensively for determination of chemical and microbial risks in food. This concept helps to systematically and scientifically judge whether certain hazardous compounds may reach unacceptable risk levels when ingested. Quantitative risk assessment can support both quality design and quality assurance but, we discuss it from the assurance perspective. In the past decade, much attention has been paid to assessment of microbial risks due to then-typical differences as compared to chemical risks ... 

The concept of risk assessment requires a profound understanding of food dynamics and technological conditions that may impact the risk levels of certain hazardous compounds. It requires that scientific information and data are collected to underpin conclusions about risk levels. Risk assessment can be used to scientifically underpin the selection of hazards that must be covered by a quality or safety assurance system (e.g., HACCP) that will improve the reliability of the system. 

GMP risk assessment Qualified/trained resource System life-cycle validation System environment Current specifications Software quality assurance Formal testing/acceptance Data entry authorization Data plausibility checks Communication diagnostics Access security Batch release authority Formal procedures/contracts Change control Electronic data hardcopy Secure data storage Contingency/recovery plans Maintenance plans/records... 

After a period of mushrooming with many national varieties, GMP and validation have entered a phase of global consolidation. The concept of GMPs has converged on the quality systems approach rather than having quality assurance as the unique custodian of quality in addition to being an internal police force. Validation has become accepted as a tool to be used with common sense instead of a cover-it-all paper exercise. Risk assessment has been identified as the important core activity controlling the extent and depth of validation. 

However, be aware that in spite of the usefulness of the MIB-1 antibody in assessing the rate of cell proliferation, the classification of cancers (e.g., breast cancer) by the size of the primary tumor and the presence and extent of lymph node metastases does not adequately explain differences in the clinical outcome of individual patients. Cell proliferation indices are commonly used, along with other diagnostic parameters, to estimate the risk of recurrence of a cancer for individual patients. Therefore, it is important to understand the relationship between various indices of proliferation such as MIB-1 labeling index and detection by either in situ hybridization or polymerase chain reaction. This approach will lead to quality assurance in diagnosis. 

The 1996 Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) now requires that an additional safety factor of 10 be used in the risk assessment of pesticides to ensure the safety of infants and children, unless the EPA can show that an adequate margin of safety is assured with out it (Scheuplein, 2000). The rational behind this additional safety factor is that infants and children have different dietary consumption patterns than adults and infants, and children are more susceptible to toxicants than adults. We do know from pharmacokinetics studies with various human pharmaceuticals that drug elimination is slower in infants up to 6 months of age than in adults, and therefore the potential exists for greater tissue concentrations and vulnerability for neonatal and postnatal effects. Based on these observations, the US EPA supports a default safety factor greater or less than 10, which may be used on the basis of reliable data. However, there are few scientific data from humans or animals that permit comparisons of sensitivities of children and adults, but there are some examples, such as lead, where children are the more sensitive population. It some cases qualitative differences in age-related susceptibility are small beyond 6 months of age, and quantitative differences in toxicity between children and adults can sometimes be less than a factor of 2 or 3. 

QAPP QRA Quality Assurance Program Plan quantitative risk assessment... 

In summary, and at the risk of repetition, it must be stressed that the development of analytical methodology for the assessment of human exposure to pesticides is a complex process. Careful attention to planning of the research is of utmost importance. As much information as possible about transformation, storage and excretion of the pesticides of interest should be gathered. Preliminary work should focus on the analytical behavior of parent compounds and metabolites. The combination of these aspects with reliable analytical standards and a sound quality assurance program should yield valid analytical methodology. 

Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) A system of procedures, checks, and audits to judge and control the quality of measurements and reduce the uncertainty of data. Some quality control procedures include having more than one person review the findings and analyzing a sample at different times or using different laboratories to see if the findings are similar Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) A process that relies on mathematical modeling and estimations usually derived from animal test results and the probability of risk for a chemical substance at the low dose to which the human population is normally exposed Radionuclide A nuclide with radioactive properties... 

---