Protection layer method

The simplest method is the protection of the back side of a glass substrate for single-sided etching as described in Sect. 9.1.4. It is of particular importance for the production of nozzles for filling in or pushing out fluids in microfluidic systems. The diameter of the underside of the nozzles (outlet) is, caused by the protection layer, see once more Fig. 9.14, smaller than the diameter at the top side (inlet). 

Thin metal layers, such as chromium layers, can also be used as protection layers. They can be deposited covering the entire sample using vapour deposition techniques. Additional lithographic structuring of the metal layer is required for the selective protection of the substrate. 

The production of geometrical structures with various defined depths using the protection layer technology involves the following sequence of machining processes  

Mechanical treatment of the substrate material using grinding and polishing to create high quality sheets with flat and parallel surface of optical quality. 

Thermal treatment of the photosensitive glass that was exposed to UV irradiation to induce the partial crystallisation of these exposed areas. 

---

Trofimov, D.A., Shkinev. V.M., Spivakov, B.Ya. and Schue, F. 2009. Improvement of pore geometry and performances of poIy(ethylene terephthalate) track membranes by a protective layer method using plasma-induced graft polymerization of lH,lH,2H-perfluoro-1-octene monomer. 

Ultramodern techniques are being applied to the study of corrosion thus a very recent initiative at Sandia Laboratories in America studied the corrosion of copper in air spiked with hydrogen sulphide by a form of combinatorial test, in which a protective coat of copper oxide was varied in thickness, and in parallel, the density of defects in the copper provoked by irradiation was also varied. Defects proved to be more influential than the thickness of the protective layer. This conclusion is valuable in preventing corrosion of copper conductors in advanced microcircuits. This set of experiments is typical of modern materials science, in that quite diverse themes... combinatorial methods, corrosion kinetics and irradiation damage... are simultaneously exploited. 

This type of corrosion can take place on any new surface of zinc and is best prevented by storing the metal in a dry, airy place until a protective layer has been formed. Zinc which has been properly aged in this way is safe against white-rust formation. Various methods are employed to prevent white rust. A chromate treatment is widely used for zinc-plated articles and for galvanised sheet, and occasionally for zinc die castings. Fatty substances, such as oils or lanolin, are sometimes used to protect larger items. 

For formation of anticorrosive and adhesion-improving protective layers on metals the cleaned surface is treated with aqueous acidic solution containing molybdate, chromium fluoride, phosphate, acetate, and Zn ions. As dispersant a mixture of 60% alkali salt of a phosphate ester, 20% alkylpolyglucoside, and 20% fatty alcohol ethoxylate was applied. This method passivates the metal surface by formation of an anticorrosive and protective layer that improves adhesion of subsequent coatings. 

Current world chlorate production (about 700 kilotons per year) is based entirely on an electrochemical method where reactions (15.21) to (15.34) occur simultanously in undivided cells. A small amount of bichromate ions are added to the solution to reduce chlorate losses by rereduction at the cathode these form a thin protective layer at the cathode which passivates the reduction of chlorate and hypochlorite ions. 

Electrochemical methods of protection rest on different precepts (1) electroplating of the corroding metal with a thin protective layer of a more corrosion-resistant metal, (2) electrochemical oxidation of the surface or application of other types of surface layer, (3) control of polarization characteristics of the corroding metal (the position and shape of its polarization curves), and (4) control of potential of the corroding metal. 

Depending on the material type and construction method, the saturated hydraulic conductivities for these barrier layers are typically between 1 x 10-5 and 1 x 10-9 cm/s. In addition, conventional cover systems generally include additional layers, such as surface layers to prevent erosion protection layers to minimize freeze/thaw damage internal drainage layers and gas collection layers.6 22... 

LOPA is a semi-quantitative tool for analyzing and assessing risk. This method includes simplified methods to characterize the consequences and estimate the frequencies. Various layers of protection are added to a process, for example, to lower the frequency of the undesired consequences. The protection layers may include inherently safer concepts the basic process control system safety instrumented functions passive devices, such as dikes or blast walls active devices, such as relief valves and human intervention. This concept of layers of protection is illustrated in Figure 11-16. The combined effects of the protection layers and the consequences are then compared against some risk tolerance criteria. 

In LOPA the consequences and effects are approximated by categories, the frequencies are estimated, and the effectiveness of the protection layers is also approximated. The approximate values and categories are selected to provide conservative results. Thus the results of a LOPA should always be more conservative than those from a QRA. If the LOPA results are unsatisfactory or if there is any uncertainty in the results, then a full QRA may be justified. The results of both methods need to be used cautiously. However, the results of QRA and LOPA studies are especially satisfactory when comparing alternatives. 

Layer-of-protection analysis (LOPA) A method, based on event tree analysis, of evaluating the effectiveness of independent protection layers in reducing the likelihood or severity of an undesired event. 

Layers-of-protection analysis (LOPA) is a semiquantitative methodology for analyzing and assessing risk. It is typically applied after a qualitative hazards analysis has been completed, which provides the LOPA team with a listing of hazard scenarios with associated safeguards for consideration. LOPA uses simplified methods to characterize the process risk based on the frequency of occurrence and consequence severity of potential hazard scenarios. The process risk is compared to the owner/operator risk criteria. When the process risk exceeds the risk criteria, protection layers are identified that reduce the process risk to the risk criteria. 

In general, risk reduction is accomplished by implementing one or more protective layers, which reduce the frequency and/or consequence of the hazard scenario. LOPA provides specific criteria and restrictions for the evaluation of protection layers, eliminating the subjectivity of qualitative methods at substantially less cost than fully quantitative techniques. LOPA is a rational, defensible methodology that allows a rapid, cost-effective means for identifying the protection layers that lower the frequency and/or the consequence of specific hazard scenarios. 

Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) Scenario- based Order-of- magnitude By preidentified scenario Processes likely to require independent protection layers, such as safety instrumented systems, to meet predefined risk criteria Dependent on comprehensiveness of scenario list identified by other method(s) Higher... 

Reference [20] notes that any such system should be easy to learn and use, accurate, easy to update, flexible, well based and linked to existing design methods and tools. It should recognise innovation, include diverse environments and be acceptable to all partners in the construction process. The authors point out that the clear statement of assumptions enables them to limit the number of factors. Apart from the environment and the material, joints, contact with other materials and local movement all provide sites for degradation. Protective layers help provided that they remain intact, but degradation proceeds rapidly once they are penetrated. 

The greatest advantage of the Taylor dispersion method compared to the STM method for analyzing the entire nanoparticle size involving the protective layer is that the entire size can be directly measured in the solution, when the surrounding molecules on the surface of naked metal nanoparticles rapidly exchange with those free in the solution. In addition, although the envelope molecules like surfactants can form free micelles without metal nanoparticles, only the envelope molecules with metal nanoparticles can be measured by the Taylor dispersion method because the diffusion was detected by the UV-Vis absorption of the metal nanoparticles (see Fig. 9.1.7). 

Emulsification is a stabilizing effect of proteins a lowering of the interfacial tension between immiscible components that allow the formation of a protective layer around oil droplets. The inherent properties of proteins or their molecular conformation, denaturation, aggregation, pH solubility, and susceptibility to divalent cations affect their performance in model and commercial emulsion systems. Emulsion capacity profiles of proteins closely resemble protein solubility curves and thus the factors that influence solubility properties (protein composition and structure, methods and conditions of extraction, processing, and storage) or treatments used to modify protein character also influence emulsifying properties. 

Reinforcings may be coated with a protective layer of grease that must be removed by an environmentally suitable method using either a locally approved solvent or a chemical alkaline wash. Gross scale and welding scatter must be mechanically removed. 

---