Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dispersion Taylor

Popular methods for mutual diffusion measurements in fluid systems are the Taylor dispersion method and interferometric methods, such as Digital Image Holography [13, 14]. [Pg.165]

L. Taylor dispersion monitored by electrospray mass spectrometry a novel approach for studying diffusion in solution. Rapid Commun. Mass Spearom. 2002, 16, 1454-1462. [Pg.154]

Taylor s dispersion is one of the most well-known examples of the role of transport in dispersing a flow carrying a dissolved solute. The simplest setting for observing it is the injection of a solute into a slit channel. The solute is transported by Poiseuille s flow. In fact this problem could be studied in three distinct regimes (a) diffusion-dominated mixing, (b) Taylor dispersion-mediated mixing and (c) chaotic advection. [Pg.2]

Our goal is the study of reactive flows through slit channels in the regime of Taylor dispersion-mediated mixing and in this chapter we will develop new effective models using the technique of anisotropic singular perturbations. [Pg.3]

In order to calculate the hydrodynamic size (Stokes size) of metal nanoparticles with the surrounding envelope, the Taylor dispersion method has been proposed (50). Since metal nanoparticles can be detected by UV-Vis absorption in this method, only the size of the particles involving metal nanoparticles can be determined (Fig. 9.1.7). [Pg.442]

The greatest advantage of the Taylor dispersion method compared to the STM method for analyzing the entire nanoparticle size involving the protective layer is that the entire size can be directly measured in the solution, when the surrounding molecules on the surface of naked metal nanoparticles rapidly exchange with those free in the solution. In addition, although the envelope molecules like surfactants can form free micelles without metal nanoparticles, only the envelope molecules with metal nanoparticles can be measured by the Taylor dispersion method because the diffusion was detected by the UV-Vis absorption of the metal nanoparticles (see Fig. 9.1.7). [Pg.443]

Fig. 9.1.7 Image of the colloidal dispersions of the envelopes with and without metal nanoparticles. Light scattering can measure the average size of both envelopes, and the Taylor dispersion method can do only the size of the envelopes with metal nanoparticles. Fig. 9.1.7 Image of the colloidal dispersions of the envelopes with and without metal nanoparticles. Light scattering can measure the average size of both envelopes, and the Taylor dispersion method can do only the size of the envelopes with metal nanoparticles.
Shape factors of a different sort are involved in the Taylor dispersion problem. With parabolic flow at mean speed U through a cylindrical tube of radius R, Taylor found that the longitudinal dispersion of a solute from the interaction of the flow distribution and transverse diffusion was R2U2/48D. The number 48 depends on both the geometry of the cross-section and the flow profile. If, however, we insist that the flow should be laminar, then the geometry of the cross-section determines the flow and hence the numerical constant in the Taylor dispersion coefficient. [Pg.39]

In Reprint C in Chapter 7, the behavior of a tracer pulse in a stream flowing through a packed bed and exchanging heat or matter with the particles is studied. It is shown that the diffusion in the particles makes a contribution to the apparent dispersion coefficient that is proportional to v2 fi/D. The constant of proportionality has one part that is a function of the kinematic wave speed fi, but otherwise only a factor that depends on the shape of the particle (see p. 145 and in equation (42) ignore all except the last term and even the suffixes of this e, being unsuitable as special notation, will be replaced by A. e is defined in the middle of p. 143 of Chapter 7). In this equation, we should not be surprised to find a term of the same form as the Taylor dispersion coefficient, for it is diffusion across streams of different speeds that causes the dispersion in that case just as it is the diffusion into stationary particles that causes the dispersion in this.7 What is surprising is that the isothermal diffusion and reaction equation should come up, for A is defined by... [Pg.59]

Howard Brenner has generalized the method to a whole class of phenomena in his magisterial paper, A general theory of Taylor dispersion phenomena. Physicochem. Hydrodyn. 1, 91-123 (1980). [Pg.59]

Recycle-flow Coanda-effect Mixing Based on Taylor Dispersion Most Relevant Citations... [Pg.243]

The use of the Coanda effect is based on the desire to have a second passive momentum to speed up mixing in addition to diffusion [55, 163], The second momentum is based on so-called transverse dispersion produced by passive structures, which is in analogy with the Taylor convective radial dispersion ( Taylor dispersion ) (see Figure 1.180 and [163] for further details). It was further desired to have a flat ( in-plane ) structure and not a 3-D structure, since only the first type can be easily integrated into a pTAS system, typically also being flat A further design criterion was to have a micro mixer with improved dispersion and velocity profiles. [Pg.243]

Figure 1.180 (a) Mixing in a capillary tube by Taylor dispersion. [Pg.245]

A reactive dispersion model based on the Taylor dispersion model was proposed, which predicts a change of speed if the tracer impulse consists of reactants which react at the walls of the channel (see Figures 3.89 and 3.90). [Pg.491]

In composite plastic microchannels, there is an additional problem of extra dispersion (Taylor dispersion) in EOF which is caused by the difference in zeta potentials of the different materials forming the channels [258]. Caged fluorescent dye (fluorescein bis[5-carboxymethyoxy-2-nitrobenzyl]ether dipotassium salt) was used to visualize the greater dispersion obtained in acrylic or composite channels due to non-uniformity in the surface charge density [259]. [Pg.45]

This equation allows one to consider the cumulative distribution of small-intestinal transit time data with respect to the fraction of dose entering the colon as a function of time. In this context, this equation characterizes well the small-intestinal transit data [173, 174], while the optimum value for the dispersion coefficient D was found to be equal to 0.78 cm2 s 1. This value is much greater than the classical order of magnitude 10 5 cm2 s 1 for molecular diffusion coefficients since it originates from Taylor dispersion due to the difference of the axial velocity at the center of the tube compared with the tube walls, as depicted in Figure 6.5. [Pg.127]


See other pages where Dispersion Taylor is mentioned: [Pg.213]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.125]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.21 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 , Pg.510 , Pg.514 , Pg.516 , Pg.517 , Pg.559 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.243 , Pg.491 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.150 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.157 , Pg.164 , Pg.166 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 , Pg.9 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.57 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1971 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.201 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.363 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.113 , Pg.114 , Pg.115 , Pg.118 , Pg.121 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info