Protection criteria application

Aluminum-sheathed cables should not be connected to other cables because aluminum has the most negative rest potential of all applicable cable sheathing materials. Every defect in the protective sheath is therefore anodically endangered (see Fig. 2-5). The very high surface ratio SJS leads to rapid destruction of the aluminum sheathing according to Eq. (2-44). Aluminum can also suffer cathodic corrosion (see Fig. 2-11). The cathodic protection of aluminum is therefore a problem. Care must be taken that the protection criterion of Eq. (2-48) with the data in Section 2.4 is fulfilled (see also Table 13-1). Aluminum-sheathed cables are used only in exceptional cases. They should not be laid in stray current areas or in soils with a high concentration of salt. 

Figure 20.3c shows the effect of application of cathodic protection on carbonated concrete. The applied cathodic current density, even if it brings about only a small lowering of the steel potential, can produce enough alkalinity to restore the pH to values higher than 12 on the reinforcement surface and thus promote passivation. The effectiveness of cathodic protection in carbonated concrete was studied with specimens with alkaline concrete, carbonated concrete and carbonated concrete with 0.4% chloride by cement mass that were tested at current densities of 10, 5, and 2 mA/m (of steel surface) [45]. Carbonated concrete specimens polarised at 10 mA/m showed that, although initially protection was not achieved since the four-hour decay was slightly lower than 100 mV, after about four months of polarization, the protection criterion was fulfilled and higher values, in the range 200-300 mV of the four-hour potential decay were measured (Figure 20.6). The same results were obtained on carbonated and slightly chloride-contaminated concrete.

Criteria 2 to 6 are pragmatic criteria which are only applicable to qualitative explanations. These criteria only give qualitative information which is dealt with further below (Section 3.3.3.1). Criterion 7 gives better information with potential test probes (see Section 3.3.3.2). In all the criteria it must be remembered that only mixed potentials can be measured for extended objects to be protected [see the explanation to Eqs. (3-19) and (3-28)]. Criteria 5 and 6 are particularly to be observed for objects [22]. A comparison of the different criteria in field experiments has shown that, besides Criterion 1, good results are obtained with Criterion 3 [26]. 

The application of sacrificial anodes for the protection of structures requires the development of suitable anode materials for the exposure environment. Screening tests enable the rapid selection of materials which show potential as candidates for the given application. These tests may typically use a single parameter (e.g. operating potential at a defined constant current density) as a pass/fail criterion and are normally of short duration (usually hours) with test specimen weights of the order of hundreds of grams. The tests are not intended to simulate field conditions precisely. 

Mechanical strength becomes an important criterion, because wound cells (spiral-type construction), in which a layer of separator material is spirally wound between each two electrodes, are manufactured automatically at very high speed. Melt-blown polypropylene fleeces, with their excellent tensile properties, offer an interesting option. Frequently two layers of the same or different materials are used, to gain increased protection against shorts for button cells the use of three layers, even, is not unusual. Nevertheless the total thickness of the separation does not exceed 0.2 - 0.3 mm. For higher-temperature applications (up to about 60 °C) polypropylene fleeces are preferred since they offer a better chemical stability, though at lower electrolyte absorption [ 114"]. 

Having introduced matters pertaining to the electrochemical series earlier, it is only relevant that an appraisal is given on some of its applications. The coverage hereunder describes different examples which include aspects of spontaneity of a galvanic cell reaction, feasibility of different species for reaction, criterion of choice of electrodes to form galvanic cells, sacrificial protection, cementation, concentration and tempera lure effects on emf of electrochemical cells, clues on chemical reaction, caution notes on the use of electrochemical series, and finally determination of equilibrium constants and solubility products. 

Applications of PCM cover many diverse fields. As mentioned before, the most important selection criterion is the phase change temperature. Only an appropriate selection ensures repeated melting and solidification. Connected to the melting and solidification process is the heat flux. The range of heat flux in different applications covers a wide range from several kW for space heating with water or air, domestic hot water and power plants to the order of several W for temperature protection and transport boxes (Figure 124). 

As stated, rules are applied in order of their priority. Additionally, when a rule is matched and applied to a certain location, that location is protected from any further change until every other rule (in the rules set) is tested for application. Once all the rules have been tested, all protection is removed from the array, and the whole cycle of selection, application, and protection of affected locations is repeated. In some, this iterative application of rules is repeated for a predetermined number of cycles. It is, however, conceivable to use a different criterion for termination of growth, such as lack of change. 

Visibly clean is not an acceptable cleaning criterion. A detailed, sequential cleaning procedure is advisable, for surfaces inside and outside laboratory chemical hoods and ventilated weighing enclosures. If settling of powder occurs on the floor, this indicates that material is escaping and that additional administrative and personal protective controls are warranted when using chemical fume hoods for subdivision applications. 

The contaminant chosen for this application is a trace compound, such as mercury (Hg). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999) sets the Criteria Maximum Concentration (CMC) for mercury in fresh water at 1.4 pg/l and the Criterion Continuous Concentration (CCC) at 0.77 pg/l. Given the three types of contaminant sources available in three-dimensional MRTM, this application seeks... 

In order to minimize water related damage, the primary purpose of protective agents is the reduction of the spontaneous uptake of moisture. With respect to the WTA recommendations for hydrophobations [2] a compound is considered to be effective if residual water uptakes < 30 % (relative to the untreated material) are obtained. As illustrated in Fig. 3 this criterion cannot be realized for all the combinations mentioned emphasizing that the application of a universal protective agent is not feasible. 

An application factor was used to derive an interim freshwater quality criterion for nitrocellulose (NC) [74], This chemical was not toxic to several species of fish, invertebrates, and algae, but had an EC50 of 554.3 pmoles I. to the freshwater alga P. subcap-itata. The value proposed for the protection of freshwater aquatic life was 47.9 pmoles I., approximately 10-fold below the lowest measured toxicity value. However, due to NC s lack of solubility in water, it is speculated if the phytotoxicity is due to adverse effects of the chemical per se or to obscuration of the test solution by the presence of excessive NC. No criteria have been proposed for the protection of marine life. 

As is true of utility/industrial application and novelty as well, each of the provisions for non-obviousness and inventive step are similar. It is, therefore, the wording and interpretation of each nation s criterion that is critical because it ultimately determines if an invention is patentable within that jurisdiction. These variations in national patent criteria may cause an invention to be denied patent protection in one country while being granted such protection in another. 

The criteria for cathodic protection are not free from criticism. It is beheved that all the listed criteria are deficient to some extent and therefore qualitative in practical appKcation. However, one should be optimistic that any level of cathodic polarization is beneficial, and a broad range of ca-thodically applied potentials will yield adequate protection. As a result, the use of any criterion listed in Table 4 [24] will produce adequate cathodic protection if applied judiciously. The amount of cathodic protection should be sufficient to reduce the corrosion rate to an acceptable range. Caution should be exercised to avoid overprotection. Overprotection results in the premature consumption of sacrificial anodes or excessive amounts of impressed current demands. Moreover, the application of too much cathodic protection can result in damage to the structure to be protected as a result of hydrogen embrittlement. 

AR340 1.53 Application of the single-failure criterion to nuclear power plant protection systems,... 

The limitation on applicability of both El and Cl to analytes that are thermally stable and volatile can be alleviated by chemical derivatization to protect any highly polar functional groups within the analyte molecule. However, introduction of such an additional step into the overall quantitative method can introduce analyte losses and will also reduce throughput in cases where the latter is an important criterion. 

The abundance of natural and man-made polymers provides a wider scope for the choice of shell material, which may be made permeable, semi-permeable or impermeable. Permeable shells are used for release applications, while semi-permeable capsules are usually impermeable to the core material but permeable to low molecular-weight liquids. Thus, these capsules can be used to absorb substances from the environment and to release them again when brought into another medium. The impermeable shell encloses the core material and protects it from the external environment Hence, to release the content of the core material the shell must be ruptured by outside pressure, melted, dried out dissolved in solvent or degraded under the influence of light (see Chapter 7). Release of the core material through the permeable shell is mainly controlled by the thickness of the shell wall and its pore size. The dimension of a microcapsule is an important criterion for industrial applications the following section will focus on spherical core-shell types of microcapsules (Fig. 1.8). 

---