Systems interface with process safety

This book is intended for persons from various industries who are interested in making safer products and systems. It should be very useful to those new to the system safety discipline who would like to understand the basic terms used in the discipline. It is also intended for the system safety engineers who actually apply the system safety process in their daily jobs. I have written this book for engineers, analysts, and managers who are confronted with the many unique terms used in the system safety discipline as they interface with system safety engineers. 

The tables S 1 and S 2 in this example are dealing only with the first level criterion suitability assurance and one part of the aspects of the first level criterion product assurance , i.e. with software quality assurance. The other part of the criterion product assurance is verification and validation, V V, which also has to be broken down in more detailed criteria. Also the other first level criteria of tables 3, 4 and 5, i.e. dociunentation, product safety, system safety, interface, compensation by operating experience, error reporting, and modification should be detailed into appropriate levels of refinement. Examples for this process can be foimd in [7]. 

The SIS logic solver is a PLC, which is specifically designed for safety applications. It is type approved to comply with the lEC 61508 series up to SIL 3. It has input and output interfaces for safety-related process signals and communication with other safety PLC s. It also has interfaces for signals and oommunioation which are not safety-related. The system consists of ... 

In this section, you will be introduced to process safety and be provided with some background, some unique definitions, an overview of the U.S. OSHA and ERA rules that are applicable to U.S. industry, and be shown the interface of system and process safety. There is also a chapter on the ERA rule that is akin to the OSHA Rrocess Safety Management (RSM) rule. Further, there is a chapter that discusses the implementation of the PS. Finally, there is a concluding chapter that discusses PS reviews, both external and internal, to ensure that the process remains safe, but also that improvements are periodically made to enhance operations as well as safety. 

It cannot be overemphasized that the O SHA is an extremely valuable analytical tool that concentrates on the human interface with the system from both operations and maintenance standpoints. Therefore, because of the critical requirement of ensuring that operations and maintenance personnel are protected from any hazards in their tasks, the importance of a properly performed O SHA is of paramount concern in the system safety analysis process. 

Major safety issues related to offshore ESD and process shutdown (PSD) systems need to maintain set points for process values to provide process precondition alarm, to indicate that the process is going out of range and malfunctions in the system might have set in. Fire and gas systems (FGSs) are designed to be self-contained. However, process interlocks such as partial closing of the ventilation fire damper are necessary. So, FGS needs to interface with process systems. 

Minimum deployment impact The safety development process included in the framework shall be compatible and synchronized with ABB s BDM and introduce none or minimum overhead to the current BU s product development practices. No changes to the current quality management system (QMS) shall be required to use the framework. Interfaces with quality management and project management models shall be clearly defined in order to avoid overlaps between activities. 

For process control applications the Siemens S7-400F series of safety certified PLCs includes the Profisafe communication system which allows safety data to be transmitted within the Profibus DP message flames. Field networks are then permitted to transmit control and safety critical data over the same media. Remote I/O modules include an AS interface gateway certified for safety duties. The network software and safety interface products have been certified by TUV for SIL-3 duties in accordance with lEC 61508. 

Effective human-machine interfaces for systems important to safety are necessary to provide the operator with accurate, complete and timely information on plant status and to enable proper operation of the systems controlled by the l C systems. The Requirements for Design require that systematic consideration of human factors and the human-machine interface be included in the design process (Ref. [1], para. 5.50). The human-machine interface for I C systems important to safety should conform to the guidance given in Section 6 of this Safety Guide. 

Using the simulated biodiesel production process as case study, basically Jeerawongsuntom and team (2011) integrated the human-machine interface with HAZOP analysis for safety protection. Safety instmmented system was developed to create interlocks such as automatic shutdown to prevent the system from being exposed to extreme or... 

Independent Safety Assessor (ISA) The purpose of the ISA is to serve an independent role in the safety certification process, and to interface with stakeholders, vendors, subcontractors, consultants, and all other specialty engineering participants throughout the system life cycle. The ISA helps to prepare the safety certifiable items list described below, and prepares the documentation for certification of those items throughout the process. The ISA will conduct audits of the vendors, subcontractors, and consultants throughout the process, and report findings to the stakeholders accordingly. 

---