Process hazard analysis performance

Perform process hazards analysis Perform management of change review... 

A PHA has heen performed for new facilities. The management of change documentation packages and referenced documents should indicate when a process hazard analysis was performed for the modification or new facility. The PSSR Team should verify all of the PHA recommendations have been implemented or otherwise resolved before the toll process can be judged ready to operate. 

For new facilities, the initial process hazard analysis (PHA) has been performed and recommendations have been resolved. ... 

An initial process hazard analysis (PrHA) is performed on the processes, appropriate to the complexity to identify, evaluate and control the hazards, Employers determine the pr conducting process hazard analyses based on a rationale which includes such consider extent of the ss hazards, number of potentially affected employees, age of the pro ... 

The OSHA investigation13 found that (1) no process hazard analysis had been performed in the polyethylene plant, and as a result, many serious safety deficiencies were ignored or overlooked (2) the single-block (DEMCO) valve on the settling leg was not designed to fail to a safe closed position when the air failed (3) rather than relying on a single-block valve, a double-... 

V Process hazard analysis (PHA) must be performed by a team of experts, including engineers, chemists, operators, industrial hygienists, and other appropriate and experienced specialists. The PHA needs to include a method that fits the complexity of the process, a hazards and operability (HAZOP) study for a complex process, and for less complex processes a less rigorous process, such as what-if scenarios, checklists, failure mode and effects analysis, or fault trees. 

Careful process hazards analysis may show that a particular vessel need not be designed to withstand a full vacuum (e.g., if the maximum attainable vacuum is limited to the performance characteristics of an exhauster). Whatever the vacuum rating, rated vessels must be periodically inspected to ensure that internal or external corrosion has not diminished the vessel strength. 

In 1993, the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) published Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Processes (referred to henceforth as Safe Automation). Safe Automation provides guidelines for the application of automation systems used to control and shut down chemical and petrochemical processes. The popularity of one of the hazard and risk analysis methods presented in Safe Automation led to the publication of the 2001 Concept Series book from CCPS, Layer of Protection Analysis A Simplified Risk Assessment Approach. This method builds upon traditional process hazards analysis techniques. It uses a semiquantitative approach to define the required performance for each identified protective system. 

Neither the OSHA PSM Standard nor the EPA RMP regulation explicitly requires specific hazards, such as reactive hazards, to be examined when performing a process hazard analysis. 

The process hazard analysis required by OSHA PSM is an example of a performance-based approach it allows for a variety of hazard analysis methodologies. A performance-based system requires experts to identify and evaluate all relevant reactive hazards of a process and to determine the complexity of the hazards analysis. If the hazard evaluation demonstrates the possibility of a catastrophic consequence, the process has regulatory coverage. This approach to hazard evaluation allows for both a comprehensive analysis and flexibility in implementation however, if applied to reactive hazards, it requires expertise for implementation and regulatory evaluation. 

Plant management would have been required to perform a process hazard analysis (PHA) for the entire listed chemical process. 

The process hazard analysis can be a starting point for the selection of fire scenarios. The process hazard analysis can be reviewed to develop a list of scenarios that result in fire as a consequence. Generic release sizes for small, medium, and large releases have been proposed as shown in Table 5-1 (Spouge, 1999). This saves time by eliminating the need to develop a detailed scenario. The analyst can use these release sizes to perform fire modeling calculations and determine the impact by moving the release point locations. The release criteria are considered to be representative of scenarios that could reasonably be expected to occur. 

A reactive chemicals/process hazard analysis (PHA) to be completed every three years (see Reference 11). Special consideration may be given to facilities that have lower levels of process risk and which have demonstrated superior safety performance to extend this frequency up to five years. Facilities that pose higher process risk or who have lower safety performance may be recommended to have reactive chemicals/PHA reviews more frequent than every three years. In certain countries, government regulation will determine the frequency and other requirements for Process Hazard Analysis reviews. Dow will follow the government requirements where they are more stringent. 

Process Hazard Analysis (PHA). Employers must perform an analysis to identify, evaluate, and control hazards on processes covered by this standard. The process hazard analysis shall be appropriate to the complexity of the process and shall identify, evaluate, and control the hazards involved in the process. The OSHA standard specifies a number of issues that the analysis must address, as well as requirements for who must conduct the analysis, how often it must be performed, and response to its findings. Methodologies that are appropriate include ... 

The project manager is responsible that a process hazard analysis review has been performed for a project. In this respect the other team members provide support and assistance. The manager or engineer, directs and controls the other members as he would for any other aspect of the project or facility management. 

The third major element is Process Hazards Analysis (PHA) [29 CFR 1910.119 (e)]. This element requires performing one of several types of analyses... 

Potential emergency situations may initially be identified by a properly performed Process Hazards Analysis (PHA). Other sources of potential events include incident reports as well as user or plant experience with similar processes or equipment at your plant or other plants. Various CCPS Guidelines contain additional information on process hazards analysis and quantitative risk analysis. ... 

The OSHA standard requires that aU pertinent information be provided to employees involved in (1) compiling Process Safety Information, (2) performing Process Hazards Analysis, (3) developing... 

Select analysis method for each process hazard analysis to be performed... 

At this point in development, the safety requirements and constraints are documented and traced to the design features used to implement them. A hazard log contains the hazard information (or links to it) generated during the development process and the results of the hazard analysis performed. The log will contain embedded links to the resolution of each hazard, such as functional requirements, design constraints, system design features, operational procedures, and system limitations. The information documented should be easy to collect into a form that can be used for the final safety assessment and certification of the system. 

---