Process evolution

The commercial manufacture of polystyrene was batch mode through the 1930s and 1940s, with a gradual transition to continuous bulk polymerization beginning in the 1950s. Suspension polymerization was a common early polystyrene production process, where a single reactor produced a polymer slurry that had to be separated from the water and dried. This process was ideal for free radical 

As a means to improve the rubber utilization, a bulk/suspension process evolved, whereby polybutadiene rubber was dissolved in styrene monomer and polymerized in bulk beyond phase inversion before being dropped into suspension. The HIPS produced this way had two distinct advantages over the compounded version styrene to rubber grafting and discrete rubber spheres or particles uniformly dispersed in a polystyrene matrix. This improved the impact strength dramatically per unit of rubber and gave better processing stability, because the rubber phase was dispersed instead of being co-continuous with the polystyrene. 

Before true continuous reactor trains became common, many were operated in a semi-continuous mode. Typically, there were three or four reactors in series and the styrene would be polymerized to a certain degree of conversion and transferred to the next vessel. This would allow reactants to be transferred into the vacated vessel and batch polymerization begun. This scheme was successful in normal operation, but a surge vessel was needed in case there was a problem with any of the reactors in sequence. 

In GPPS systems, these peroxides mainly supplemented the free radicals generated by thermal initiation, whereas in the HIPS process, it was found that they could enhance the grafting of styrene to unsaturated rubbers, such as polybutadiene. Additional benefits of organic peroxide initiators were increased production per unit reactor volume, reduction of styrene oligomers and lower reactor temperatures. The instantaneous removal of peroxide feed to a runaway reactor also provides a safety mechanism. Peroxide-initiated systems have higher reaction rates owing to shorter reactor residence times, so the ability to remove one source of radical initiation quickly is important. 

HIPS is produced by two basic variants the batch process and the continuous process. Pre-polymerization, i.e. the polymerization phase up to completion of phase inversion, is identical in the two process variants. After completion of the pre-polymerization, the polymerization is continued in suspension in the batch process and in solution in the continuous process. The batch process is, therefore, also referred to as the bulk suspension process and the continuous variant as the solution process. The continuous process is a refinement of the original I.G. Farben process for standard polystyrene, which The Dow Chemical Company has adapted to the needs of rubber-containing styrene solutions. A number of modifications are now practiced. 

---

Rohlin, L., Oh, M.K., and Liao, J.C., Microbial pathway engineering for industrial processes evolution, combinatorial biosynthesis and rational design, Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4, 330, 2001. 

Gunn, D. J. (1982) IChemE Symposium Series No. 74,99, A versatile method of flow sheet analysis for process evolution and modification. 

The flow-through cathode is the result of a tailored-to-the-process evolution of the GDE structure, which is available also in two additional configurations double-sided (originally developed for fuel cell servicing) and single-sided (see Fig. 9.7). The double-sided type is particularly suited for the electrochemical process where the product should not be released on to the back surface of the cathode, as in the case of oxygen-depolarised chlor-alkali electrolysis, discussed in Section 9.3. 

Impulse for the valuation of the chamomile collection has become if the identification of four chemical types of this plant species different by the qualitative -quantitative composition of chemical compounds in the essential oil was carried out by Schilcher in 1987 (Table 7.6). This veiy important fact was referred to chamomile biodiversity. This biodiversity was created during long time process (evolution) inregardtoinfluenceofeco-physiological conditions (biotic-andabiotic-factors) on the concrete place of chamomile population growth. 

In the past, CRM has often been both perceived and tackled ERP style , i.e., large rollouts of complete integrated packages that led to expensive, monolithic projects. But CRM, by its very nature, is much more diverse in its functionality, more dynamic in its process evolution, and less clear in its organizational ownership (Fig. 23.8). Clear focus on the most beneficial functionalities and an evolutionary roadmap allow better learning and more flexibility when implementing CRM. This suggests three key questions to be answered up front ... 

Reduce the cost of chemical intermediates by improving existing chemistry. Troubleshooting frequently provided leads for process evolution and also ideas leading to better chemistry for the conversion of fermentation products to chemical intermediates—for example, cephalosporin C to 7-ACA. Again, product quality is the most important guiding parameter. 

In order to obtain a description of the dynamics after the fast transient, we first recognize that the equations describing the process evolution in the fast time scale can be replaced, in the time scale t, by the corresponding quasi-steady-state constraints. These constraints are obtained by multiplying Equation (5.10) by i and considering the limit e — 0. Taking into account (5.13), the constraints that must be satisfied in the slow(er) time scale(s) are... 

The random process input variables represent those variables that influence the process evolution, but they can hardly be influenced by any external action. Frequently, the random input variables are associated with deterministic input variables when the latter are considered to be in fact normal randomly distributed variables with mean Xj, j = 1, N ( mean expresses the deterministic behaviour of variable Xj) and variance j = 1, N. So the probability distribution function of the Xj variable can be expressed by the following equation ... 

The exit variables that present an indirect relation with the particularities of the process evolution, denoted here by Cj,l = 1,Q, are recognized as intermediary variables or as exit control variables. The exit process variables that depend strongly on the values of the independent process variables are recognized as dependent process variables or as process responses. These are denoted by y ,i = 1, P. When we have random inputs in a process, each y exit presents a distribution around a characteristic mean value, which is primordially determined by the state of all independent process variables Xj, j = 1, N. Figure 1.1 (b), shows an abstract scheme of a tangential filtration unit as well as an actual or concrete picture. 

Figure 3.47 shows the evolution of the heating process of the composite block and how it attains a complex steady state structure with the surface zones covered by complicated isothermal curves (see also Fig. 3.46). Secondly, this figure shows how the brick with the higher thermal conductivity is at steady state and remains the hottest during the dynamic evolution. As explained above, this fact is also shown in Fig. 3.46 where all high isothermal curves are placed in the area of the brick with highest thermal conductivity. At the same time an interesting vicinity effect appears because we observe that the brick with the smallest conductivity does not present the lowest temperature in the centre (case of curve G compared with curves A and B). The comparison of curves A and B, where we have X = 0.2, with curves C and D, where X = 0.4, also sustains the observation of the existence of a vicinity effect. In Fig. 3.48, we can also observe the effect of the highest thermal conductivity of one block but not the vicinity effect previously revealed by Figs. 3.46 and 3.47. If we compare the curves of Fig. 3.47 with the curves of Fig. 3.48 we can appreciate that a rapid process evolution takes place between T = 0 and T = 1. Indeed, the heat transfer process starts very quickly but its evolution from a dynamic process to steady state is relatively slow.

Figure 3.62 shows the temperature field of a quarter of the radial section of the reactor before the reaction firing. Combining the values of Tq, T, and Bi results in an effective cooling of the reactor near the walls during the initial instants of the reaction (T = 0 — 0.05). In Fig. 3.63 is shown the temperature field when the dimensionless time ranges between T = 0.05 and T = 0.11. Here, the reaction runaway starts and we can observe that an important temperature enhancement occurs at the reactor centre, at the same time the reactant conversion increases (Fig. 3.64). The evolution of the reaction firing and propagation characterize this process as a very fast process. We can appreciate in real time that the reaction is completed in 10 s. It is true that the consideration of isothermal walls can be criticized but it is important to notice that the wall temperature is not a determining factor in the process evolution when the right input temperature and the right input concentrations of reactants have been selected.

As analyzed in the preceding chapters concerning the description of a process evolution, stochastic modelling follows the identification of principles or laws related to the process evolution as well as the establishment of the best mathematical equations to characterize it. 

This statement can also be obtained when a transport process evolution is analyzed by the concept of Markov chains or completely connected chains. The math-... 

When a stochastic process takes place, the passage from one elementary process to another is caused by external effects. These effects are related to the medium by the process evolution itself We can assert that a process can be adapted to stochastic modelling if we can identify the elementary process components . In addition, for the connection process the number of states has to be same as the process components . This very abstract introduction will be better explained in the next paragraph by including a practical example. 

The objective of the description of a process evolution, considering mainly the specific internal phenomena, is to precede the elementary processes (elementary states) components. 

Polystochastic models are used to characterize processes with numerous elementary states. The examples mentioned in the previous section have already shown that, in the establishment of a stochastic model, the strategy starts with identifying the random chains (Markov chains) or the systems with complete connections which provide the necessary basis for the process to evolve. The mathematical description can be made in different forms such as (i) a probability balance, (ii) by modelling the random evolution, (iii) by using models based on the stochastic differential equations, (iv) by deterministic models of the process where the parameters also come from a stochastic base because the random chains are present in the process evolution. 

The practical example given below illustrates this type of process evolution and its solution. Here, we consider a displacement process such as diffusion with v(t). The process presents a variance cr(v) and a mean value m(v) whereas X(t) is an associated process which takes scalar values given by ... 

If the process takes place along the z-axis, then we can write that X = z. Considering now that and e j2 are the average or mean probabilities for the process evolution with +v or -v states at the z position, we can observe a similitude between system (4.106) and Eqs. (4.31) and (4.32) that describe the model explained in the preceding paragraphs. The solution of the system (4.106) [4.5] is given in Eq. (4.107). It shows that the process evolution after a random movement depends not only on the system state when the change occurs but also on the movement dynamics ... 

Some restrictions are imposed when we start the application of limit theorems to the transformation of a stochastic model into its asymptotic form. The most important restriction is given by the rule where the past and future of the stochastic processes are mixed. In this rule it is considered that the probability that a fact or event C occurs will depend on the difference between the current process (P(C) = P(X(t)e A/V(X(t))) and the preceding process (P (C/e)). Indeed, if, for the values of the group (x,e), we compute = max[P (C/e) — P(C)], then we have a measure of the influence of the process history on the future of the process evolution. Here, t defines the beginning of a new random process evolution and tIt- gives the combination between the past and the future of the investigated process. If a Markov connection process is homogenous with respect to time, we have = 1 or Tt O after an exponential evolution. If Tt O when t increases, the influence of the history on the process evolution decreases rapidly and then we can apply the first type limit theorems to transform the model into an asymptotic... 

The conditions specified by Eq. (6.206) provide the conditions required to design the model, also called similarity requirements or modeling laws. The same analysis could be carried out for the governing differential equations or the partial differential equation system that characterize the evolution of the phenomenon (the conservation and transfer equations for the momentum). In this case the basic theorem of the similitude can be stipulated as A phenomenon or a group of phenomena which characterizes one process evolution, presents the same time and spatial state for all different scales of the plant only if, in the case of identical dimensionless initial state and boundary conditions, the solution of the dimensionless characteristic equations shows the same values for the internal dimensionless parameters as well as for the dimensionless process exits . 

N.A. Korovessis and T.D. Lekkas, Solar Saltworks Production Process Evolution— Wetland Function in Saltworks Preserving Saline Coastal Ecosystems, Proc. of the 6th Conf. on Environ. Sci. Technology, Pythagorion, Samos, pp. 11—30, Sept. 1, 1999. 

From the UML model, code is generated to customize the functionality provided by the AHEAD system. For example, the project manager may instantiate only the domain-specific classes and associations defined in the class diagrams. The core system as presented in this section enforces consistency with the process model definition. In this way, we can make sure that design proceeds according to the domain-specific model. A more flexible approach will be discussed in the next section (extending process evolution beyond consistency-preserving instance-level evolution). 

Our work is based on a conceptual framework which distinguishes four levels of modeling (Fig. 3.74). Each level deals with process entities such as products, activities, and resources. Here, we focus on activities, even though our framework equally applies to products and resources. Process evolution may occur... 

In principle, process evolution may be considered at all levels of our conceptual framework though we assume a static meta model here to avoid frequent changes of the process management system itself. 

The example below shows a process evolution roundtrip During the execution of the design process, changes are performed which introduce inconsistencies with respect to the process definition. In response to this problem, an improved version of the process definition is created. Finally, the process instance is migrated to the new definition. In contrast to the previous section, we will deal with a different part of the overall reference process, namely the design of the separation (Sec. 1.2). 

The process evolution roundtrip is closed by propagating the changes at the... 

---