Probabilistic mathematical approaches

To put equation 44-6 into a usable form under the conditions we wish to consider, we could start from any of several points of view the statistical approach of Hald (see [10], pp. 115-118), for example, which starts from fundamental probabilistic considerations and also derives confidence intervals (albeit for various special cases only) the mathematical approach (e.g., [11], pp. 550-554) or the Propagation of Uncertainties approach of Ingle and Crouch ([12], p. 548). In as much as any of these starting points will arrive at the same result when done properly, the choice of how to attack an equation such as equation 44-6 is a matter of familiarity, simplicity and to some extent, taste. 

Fora recent survey of reactive and stochastic chemical batch scheduling approaches, the reader is referred to Floudas and Lin [2], For a survey of the different types of probabilistic mathematical models that explicitly take uncertainties into account, see Sahinidis [12]. For detailed information about stochastic programming and its applications, the reader is referred to the books of Birge and Louveaux [9], Ruszczynski and Shapiro [10], or Wallace and Ziemba [26]. 

Guidance for selecting an appropriate mathematical approach for a given exposure scenario (deterministic versus probabilistic) and guidance regarding conduct of acceptable probabilistic assessments. 

In the first chapter several traditional types of physical models were discussed. These models rely on the physical concepts of energies and forces to guide the actions of molecules or other species, and are customarily expressed mathematically in terms of coupled sets of ordinary or partial differential equations. Most traditional models are deterministic in nature— that is, the results of simulations based on these models are completely determined by the force fields employed and the initial conditions of the simulations. In this chapter a very different approach is introduced, one in which the behaviors of the species under investigation are governed not by forces and energies, but by rules. The rules, as we shall see, can be either deterministic or probabilistic, the latter leading to important new insights and possibilities. This new approach relies on the use of cellular automata. 

Any analysis of risk should recognize these distinctions in all of their essential features. A typical approach to acute risk separates the stochastic nature of discrete causal events from the deterministic consequences which are treated using engineering methods such as mathematical models. Another tool if risk analysis is a risk profile that graphs the probability of occurrence versus the severity of the consequences (e.g., probability, of a fish dying or probability of a person contracting liver cancer either as a result of exposure to a specified environmental contaminant). In a way, this profile shows the functional relationship between the probabilistic and the deterministic parts of the problem by showing probability versus consequences. 

Let us fit the probabilistic model, = P0 + ru, to the same data (see Figure 5.10). If the least squares approach to the fitting of this model is employed, the appropriate matrices and results are exactly those given in Section 5.2 where the same model was fit to the different factor levels xu = 3, yn = 3, xl2 = 6, yl2 = 5. This identical mathematics should not be surprising the model does not include a term for the factor xx and thus the matrix of parameter coefficients. A", should be the same for both sets of data. The parameter / 0 is again estimated to be 4, and ar2 is estimated to be 2. 

Stochastic analysis presents an alternative avenue for dealing with the inherently probabilistic and discontinuous microscopic events that underlie macroscopic phenomena. Many processes of chemical and physical interest can be described as random Markov processes.1,2 Unfortunately, solution of a stochastic master equation can present an extremely difficult mathematical challenge for systems of even modest complexity. In response to this difficulty, Gillespie3-5 developed an approach employing numerical Monte Carlo... 

Simplistic and heuristic similarity-based approaches can hardly produce as good predictive models as modern statistical and machine learning methods that are able to assess quantitatively biological or physicochemical properties. QSAR-based virtual screening consists of direct assessment of activity values (numerical or binary) of all compounds in the database followed by selection of hits possessing desirable activity. Mathematical methods used for models preparation can be subdivided into classification and regression approaches. The former decide whether a given compound is active, whereas the latter numerically evaluate the activity values. Classification approaches that assess probability of decisions are called probabilistic. 

The mathematical kinetic models proposed by Korobov. Korobov [96] has discussed the limitations of the traditional geometric-probabilistic approach to describing solid state reaction kinetics. He proposes that some of the more recently developed mathematical techniques (see Section 6.8.5.) should be used to provide improved descriptions of the advance of the reaction fi"ont within the structural symmetry of an individual reactant. 

Brownian motion of particles is the governing phenomenon associated with transitions between states in the above examples as well as in the mathematical derivations in the following [4, p.203]. If we consider a particle as system and the states are various locations in the fluid which the particle occupies versus time, then the transition from one state to the other is treated by the well-known random walk model. In the latter, the particle is moving one step up or down (or, alternatively, right and left) in each time interval. Such an approach gives considerable insight into the continuous process and in many cases we can obtain a complete probabilistic description of the continuous process. 

Correlation energy probabilistic approach. Recalling the quantum mechanical interpretation of the wave function as a probability amplitude, we see that a product form of the many-body wave function corresponds to treating the probability amplitude of the many-electron system as a product of the probability amplitudes of individual electrons (the orbitals). Mathematically, the probability of a composed event is only equal to the probability of the individual events if the individual events are independent (i.e., uncorrelated). Physically, this means that the electrons described by the product wave function are independent.30 Such wave functions thus neglect the fact that, as a consequence of the Coulomb interaction, the electrons try to avoid... 

Finally, one may use either stochastic (probabilistic) or deterministic models. In fact, a population of microbial cells is always segregated and structured, and its growth and reproduction should be treated stochastically. On the other hand, the biological knowledge and mathematical tools necessary for the formulation and study of a completely general model do not exist, and a less general approach gives useful results. 

A common approach to deal with model uncertainty is model set expansion (Zio and Apostolakis, 1996). According to this approach, the characteristics of the system under consideration are analyzed and models are created in an attempt to emulate the system based on goodness-of-fit criteria (Reinert and Apostolakis, 2006). The models may use different assumptions and require different inputs. These models are then combined to produce a meta-model of the system. Several methods have been proposed regarding the construction of the meta-model. AU rely on expert opinion. In the Bayesian approach, the combination of the individual models is carried out using Bayes theorem (Droguett and Mosleh, 2008). This method is theoretically very attractive dne to its mathematical rigor and ability to incorporate both objective and subjective information in a probabilistic representation. 

The present paper will put forward the point that a Bayesian framework may be viewed as rather natural for tackling issues (a) and (b) altogether. Indeed, beyond the forceful epistemological and decision-theory feamres of a Bayesian approach, it includes by definition a double-level probabilistic model separating epistemic and aleatory components and offers a traceable process to mix the encoding of engineering expertise inside priors and the observations inside an updated epistemic layer that proves mathematically consistent even when dealing with very low-size samples. 

Chapter 10 is devoted to medical device usability. It covers topics such as medical device users and use environments, medical device user interfaces, an approach to develop medical devices effective user interfaces, guidelines to reduce medical device user interface-related errors, guidelines for designing hand-operated devices with respect to cumulative trauma disorder, and useful documents for improving usability of medical devices. Chapter 11 presents three important topics relating to patient safety patient safety organizations, data sources, and mathematical models for performing probabilistic patient safety analysis. 

In the history of mathematics, uncertainty was approached in the XVlP century by Pascal and Fermat who introduced the notion of probability. However, probabilities do not allow one to process subjective beliefs nor imprecise or vague knowledge, such as in computer modeling of three-dimensional structure. Subjectivity and imprecision were only considered from 1965, when Zadeh, known for his work in systems theory, introduced the notion of fuzzy set. The concept of fuzziness introduces partial membership to classes, admitting intermediary situations between no and full membership. Zadeh s theory of possibility, introduced in 1977, constitutes a framework allowing for the representation of such uncertain concepts of non-probabilistic nature (9). The concept of fuzzy set allows one to consider imprecision and uncertainty in a single formalism and to quantitatively measure the preference of one hypothesis versus another. Note, however, that Bayesian probabilities could have been used instead. 

Edwards has also noted the strong mathematical analogies between the functional integral representation of the polymer excluded volume problem and questions associated with electronic structure in disordered systems. "" Thus a detailed discussion of this formal approach is of more than just academic interest. In the polymer case, approximation may be guided by probabilistic arguments, whereas in the disordered system analogous mathematical approximations rest upon less intuitive grounds. 

---