Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Primary electron beam

Figure Bl.25.6. Energy spectrum of electrons coming off a surface irradiated with a primary electron beam. Electrons have lost energy to vibrations and electronic transitions (loss electrons), to collective excitations of the electron sea (plasmons) and to all kinds of inelastic process (secondary electrons). The element-specific Auger electrons appear as small peaks on an intense background and are more visible in a derivative spectrum. Figure Bl.25.6. Energy spectrum of electrons coming off a surface irradiated with a primary electron beam. Electrons have lost energy to vibrations and electronic transitions (loss electrons), to collective excitations of the electron sea (plasmons) and to all kinds of inelastic process (secondary electrons). The element-specific Auger electrons appear as small peaks on an intense background and are more visible in a derivative spectrum.
One important sem source that is not based on thermionic emission is the field emission (fe) source. Fe-sem systems typically give images of much higher resolution than conventional sems due to the much narrower energy distribution (on the order of 0.25 eV) of the primary electron beam. A fe source is a pointed W tip from which electrons tunnel under the influence of a large electric field. This different mechanism of electron generation also results in a brightness comparable to a conventional thermionic source with much less current. [Pg.271]

Once the primary electron beam is created, it must be demagnified with condenser lenses and then focused onto the sample with objective lenses. These electron lenses are electromagnetic in nature and use electric and magnetic fields to steer the electrons. Such lenses are subject to severe spherical and chromatic aberrations. Therefore, a point primary beam source is blurred into a primary beam disk to an extent dependent on the energy and energy spread of the primary electrons. In addition, these lenses are also subject to astigmatism. AH three of these effects ultimately limit the primary beam spot size and hence, the lateral resolution achievable with sem. [Pg.271]

Instmmentation for tern is somewhat similar to that for sem however, because of the need to keep the sample surface as clean as possible throughout the analysis to avoid imaging surface contamination as opposed to the sample surface itself, ultrahigh vacuum conditions (ca 10 -10 Pa) are needed in the sample area of the microscope. Electron sources in tern are similar to those used in sem, although primary electron beam energies needed for effective tern are higher, typically on the order of ca 100 keV. [Pg.272]

The complete description of the number of Auger electrons that are detected in the energy distribution of electrons coming from a surface under bombardment by a primary electron beam contains many factors. They can be separated into contributions from four basic processes, the creation of inner shell vacancies in atoms of the sample, the emission of electrons as a result of Auger processes resulting from these inner shell vacancies, the transport of those electrons out of the sample, and the detection and measurement of the energy distribution of the electrons coming from the sample. [Pg.313]

AES analysis is done in one of four modes of analysis. The simplest, most direct, and most often used mode of operation of an Auger spectrometer is the point analysis mode, in which the primary electron beam is positioned on the area of interest on the sample and an Auger survey spectrum is taken. The next most often used mode of analysis is the depth profiling mode. The additional feature in this mode is that an ion beam is directed onto the same area that is being Auger analyzed. The ion beam sputters material off the surface so that the analysis measures the variation, in depth, of the composition of the new surfaces, which are being continu-... [Pg.321]

The results shown in Figure 6 above are an example of this mode of analysis, but include additional information on the chemical states of the Si. The third most frequently used mode of analysis is the Auger mapping mode, in which an Auger peak of a particular element is monitored while the primary electron beam is raster scanned over an area. This mode determines the spatial distribution, across the surface, of the element of interest, rather than in depth, as depth profiling does. Of course, the second and third modes can be combined to produce a three-dimensional spatial distribution of the element. The fourth operational mode is just a subset of the third mode a line scan of the primary beam is done across a region of interest, instead of rastering over an area. [Pg.322]

Figure 3 First-derivative electron emission spectra from pure lanthanum taken with primary electron beams having energies of 250 and 235 eV showing the unshifted Auger peaks and the shifted REELS peaks. Figure 3 First-derivative electron emission spectra from pure lanthanum taken with primary electron beams having energies of 250 and 235 eV showing the unshifted Auger peaks and the shifted REELS peaks.
In principle, energy-analyzer systems can be designed such that their electron-optical properties do not limit the energy resolution attainable, i. e. their intrinsic energy resolution is much better than the energy width of the primary electron beam, which is of the order of approximately 1.5-2.5 eV for a tungsten hairpin cathode, approximately 1 eV for a LaBg cathode, approximately 0.7 eV for a Schottky field emitter, and 0.3-0.5 eV for a pure cold-field emitter. [Pg.54]

Data collection is mostly performed at normal incidence of the primary electron beam. Under these conditions usually several equivalent LEED spots exist because of the surface symmetry. By taking care that the I-V curves of equivalent spots are identical, normal incidence conditions can be adjusted to within a few tenths of a degree. [Pg.81]

Electron microscopy is a rather straightforward technique to determine the size and shape of supported particles [S. Amelinckx, D. van Dyck, J. van Landuyt and G. van Tendeloo, Handbook of Microscopy (1997), VCH, Weinheim]. Electrons have characteristic wavelengths of less than 1 A, and come close to monitoring atomic detail. Figure 4.13 summarizes what happens when a primary electron beam of energy between 100 and 400 keV hits a sample ... [Pg.143]

Figure 4.13. Interaction between the primary electron beam and the sample in an electron microscope leads to a number of detectable signals. Figure 4.13. Interaction between the primary electron beam and the sample in an electron microscope leads to a number of detectable signals.
The prindple of a LEED experiment is shown schematically in Fig. 4.26. The primary electron beam impinges on a crystal with a unit cell described by vectors ai and Uj. The (00) beam is reflected direcdy back into the electron gun and can not be observed unless the crystal is tilted. The LEED image is congruent with the reciprocal lattice described by two vectors, and 02". The kinematic theory of scattering relates the redprocal lattice vectors to the real-space lattice through the following relations... [Pg.160]

Auger analysis of small features. The primary electron beam column is similar to that in electron microscopes, and it may contain both electrostatic and magnetic lenses for beam focussing as well as quadrupole deflectors for beam steering and octopole lenses for beam shaping. [Pg.170]

Figure 5.30 illustrates schematically the cross-section of a CMA, and the principle of its operation. It consists of two coaxial cylinders, with the inner cylinder at ground potential and a potential of — V on the outer. The primary electron beam hits the sample surface and some of the Auger electrons generated will pass through the grid covered annular aperture in the inner cylinder. [Pg.172]

N and 0, in solid material. The second point is that EXELFS is especially suitable for the study of inhomogeneous samples (structurally and compositionally heterogeneous in the sense discussed in section 2.2 above) because the primary electron beam can be focussed to a diameter of ca 20. Other advantages of EXELFS have been discussed elsewhere (60, 61). The limitations of the technique include (i) the need to select an optimal thickness of sample so as to minimize multiple scattering and (ii) the susceptibility of the samples to suffer radiation damage. [Pg.448]

Primary creep, 13 472 Primary electron beam, demagnification of, 24 78... [Pg.759]

Figure 26.2 N KLL peak-shape in some nitrides 8 recorded with a primary electron beam of 5 keV, 0.5 pA and peak-to-peak modulation of 3 V. Figure 26.2 N KLL peak-shape in some nitrides 8 recorded with a primary electron beam of 5 keV, 0.5 pA and peak-to-peak modulation of 3 V.

See other pages where Primary electron beam is mentioned: [Pg.270]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.252]   


SEARCH



Electron beam

Electron primary

Primary beam

© 2024 chempedia.info