Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Preservative laboratory evaluation

In this study, the use of pyrolysis oil from wood was tested as an alternative wood preservative. In the initial laboratory evaluation, the toxic effects of the oil against wood destroying basidiomycetes were determined. The fungus Lentus lepideus was included as an especially resistant organism to (ar oils. [Pg.1551]

Pyrethroids. More accurately described as the synthetic pyrethroids, this group of compounds has been used extensively in wood preservation for control of both beetles and termites. Activity, cost and performance characteristics vary depending upon the specific compound but most readily accepted for use in wood preservative formulations are permethrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, bifenthrin and cyfluthrin. In terms of activity against wood boring beetles, cyfluthrin is estimated to be 20 times more effective than permethrin, 10 times as effective as cypermethrin and twice as effective as deltamethrin when compared in laboratory evaluative procedures. However, in practice other factors need to be considered, particularly the relative vapour pressures (and therefore evaporative loss) and, in wood in soil contact, the rate of biotransformation by colonising bacteria. The pyrethroids are effective as neurotoxins, and are axonic poisons. [Pg.436]

Grace, J. K., Laks, P. E. and Yamamoto, R. T., 1992. Laboratory evaluation of chlorothalonil against the Formosan subterranean termite. International Research Group on Wood Preservation. IRG/1W92-1559. [Pg.441]

Prevention or inhibition of organic deposition is far more effective than removal. Commercially available inhibitor treatment products (wax crystal modifiers, and asphaltene dispersants or inhibitors) are available. Selection should be based on careful laboratory evaluation and testing with appropriately preserved produced crude oil samples. [Pg.197]

The success of therapy is measured by the degree to which the care plan decreases the pretreatment deterioration rate, preserves the patients functioning, and treats psychiatric and behavioral symptoms. The primary outcome measure is thus subjective information from the patient and the caregiver, although the MMSE can be a helpful tool for monitoring changes in the severity of illness. There are no physical examination or laboratory parameters that are used to evaluate the success of therapy. [Pg.522]

The other primary component of the study was the development of laboratory performance measures, focusing on three primary factors quality, quantity and response time. The most sensitive performance measure was quality, which refers primarily to analytical controls built into a laboratory operation and provisions for preserving the integrity of the evidence and reports. A "performance index" was developed which should enable any laboratory to undertake its own evaluation and to predict the impact of proposed improvements to the laboratory prior to their actual implementation. [Pg.47]

Small quantities of A-nitrosoamines have been shown to cause cancer in laboratory animals. These findings have generated concern about the common practice of using sodium nitrite to preserve meats such as bacon, ham, and hot dogs. When the meat is eaten, sodium nitrite combines with stomach acid to form nitrous acid, which can convert amines in the food to A-nitrosoamines. Because nitrites are naturally present in many other foods, it is unclear just how much additional risk is involved in using sodium nitrite to preserve meats. More research is being done in this area to evaluate the risk. [Pg.911]

To illustrate the WoE approach we will apply it to the evaluation of toxicity as a cause or risk factor in the alteration of benthic community structure in a waterway (Figure 12.11). Extensive data on chemical concentrations in sediments are obtained at the site under investigation (A). Data on the chemical contaminants are matched with laboratory tests of sediment toxicity to the chemicals (B). A comparison of the chemical concentrations to the toxicity data indicates that the materials are toxic under laboratory conditions (C). A hypothesis is then generated that identifies the sediment under consideration as likely to be toxic. Sediment bioassays of the sediment can confirm the hypothesis (D). Since the assessment endpoint is the preservation of benthos, measurements are made of the benthic community structure in the region (E). Chemical concentrations and toxicity results are also compared to measures of benthic community structure. Chemicals that are positively associated... [Pg.389]

Some of the above methods can be miniaturized, and the instrumentation can be adapted for use in field situations (see Section 4 of this book (Potential Use of Screening Methods and Performance Evaluation)), and some can be used only in the laboratory. In the former case a spot sample can be taken, processed and analysed in the field without the need for sample preservation, transport, or storage. Since many of these methods are rapid, they can provide either quantitative (concentration) or qualitative (above or below a threshold) data on water quality in a time-scale that enables a timely and appropriate response (for instance in the case of an accidental spillage) or the rapid mapping of water quality in a wide area. Table 1.3.3 shows the main classes of chemical priority substances and the different methods that can be used for their analysis. [Pg.46]

This part of the laboratory performance study is probably the most sensitive to the participants. The responsible of the evaluation may have to draw consequences from the achieved performance for the various participants. To assume this responsibility he needs to be scientifically competent. The organiser should also ensure that the data have been produced without any collusion of participants or falsification. Depending on the number of participants, the objective and the consequences of the study and the frequency of the trials, preservative measures against collusion may be taken (e.g. different and coded sets of test samples, etc). Whatever, it must remain clear to the participants that laboratory performance studies are first of all organised to help them to reach and maintain quality for the benefit of ail. [Pg.500]

Notwithstanding the complexities considered above, chemical processes must be developed in a way which people, the environment and property are protected. The chemical reaction process itself presents its own peculiar evaluation needs which impact upon occupational safety and health, environmental protection and property preservation and conservation. In the progression of a process from the research laboratory to the development laboratory to the pilot plant and eventually to manufacturing, the objectives for the process review must be ... [Pg.9]

Sodium azide is a highly toxic, white crystalline solid. It has come into widespread use in automobile airbags its explosive decomposition to nitrogen gas provides rapid inflation of the airbag. In addition, sodium azide is used in the production of metallic azide explosives and as a preservative in laboratories. It has no current medical uses, but because of its potent vasodilatory effects, it has been evaluated as an antihypertensive agent,... [Pg.122]


See other pages where Preservative laboratory evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.201]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.776]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.876]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.203]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.196 ]




SEARCH



Laboratory evaluation

© 2024 chempedia.info