Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Preparative basic chromatograph

Probably the most common distillation method used as a form of sample preparation for chromatographic analysis is steam distillation [31,32]. Solvent extraction and gas phase stripping methods are generally inefficient procedures for isolating polar, acidic, or basic compounds in an aqueous matrix due to the low efficiency of water immiscible solvents for the extraction of these compounds and their low volatility and high water affinity which results in a very slow transfer to the gas phase using... [Pg.886]

Preparative LC is similar to analytical LC in that the same basic chromatographic relationships between V0, k, a, R, and N still apply, but each... [Pg.415]

A solution of potassium naphthalenide is prepared from 2.0 g (50 mmol) of potassium and 6.4 g (50 mmol) of naphthalene in 40 mL ofTHF. After 1 h at r.t. this mixture is diluted with 10 mL of diethyl ether and 10 mL of petroleum ether (bp 40-60 °C) and cooled to — 120 °C. 4.5 g (25 mmol) of ( )-l-methoxy-3-phenylthio-1-propcne arc added followed by 3.36 g (25 mmol) of chlorobis(l-dimethylamino)borane. This mixture is allowed to warm to r.t. over 3 h the solvents are removed in vacuo and the residue is carefully distilled through a 5-cm column at 10 2 Torr. The distillate, containing also naphthalene, is dissolved in 30 mL of diethyl ether and treated with 2.95 g (25 mmol) of pinacol for 3 h. The crude product is chromatographed over 30 g of basic alumina (activity 1) using petroleum ether (bp 40 -60°C) giving 9.2 g of a mixture of product and naphthalene the yield of product (89% E) is determined to be 60% by H-NMR analysis. Similarly prepared is ... [Pg.268]

The sample preparation in LC analysis is as important as the chromatographic separation itself. The procedure will often require considerable skill copied with a basic understanding of chromatographic methodology. The analyst will need to have some familiarity with micro techniques including general micro-manipulation, microfiltration, centrifugation and derivatization. [Pg.195]

The main characteristics of the ideal extraction method are given in Table 3.47, which at the same time are also criteria for comparison of sample preparation techniques. It is unlikely that a unique best method can be defined, which is analyte and matrix independent. Extraction is affected by polymer functionality, molecular weight and cross-linking. Selective extraction of some additives is basically not possible. Hence, the goal of an ideal extraction would be the complete extraction of all additives from the polymer for subsequent chromatographic separation. [Pg.134]

Principles and Characteristics Although early published methods using SPE for sample preparation avoided use of GC because of the reported lack of cleanliness of the extraction device, SPE-GC is now a mature technique. Off-line SPE-GC is well documented [62,63] but less attractive, mainly in terms of analyte detectability (only an aliquot of the extract is injected into the chromatograph), precision, miniaturisation and automation, and solvent consumption. The interface of SPE with GC consists of a transfer capillary introduced into a retention gap via an on-column injector. Automated SPE may be interfaced to GC-MS using a PTV injector for large-volume injection [64]. LVI actually is the basic and critical step in any SPE-to-GC transfer of analytes. Suitable solvents for LVI-GC include pentane, hexane, methyl- and ethylacetate, and diethyl or methyl-f-butyl ether. Large-volume PTV permits injection of some 100 iL of sample extract, a 100-fold increase compared to conventional GC injection. Consequently, detection limits can be improved by a factor of 100, without... [Pg.436]

B. 2,2-(Trimethylenedithio)cyclohexanone. A solution of 3.02 g. (0.02 mole) of freshly distilled 1-pyrrolidinocyclohexene, 8.32 g. (0.02 mole) of trimethylene dithiotosylate4 (Note 2), and 5 ml. of triethylamine (Note 3) in 40 ml. of anhydrous acetonitrile (Note 4), is refluxed for 12 hours in a 100-ml., round-bottom flask under a nitrogen atmosphere. The solvent is removed under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator, and the residue is treated with 100 ml. of aqueous 0.1 N hydrochloric acid for 30 minutes at 50° (Note 5). The mixture is cooled to ambient temperature and extracted with three 50-ml. portions of ether. The combined ether extracts are washed with aqueous 10% potassium bicarbonate solution (Note 6) until the aqueous layer remains basic to litmus, and then with saturated sodium chloride solution. The ethereal solution is dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated on a rotary evaporator. The resulting oily residue is diluted with 1 ml. of benzene and then with 3 ml. of cyclohexane. The solution is poured into a chromatographic column (13 x 2.5 cm.), prepared with 50 g. of alumina (Note 7) and a 3 1 mixture of cyclohexane and benzene. With this solvent system, the desired product moves with the solvent front, and the first 250 ml. of eluent contains 95% of the total product. Elution with a further 175 ml. of solvent removes the remainder. The combined fractions are evaporated, and the pale yellow, oily residue crystallizes readily on standing. Recrystallization of this material from pentane gives 1.82 g. of white crystalline 2,2-(trimethylenedithio)cyclo-hexanone, m.p. 52-55° (45% yield) (Note 8). [Pg.20]

The basic studies dealing with the preparation of continuous porous silica materials date back to 1991 [76-78]. Two years later, Nakanishi and Saga applied for a patent describing the fabrication of monolithic silica rods for chromatographic application [79-81], whereas a second protocol for the preparation of continuous silica rods was independently filed by Merck KGaA in Germany [82]. [Pg.13]

The form of the isotherm need not be Langmuir in nature, but in any event, must be experimentally determined in order to identify the true profile of the overloaded peak. In practice, the determination of the adsorption isotherm of each compound to be separated by a preparative chromatographic procedure can be arduous and time consuming. A better alternative might be to design the fully optimized column from basic principles in the manner previously described. [Pg.262]


See other pages where Preparative basic chromatograph is mentioned: [Pg.166]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.776]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.717]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.40]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.172 ]




SEARCH



Chromatographic preparation

© 2024 chempedia.info