Preference functions testing procedure

Top-Feed Test Procedure The sequence of operations with a top-feed leaf test is the same as in a bottom-feed test, except that the leaf is not immersed in the slurry. The best method for transferring the slurry to the top-feed leaf is, of course, a function of the characteristics of the slurry. If the particles in the slurry do not settle rapidly, the feed can usually be transferred to the leaf from a beaker. If, however, the particles settle very rapidly, it is virtually impossible to pour the slurry out of a beaker satisfactorily. In this case, the best method is to make use of an Erlenmeyer flask, preferably one made of plastic. The slurry is swirled in the flask until it is completely suspended and then abruptly inverted over the leaf. This technique will ensure that all of the sohds are transferred to the leaf. 

The extraction of preference functions, as the training procedure, is not a very powerful training procedure and it is not expected to lead to overtraining. We shall test this assumption by performing still another two-times cross-validation test in which 168 membrane proteins are divided into 63 proteins used by Rost et al. [9] and 105 proteins used by us. Table 9 lists performance results for different combinations of training and testing procedures... 

The prediction by preference functions method achieved in the testing procedure. 

It is good practice to check carefully the electrochemical potential of the embeddable reference electrode against an accurate reference (SCE or Ag/AgCl), preferably in a laboratory, before the electrode is embedded in concrete. Normally, a saturated Ca(OH)2 solution is used as a test solution. By prolonging the exposure time in the solution, the magnitude of shortterm potential drift can be detected (be aware of temperature dependence). Potential values should always be compared with data provided by the supplier of the reference electrode. It is recommended that the functional and/or calibration check procedures given by the supplier are followed. 

Preferably, tests and the documentation of results should be done automatically, always using the same set of test files. In this way, users are encouraged to perform the tests more frequently, and user specific errors are eliminated. In some cases, vendors provide test files and automated test routines for verification of a computer system s performance in the user s laboratory. Needless to say, the correct functioning of this software should also be verified. If such software is not available, the execution of the tests and the verification of actual results with prerecorded results can be done manually. Successful execution of such a procedure ensures that ... 

Vacuum and pressure laboratory filtration assemblies are shown in Figure 11.7. Mild agitation with air sometimes may be preferable to the mechanical stirrer shown, but it is important that any agglomerates of particles be kept merely in suspension and not broken up. The test record sheet of Figure 11.8 shows the kind of data that normally are of interest. Besides measurements of filtrate and cake amounts as functions of time and pressure, it is desirable to test washing rates and efficiencies and rates of moisture removal with air blowing. Typical data of these kinds are shown in Figure 11.3. Detailed laboratory procedures are explained by Bosley (1977) and Dahlstrom and Silverblatt (1977). Test and scale-up procedures for all kinds of SLS equipment are treated in the book edited by Purchas (1977). 

Cross-validation is used to estimate the generalization error of a model or to compare the performance of different models. K-fold cross-validation divides a data set into k different subsets of equal size n. The validation procedure includes k runs and applies a round-robin approach. During each run one of the k subsets is left out and used as the test set while the remaining subsets are used for training the model. Leave-one-out cross-validation is present if k equals the sample size (i.e., each subset includes only one case). The selection between leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-vahdation depends on the situation. The former is preferred for continuous error functions, whereas the latter is preferred for determining the number of misclassified cases. A frequent value for k-fold cross-validation is k = 10. 

Whenever possible, the in vitro test system should be obtained from certified sources, and appropriate procedures should be applied to minimize the risk of contamination and cross-contamination during their storage and use in the laboratory. Preferably, all in vitro test system characteristics (i.e., post-thaw functionality, expected recovery, doubling time, etc.) and sterility should be documented by the cell supplier in the form of certificate of analysis. 

Since relative humidity plays such a key role in the corrosiveness of many environments, it is always desirable to monitor the interrelated humidity factors temperature, humidity, and dewpoint temperature. Since reliable commercial equipment is widely available, it will not be discussed further. Closely related to dewpoint is time-of-wetness (TOW), which is measured by monitoring the resistance between oppositely biased electrical conductors as a function of relative humidity. Bias can be applied through an external power source [72]. Alternatively, adjacent metal conductors can be selected to have substantially different corrosion potentials [73]. Above a critical level of relative hiunidity, the test specimen will adsorb a sufficient amoimt of moisture to produce a sharply lower resistance between conductors. The fraction of time of lowered resistance is commonly referred to as the time-of-wetness. It is one useful measure of the corrosivity of an environment. Such measurements were popular in the 1960s and 1970s. More recently, the preferred measurement, due to ease of use, is fraction of time the dewpoint is reached. A procedure for measuring time-of-wetness is contained in ASTM G 84, Standard Practice for Measurement of Time-of-Wetness on Surfaces Exposed to Wetting Conditions as in Atmospheric Corrosion Testing. 

---