Structure prediction techniques

Lead optimization Application of early ADMET predictive techniques, structure-activity relationships and medicinal chemistry testing of homologs... 

In the area of predictive toxicology the applicability domain is taken to express the scope and limitations of a model, that is, the range of chemical structures for which the model is considered to be applicable [106]. Although this issue has been fundamental to the use of QSAR (and indeed any predictive technique) since its conception, there remain few reliable methods to define and apply an applicability domain in predictive toxicology. The current status of methods to define the applicability domain for use in (Q)SAR has been assessed recently by Netzeva et al. [106]. 

The most serious problem with MM as a method to predict molecular structure is convergence to a false, rather than the global minimum in the Born-Oppenheimer surface. The mathematical problem is essentially still unsolved, but several conformational searching methods for approaching the global minimum, and based on either systematic or random searches have been developed. These searches work well for small to medium-sized molecules. The most popular of these techniques that simulates excitation to surmount potential barriers, has become known as Molecular Dynamics [112]. 

In the investigations of molecular adsorption reported here our philosophy has been to first determine the orientation of the adsorbed molecule or molecular fragment using NEXAFS and/or photoelectron diffraction. Using photoemission selection rules we then assign the observed spectral features in the photoelectron spectrum. On the basis of Koopmans theorem a comparison with a quantum chemical cluster calculation is then possible, should this be available. All three types of measurement can be performed with the same angle-resolving photoelectron spectrometer, but on different monochromators. In the next Section we briefly discuss the techniques. The third Section is devoted to three examples of the combined application of NEXAFS and photoemission, whereby the first - C0/Ni(100) - is chosen mainly for didactic reasons. The results for the systems CN/Pd(111) and HCOO/Cu(110) show, however, the power of this approach in situations where no a priori predictions of structure are possible. 

Cutting across the domains of the various techniques mentioned above, are the model calculations l These are theoretical attempts to predict the structure of surfaces from first principles. The model calculations differ from the theories mentioned in conjunction with the experimental techniques listed above, in that the former are not primarily designed to describe the interaction of a probe with a surface, although obviously much overlap exists. Thus the calculation of electronic states at surfaces seeks to describe from first principles a situation (the structure of the surface) that is analyzed experimentally by any of the techniques mentioned above, using external probes but some of these techniques also involve the motion of electrons througli the surface region this motion in turn is clearly related to the electronic structure of the surface, and so the first-principles calculation and the surface-analysis technique may have and often do have much in common. 

In the absence of crystallographic or NMR data, predictive techniques based on protein primary sequences can be used to elaborate crude 3D models. Such models will suggest that certain amino acid residues are involved in forming the active (receptor) site. The assignment of structural or functional roles to particular residues can be tested by site-directed mutagenesis, and the model can be further refined by consideration of SAR among ligands. 

Homology modelling is not an exact technique. Especially, when the extent of sequence homology (exact matches and matches between amino acid residues of similar property, e.g. hydrophobic, polar, acidic, basic) is low, then more attention will be paid to structural rather than sequence similarities and to prediction of structure for unmatched sequences. In such cases, and always when there is no crystal structure of a member of the family to provide a template, then total reliance has to be placed on the experience of the investigator or in one of the many computer programs now available. The principal methods have been reviewed by Sternberg (1986) and Blundell et al. (1987a). 

Katz s two predictive techniques provided industry with acceptable predictions of mixture hydrate formation conditions, without the need for costly measurements. Subsequently, hydrate research centered on the determination of the hydrate crystal structure(s). Further refinements of the Kvsi values were determined by Katz and coworkers (especially Kobayashi) in Chapter 5 of the Handbook of Natural Gas Engineering (1959), by Robinson and coworkers (Jhaveri and Robinson, 1965 Robinson andNg, 1976), and by Poettmann (1984). 

Because the two prediction techniques of this chapter were determined over half a century ago, they apply only to si and sH hydrates, without consideration of the more recent sH, which always contains a heavier component. For structure H equilibrium, only the statistical thermodynamics method of Chapter 5 is available for prediction of hydrate pressure, temperature, and composition. 

Subject areas for the Series include solutions of electrolytes, liquid mixtures, chemical equilibria in solution, acid-base equilibria, vapour-liquid equilibria, liquid-liquid equilibria, solid-liquid equilibria, equilibria in analytical chemistry, dissolution of gases in liquids, dissolution and precipitation, solubility in cryogenic solvents, molten salt systems, solubility measurement techniques, solid solutions, reactions within the solid phase, ion transport reactions away from the interface (i.e. in homogeneous, bulk systems), liquid crystalline systems, solutions of macrocyclic compounds (including macrocyclic electrolytes), polymer systems, molecular dynamic simulations, structural chemistry of liquids and solutions, predictive techniques for properties of solutions, complex and multi-component solutions applications, of solution chemistry to materials and metallurgy (oxide solutions, alloys, mattes etc.), medical aspects of solubility, and environmental issues involving solution phenomena and homogeneous component phenomena. 

While the primary structure of proteins and nucleic acids can be experimentally determined in a straight-forward manner, their higher-order structures are much more difficult to elucidate. In general, computational methods dealing with primary structure focus on interpretation of the structure-function, as in promoter analysis. By contrast computational methods working on higher-order structure instead focus on the prediction of structural details. Further, most techniques are limited to the prediction of RNA and protein structures—sugar-, fatty-add-, and DNA-structural prediction methods are in their infancy. 

There are several areas where further research is needed to better define the atmospheric degradation mechanisms and hence environmental impact of anthropogenic compounds. In general, there is a fairly complete database concerning the kinetics of the reactions which initiate the oxidation of pollutants. Extensive databases, structure activity relationships, and predictive techniques are available for the reaction of most anthropogenic molecules with OH and NO3 radicals and O3. When kinetic data are available for other members of the class, the predictive techniques generally provide reliable (within a factor of 2) estimates of kinetic data for new compounds. However, when the compound is a member of a class of compounds for which no kinetic data exist, the predictive techniques provide estimates which are less reliable (uncertain by typically a factor of 5). Our understanding of the subsequent reaction mechanisms and the identity of the oxidation products is... 

---