Polymer-based practical cells

The LPB negative is commonly a lithium metal foil. The positive is based on a reversible intercalation compound, generally of the same type as those 

Type Company Cell structure Cathode Anode Electrolyte 

Long-life Mitsubishi Electric Folding type LiC Oo. 3Nio, 7O 2 Graphitized carbon LiC104/EC+DME 

EC = ethylene carbonate DME = dimethoxyelhane DMC = dimethyl carbon ate DEC = diethylcarbonate. Derived from LIBES (Lithium Battery Energy Storage Technology Research Association) released information. 

A key advantage of the LPB concept is related to its all-solid-state construction. This facilitates the production of rugged (i.e. tolerant to shock, vibration and mechanical deformation), leak-proof, gassing-free and non-fixed geometry cells. Also, the absence of free liquids allows LPBs to be packaged in lightweight plastic containers, unlike conventional lithium batteries which require metallic casing. This simple but effective cell encapsulation is illustrated in Fig. 7.37 for a prototype cell. 

---

Fuel cell-based power plants that have an output of up to 10 kW are under vigorous development as well, and they find ever wider practical uses. Table 24.3 shows the number of such plants produced every year from 2001 to 2010. Approximately half of the units produced in 2006 had a power of about 1 kW, and the other half had an output of 1.5-10 kW, the numbers being distributed evenly over this time interval. The overwhelming number (more than 50%) of these plants were produced and set up in Japan, with the United States taking the second place. Most of the low-power units were built with polymer electrolyte fuel cells. The fraction of solid oxide fuel cells has decreased gradually. 

From the cost point of view, precious metals (such as Au and Pt) are surely out of contention for practical coatings on SS substrates, although they might be used for short laboratory tests. In fact, electrochemical corrosion cells will be generated from the possible pinholes in the coatings due to the electrochemical dissimilarity of the precious metals and SSs in a PEMFC environment. Difficulties encountered with the carbon-based and conductive polymer-based coatings are application at intermediate temperatures, the cold-start issue, and the differences in thermal expansion coefficients between the coating itself and the substrate SS. The risk of... 

Over the last decade, several new proton exchange membranes have been developed. The new polymers in fuel cell applications are based mostly on hydrocarbon structures for the polymer backbone. Poly(styrene sulfonic acid) is a basic material in this field. In practice, poly(styrene sulfonic acid) and the analogous polymers such as phenol sulfonic acid resin and poly(trifluorostyrene sulfonic acid), were frequently used as polymer electrolytes for PEMFCs in the 1960s. Chemically and thermally stable aromatic polymers such as poly(styrene) [ 3 ], poly(oxy-1,4-phenyleneoxy-1,4-phenylenecarbony 1-1,4-phenylene) (PEEK) [4], poly(phenylenesulfide) [5], poly(l,4-phenylene) [6, 7], poly (oxy-1,4-phe-nylene) [8], and other aromatic polymers [9-11], can be employed as the polymer backbone for proton conducting polymers. These chemical structures are illustrated in Fig. 6.2. 

An interesting and practically valuable result was obtained in [21] for PE + N2 melts, and in [43] for PS + N2 melts. The authors classified upper critical volumetric flow rate and pressure with reference to channel dimensions x Pfrerim y Qf"im-Depending on volume gas content

channel entrance (pressure of 1 stm., experimental temperature), x and y fall, in accordance with Eq. (24), to tp 0.85. At cp 0.80, in a very narrow interval of gas concentrations, x and y fall by several orders. The area of bubble flow is removed entirely. It appears that at this concentration of free gas, a phase reversal takes place as the polymer melt ceases to be a continuous phase (fails to form a continuous cluster , in flow theory terminology). The theoretical value of the critical concentration at which the continuous cluster is formed equals 16 vol. % (cf., for instance, Table 9.1 in [79] and [80]). An important practical conclusion ensues it is impossible to obtain extrudate with over 80 % of cells without special techniques. In other words, technology should be based on a volume con-... 

These three approaches to reject heat and exhaust fuel recovery with power generation apply primarily to the higher temperature, solid oxide (1800 F) and molten carbonate (1200 F), fuel cell systems operating on CH4 fuel. The lower operating temperatures of the phosphoric acid (400 F) and polymer electrolyte (175 F) fuel cells severely limit the effectiveness of thermal cycle based power generation as a practical means of heat recovery. 

Gel polymer lithium-ion batteries replace the conventional liquid electrolytes with an advanced polymer electrolyte membrane. These cells can be packed in lightweight plastic packages as they do not have any free electrolytes and they can be fabricated in any desired shape and size. They are now increasingly becoming an alternative to liquid-electrolyte lithium-ion batteries, and several battery manufacturers. such as Sanyo. Sony, and Panasonic have started commercial production.Song et al. have recently reviewed the present state of gel-type polymer electrolyte technology for lithium-ion batteries. They focused on four plasticized systems, which have received particular attention from a practical viewpoint, i.e.. poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). poly (acrylonitrile) (PAN). ° poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). - and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVdF) based electrolytes. ... 

---