Polyethylene adhesion, surface

Li JX, Wang J, Shen LR et al (2007) The influence of polyethylene terephthalate surfaces modified by silver ion implantation on bacterial adhesion behavior. Surf Coat Technol 201 8155-8159... 

Figure 4. Polyethylene adhesion of machine made papers at different critical surface tension levels. (Reproduced, with permission, from Ref. 4. Copyright 1966,...

In addition to the two fluorocarbon surfaces, it is informative to consider data for two hydrocarbon solid surfaces paraffin and polyethylene. Adhesion tension data for these surfaces have been presented by Fox and Zisman [35]. Selections of these data are given also in Table I, as are some additional data of Bascom and Singleterry for polyethylene [10]. 

For bonding two smooth glass surfaces, one might select a hot-melt polyethylene adhesive, an aqueous acrylic latex adhesive, or two-... 

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) parts are generally joined by adhesives. Surface treatments recommended specifically for PBT include abrasion and solvent cleaning with toluene. Gas plasma surface treatments and chemical etch have been used where maximum strength is necessary. Solvent cleaning of PET surfaces is recommended. The linear film of polyethylene terephthalate (Mylar ) surface can be pretreated by alkeiline etching or plasma for msiximum adhesion, but often a special treatment is unnecessary. Commonly used adhesives for both PBT and PET substrates are isocyanate-cured polyesters, epoxies, and urethanes. Polyethylene terephthalate cannot be solvent cemented or heat welded. 

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is another well-known molecule used to reduce protein adsorption and/or platelet adhesion. Surface enrichment of a triblock oligomeric PEG containing additive from a polyurethane matrix was reported [54,55]. The authors used PEG as the active groups to suppress protein and platelet adhesion. The authors first synthesized a methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)-poly (tetramethylene oxide) (PTMO) 1000 prepolymer with a MW of approximately 4750 (PU4750), and then this prepolymer was terminally functionalized with mono amino-polyethylene oxide (PEG) with different MW (PEO550, 2000, or 5000, Table 2.3). This triblock copolymer was mixed with a polyurethane (MDI/ PTMO 1000/ethylene diamine (ED)) at different ratios in dimethylformamide (DMF) and cast into polymer films. The surface compositions of these films were evaluated by XPS. 

Devine, A. T., and M. J. Bodnar, Effects of Various Surface Treatments on Adhesive Bonding of Polyethylene, Adhesives Age, May 1969. 

From Tables 2 and 3, an epoxide adhesive (surface tension 45 dynes/cm) would not be expected to wet and effectively bond a low energy surface such as polyethylene (critical surface tension 31 dynes/cm). When the polyethylene surface was etched for increasing times in a sulfuric acid-dichromate solution, bond strengths markedly increased and the surface s contact angle with water (increasing polarity) similarly decreased (Fig. 4). ... 

Acryhc stmctural adhesives have been modified by elastomers in order to obtain a phase-separated, toughened system. A significant contribution in this technology has been made in which acryhc adhesives were modified by the addition of chlorosulfonated polyethylene to obtain a phase-separated stmctural adhesive (11). Such adhesives also contain methyl methacrylate, glacial methacrylic acid, and cross-linkers such as ethylene glycol dimethacrylate [97-90-5]. The polymerization initiation system, which includes cumene hydroperoxide, N,1S7-dimethyl- -toluidine, and saccharin, can be apphed to the adherend surface as a primer, or it can be formulated as the second part of a two-part adhesive. Modification of cyanoacrylates using elastomers has also been attempted copolymers of acrylonitrile, butadiene, and styrene ethylene copolymers with methylacrylate or copolymers of methacrylates with butadiene and styrene have been used. However, because of the extreme reactivity of the monomer, modification of cyanoacrylate adhesives is very difficult and material purity is essential in order to be able to modify the cyanoacrylate without causing premature reaction. 

An important newer use of fluorine is in the preparation of a polymer surface for adhesives (qv) or coatings (qv). In this apphcation the surfaces of a variety of polymers, eg, EPDM mbber, polyethylene—vinyl acetate foams, and mbber tine scrap, that are difficult or impossible to prepare by other methods are easily and quickly treated. Fluorine surface preparation, unlike wet-chemical surface treatment, does not generate large amounts of hazardous wastes and has been demonstrated to be much more effective than plasma or corona surface treatments. Figure 5 details the commercially available equipment for surface treating plastic components. Equipment to continuously treat fabrics, films, sheet foams, and other web materials is also available. 

Attempts have been made to use cold-set adhesives in the cormgating operation, such as poly(vinyl acetate) and modified, precooked starch formulations, but these have not achieved any appreciable degree of commercial acceptance (20). The use of a polyethylene film appHed to the inside surface of the linerboard facing, which serves as a hot-melt cormgator adhesive, has achieved some commercial usage. However, its use is limited to the small, specialty product niche of fast-food hamburger cartons (see Olefin polymers, polyethylene). 

Fig. 22. Nomialized pull-off energy measured for polyethylene-polyethylene contact measured using the SFA. (a) P versus rate of crack propagation for PE-PE contact. Change in the rate of separation does not seem to affect the measured pull-off force, (b) Normalized pull-off energy, Pn as a function of contact time for PE-PE contact. At shorter contact times, P does not significantly depend on contact time. However, as the surfaces remain in contact for long times, the pull-off energy increases with time. In seinicrystalline PE, the crystalline domains act as physical crosslinks for the relatively mobile amorphous domains. These amorphous domains can interdiffuse across the interface and thereby increase the adhesion of the interface. This time dependence of the adhesion strength is different from viscoelastic behavior in the sense that it is independent of rate of crack propagation.

Friedrich et al. also used XPS to investigate the mechanisms responsible for adhesion between evaporated metal films and polymer substrates [28]. They suggested that the products formed at the metal/polymer interface were determined by redox reactions occurring between the metal and polymer. In particular, it was shown that carbonyl groups in polymers could react with chromium. Thus, a layer of chromium that was 0.4 nm in thickness decreased the carbonyl content on the surface of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) by about 8% but decreased the carbonyl content on the surface of polycarbonate (PC) by 77%. The C(ls) and 0(ls) spectra of PC before and after evaporation of chromium onto the surface are shown in Fig. 22. Before evaporation of chromium, the C(ls) spectra consisted of two components near 284.6 eV that were assigned to carbon atoms in the benzene rings and in the methyl groups. Two additional... 

---