Poisson distribution variance

Fano factor The observed variance relative to the calculated Poisson distribution variance, as observed in the peak width in spectral analysis. 

Here, f(x) is tlie probability of x occurrences of an event tliat occurs on the average p times per unit of space or time. Both tlie mean and tlie variance of a random variable X liaving a Poisson distribution are (i. 

A simple way to calculate the variance of the Poisson distribution is to first calculate < % and then apply Eq. (3-58)... 

Both the mean and variance of the Poisson distribution are equal to the parameter A. 

Variance, 269 of a distribution, 120 significance of, 123 of a Poisson distribution, 122 Variational equations of dynamical systems, 344 of singular points, 344 of systems with n variables, 345 Vector norm, 53 Vector operators, 394 Vector relations in particle collisions, 8 Vectors, characteristic, 67 Vertex, degree of, 258 Vertex, isolated, 256 Vidale, M. L., 265 Villars, P.,488 Von Neumann, J., 424 Von Neumann projection operators, 461... 

Poisson-distributed noise, however, has an interesting characteristic for Poisson-distributed noise, the expected standard deviation of the data is equal to the square root of the expected mean of the data ([11], p. 714), and therefore the variance of the data is equal (and note, that is equal, not merely proportional) to the mean of the data. Therefore we can replace Var(A s) with Es in equation 47-17 and Var(A r) with Et ... 

Lambda (A), however, is not restricted to integer values. Since A represents the mean value of the data, and in fact is equal to both the mean and the variance of the distribution, there is no reason this mean value has to be restricted to integer values, even though the data itself is. We have already used this property of the Poisson distribution in plotting the curves in Figure 49-20b. 

Previously, in the case of constant detector noise, we then set Var(A s) and Var(A r) equal to the same value. This is the point at which must we now depart from the previous derivation, since in the case of Poisson-distributed noise the sample and reference noise levels will rarely, if ever, be the same. However, we are fortunate in this case that Poisson-distributed noise has a unique and very useful property that we have indeed previously made use of the variance of Poisson-distributed noise is equal to the mean signal value. Hence we can substitute Es for Var(A s) and Er for Var(A r) ... 

In the derivation of the transmittance noise in the case of Poisson-distributed noise, at this point we noted that the variances of Er and Es were proportional to Er and Es respectively. In the current case, the corresponding relationship is that the standard... 

This result is obtained from the binomial distribution if we let p approach 0 and n approach infinity. In this case, the mean fx = p approaches a finite value. The variance of a Poisson distribution is given as cr = fx. 

In the Licari and Bailey Model [102] and also in the latest Hu and Bentley Model [105] it is proposed that the infection process be described by the Poisson distribution with mean and variance equal to a.MOI. The a-value has been proposed to be dependent on the physical system and a value of a = 0.04 was proposed for static systems [102]. For agitated systems suspension cultures Hu and Bentley proposed a value of a = 0.08 because they state that agitation systems enable higher efficiency of contact between viruses and cells [105]. This is not absolutely true, at least the true reason is not the higher mixing level but the fact that in static cultures, less cell surface is exposed to the virus, since to the cells are attached to a surface. This gives an overall constant of attachment 3-4 fold lower than in suspension systems [61]. 

Dee and Shuler [106] applied the same Poisson distribution but with a mean and variance equal to ... 

The application of mathematical modelling to baculovirus infection and virus-like particle production was also successfully done to Parvovirus B19 viruslike particle production with two different baculovirus at low MOTs [18]. But in this model the same concepts proposed in the Licari and Bailey Model was applied, i. e. baculovirus infection follows Poisson distribution with mean and variance equal to a.MOI, but with co-infection with two single-vectors, each one encoding a specific viral protein. 

Lower counting thresholds for the greatest dilution plating in series must be justified. Numbers of colonies on a plate follow the Poisson distribution, so the variance of the mean value equals the mean value of counts. Therefore, as the mean number of cfu per plate becomes lower, the percentage error of the estimate increases (Table 2). Three cfu per plate at the 10 dilution provide an estimate of 30 cfu per ml, with an error of 58% of the estimate. 

Therefore, the maximum likelihood estimator is 1/y and its asymptotic variance is Q2/n. Since we found fly) by factoringy(x,y) into fly)flx y) (apparently, given our result), the answer follows immediately. Just divide the expression used in part e. by fly). This is a Poisson distribution with parameter (3y. The log-likelihood function and its fust derivative are... 

Thus the variance is always greater than that of the pure Poisson distribution with the same average. Also express the probability generating function of pn in the characteristic function of 0(a) and conclude that the moments of a are equal to the factorial moments of n compare (1.2.15). 

Determine the probability distribution of in equilibrium, including its normalizing constant. Also find the variance and show that it does not agree with a Poisson distribution. 

The first line shows that the fluctuations of X are the same as in the reaction (1.1), compare (1.13). This could have been predicted, because as far as X is concerned the present reaction scheme is the same. The third line shows that there is a negative correlation between X and Y, an obvious consequence of the fact that each time when two atoms X associate, nx decreases and nY increases. Finally (5.13b) shows that the variance of nY is intermediate between the value belonging to a Poisson distribution and the value belonging to nx. 

Thus, we have a simplified distribution characterized by one parameter, xm compared to two parameters in the binomial distribution. The Poisson distribution is an asymmetric distribution as shown in Figure 18.24. Besides being a more tractable function to use, the Poisson distribution has certain important properties that we will use in analyzing radioactivity data. Let us consider a parameter, the variance, cr2, which expresses something about the width of the distribution of values about the mean, xm. For a set of N measurements, we can calculate cr2 as ... 

Photomultipliers, charge coupled devices (CCDs) and avalanche diode detectors are able to detect single photons over the visible to near-IR range with efficiencies approaching unity. The arrival of photons at a detector is not correlated, due to the quantum nature of electromagnetic radiation. Measurements of intensity as the averaged sum of photon events has a well-defined stochastic variance associated with a Poisson distribution. This variance scales as the square root of the number of photons. 

It should be noted that this Poisson distribution is still a discrete distribution. In radioactive decay, each atom can assume only one of two states disintegrated or intact. It is the fact that there is such a large number of atoms that decay follows the Poisson distribution, as a limiting case of the binomial distribution. The variance of the Poisson distribution (o2) is equal to the mean. That equality is the basis for the feet that the accuracy of radioactive measurements (or indeed any similar observation following a Poisson distribution) is proportional to the square root of the number of observations. 

In the Poisson and binomial distributions, the mean and variance are not independent quantities, and in the Poisson distribution they are equal. This is not an appropriate description of most measurements or observations, where the variance depends on the type of experiment. For example, a series of repeated weighings of an object will give an average value, but the spread of the observed values will depend on the quality and precision of the balance used. In other words, the mean and variance are independent quantities, and different two parameter statistical distribution functions are needed to describe these situations. The most celebrated such function is the Gaussian, or normal, distribution ... 

This is a continuous function for the experimental variables, which is used as a convenient mathematical idealisation to describe the distribution of finite numbers of results. The factor 1 /(ay/lji) is a constant such that the total area under the probability distribution curve is unity. The mean value is given by p and the variance by a2. The variance in the Gaussian distribution corresponds to the standard deviation s in Eqn. 8.3. Figure 8-3 illustrates the Gaussian distribution calculated with the same parameters used to obtain the Poisson distribution in Figure 8-2, i.e. a mean of 40 and a standard deviation of V40. It can be seen that the two distributions are similar, and that the Poisson distribution is very dosely approximated by the continuous Gaussian curve. 

These apply to discrete characteristics which can assume low whole-number values, such as counts of events occurring in area, volume or time. The events should be rare in that the mean number observed should be a small proportion of the total that could possibly be found. Also, finding one count should not influence the probability of finding another. The shape of Poisson distributions is described by only one parameter, the mean number of events observed, and has the special characteristic that the variance is equal to the mean. The shape has a pronounced positive skewness at low mean counts, but becomes more and more symmetrical as the mean number of counts increases (Fig. 41.3). 

Poisson distribution A distribution of metisurements applied to rare events, in which the number of such events depends only on the length of the time interval. The mean and variance of the distribution are equal so that the e.s.d. is proportional to the square root of the measured value. The distribution is named for the French mathematician Simeon D. Poisson. 

---