Physical hazards energy control

Introduction Chemical reactivity is the tendency of substances to undergo chemical change. A chemical reactivity hazard is a situation with the potential for an uncontrolled chemical reaction that can result directly or indirectly in serious harm to people, property, or the environment. A chemical reaction can get out of control whenever the reaction environment is not able to safely absorb the energy and products released by the reaction. The possibility of such situations should be anticipated not only in the reaction step of chemical processes but also in storage, mixing, physical processing, purification, waste treatment, environmental control systems, and any other areas where reactive materials are handled or reactive interactions are possible. 

Throughout the design of a chemical plant, issues relating to safety, economics and environmental impact must be considered. By doing so, the risks associated with the plant can be minimised before actual construction. The same principle applies whatever the scale of the process. The field of process control (Chapter 8) considers all these issues and is, indeed, informed by the type of hazard analyses described in Chapter 10. The objectives of an effective control system are the safe and economic operation of a process plant within the constraints of environmental regulations, stakeholder requirements and what is physically possible. Processes require control in the first place because they are dynamic systems, so the concepts covered in the earlier chapters of this book are central to process control (i.e. control models are based on mass, energy and momentum balances derived with respect to time). Chapter 8 focuses on the key aspects of control systems. 

If controlling the hazards through improved design or engineering is impossible or impractical, the next course of action should be to use physical guards or barriers to separate potential unwanted energy flows or other hazards from potential targets. 

New applieations and improved applicability of many fibres used for clothing, industrial materials and interior decoration require the provisions of new properties in areas sueh as dyeability, static resistance, current control, stain resistance, water absorption, hydrophilicity, water repellency, adhesive ability and so on. There are surface treatment methods that additionally increase the value of textile materials. The methods can be classified as chemical treatment (wet) methods and physieal treatment (dry) methods. Chemical treatment methods are most often used in actual practice. Because of the large amount of energy involved and the high consumption of water and consequently increase of pollution, these techniques are costly and not eco-fiiendly. In addition, these processes treat the fabric in bulk, something which is uimecessaiy and may adversely affect overall product performance. Problems related to toxicity and other health hazards have resulted in the replacement of chemical processing by more eco-friendly physical methods. The physical treatment processes are dry, which makes it possible to preserve certain properties intrinsic to textile materials they are likely to affect the surface of the materials. Therefore the researchers are extensively studying the possibilities of physical surface treatments as alternatives to the chemical treatments. 

The modeling and simulation of Cl and SoS is challenged by the key characteristics of these systems i) coexistence of multiple time scales, from infrastructure evolution to real-time contingencies it) multiple levels of interdependencies and lack of fixed boundaries, i.e. CIs are made of multiple layers (management, information control, energy, physical infrastructure) Hi) broad spectrum of hazards and threats iv) different types of physical flows, i.e. mass, information, power. 

Temperatures required for incineration of these substances range from 550 °C for contaminants based on mineral oil up to 1200 °C. If the contamination is physically inhomogeneous, and variable in composition, it is advisable to use high-temperature incineration. In contrast to hazardous waste incineration plants, thermal soil treatment plants require a 100 percent energy supply, since the heating value of the contaminated soil is practically zero. However, in thermal treatment of contaminated soil better control is possible due to a more balanced condition of the combustion process. 

---