Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phenolic resin, separators

In the second half of the 1960s, at the same time but independently, three basically different plastic separators were developed. One was the polyethylene separator [16] already referred to in starter batteries, used only rarely in stationary batteries, but successful in traction batteries. The others were the microporous phenolic resin separator (DARAK) [18] and a microporous PVC separator [19], both of which became accepted as the standard separation for stationary batteries. They distinguish themselves by high porosity (about 70 percent) and thus very low electrical resistance and very low acid displacement, both important criteria for stationary batteries. [Pg.254]

The reaction mixture is heated and allowed to reflux, under atmospheric pressure at about 100°C. At this stage valve A is open and valve B is closed. Because the reaction is strongly exothermic initially it may be necessary to use cooling water in the jacket at this stage. The condensation reaction will take a number of hours, e.g. 2-4 hours, since under the acidic conditions the formation of phenol-alcohols is rather slow. When the resin separates from the aqueous phase and the resin reaches the requisite degree of condensation, as indicated by refractive index measurements, the valves are changed over (i.e. valve A is closed and valve B opened) and water present is distilled off. [Pg.644]

Reactant for /-butyl phenolic resins. Magnesium oxide reacts in solution with /-butyl phenolic resin to produce an infusible resinate (Fig. 36) which provides improved heat resistance. The resinate has no melting point and decomposes above 200°C. Although oxides of calcium, lead and lithium can also be used, they are not as efficient as magnesium oxide and also tend to separate from solution. Where clear adhesive solutions are required epoxide resins, zinc-calcium resinates or zinc carbonate can be used. [Pg.662]

The formation of a phenolic resin is often formally separated into two steps, though it probably should be three. If we use a three-step model, the first step is activation of the phenol or aldehyde. The second step is methylolation, and the third is condensation or chain extension. In addition to the clarity provided by the formalism, these steps are also generally separated in practice to provide maximum control of exothermic behavior, with the strategy being to separate the exotherm from each step from that of the others as much as possible. As there are significant differences in the activation step and in the details of the methylolation and condensations steps of novolacs and resoles, we will treat the two types separately. [Pg.880]

The development of the starter battery in Japan has taken an independent course (see Sec. 9.2.1.2), visibly expressed by the separator s thick glass mat and its lack of spacing ribs (cf. Fig. 19). The cellulosic backweb impregnated with phenolic resin, generally in use until around 1980 and largely identical to the separator of the same type already mentioned has been completely replaced by thin ( 0.3 mm) fleece materials made of organic fibers. [Pg.267]

The basic materials are sufficiently stable in sulfuric acid not to require the expensive phenolic resin impregnation. Traces of adhesive are applied to hold the glass mat in order to achieve the total thickness. This separation system may be expensive to manufacture, a fact certainly largely balanced by savings in positive active mass, but it also has some indisputable advantages. [Pg.268]

Polyethylene separators offer the best balanced property spectrum excellent mechanical and chemical stability as well as good values for acid availability and electrical resistance have established their breakthrough to be the leading traction battery separator. Rubber separators, phenolic resin-resorcinol separators, and mi-croporous PVC separators are more difficult to handle than polyethylene separators their lack of flexibility does not allow folding into sleeves or use in a meandering assembly in addition they are more expensive. [Pg.276]

Table 12 shows the physicochemical data of separators used in open stationary batteries. Since the emphasis is on low acid displacement, low electrical resistance, and high chemical stability, the phenolic resin-resorcinol separator is understandably the preferred system, even though polyethylene separators, especially at low backweb, are frequently used. For large electrode spacing and consequently high separation thickness, microporous as well as sintered... [Pg.278]

Southern pine, Douglas-fir, and yellow poplar stakes were impregnated with phenolic resin and cured (impreg) or impregnated with phenolic resin, compressed, and cured (compreg). Separate samples were treated with urea-formaldehyde and cured. These samples were placed in the ground and their average lifetime determined. The results are shown in Table I (18). [Pg.58]

Description Acetone and excess phenol are reacted in a BPA synthesis reactor (1), which is packed with a cation-exchange resin catalyst. Higher acetone conversion and selectivity to BPA and long lifetime are characteristic of the catalyst. These properties reduce byproduct formation and catalyst volume. Unreacted acetone, water and some phenol are separated from the reaction mixture by distillations (2-4). Acetone is recycled to the BPA reactor (1) water is efficiently discharged phenol is mixed with feed phenol and purified by distillation (5). The crude-product stream containing BPA, phenol and impurities is transferred to the ciystallizer (6), where ciystalline product is formed and impurities are removed by the mother liquor. Sep-... [Pg.23]

Fig. 55 Chemical structure of complex formation between a phenolic resin and poly(2-vinylpyridine-b-isoprene). TEM-micrograph of the composite, indicating the microphase separation. Reprinted with permission from [201]... Fig. 55 Chemical structure of complex formation between a phenolic resin and poly(2-vinylpyridine-b-isoprene). TEM-micrograph of the composite, indicating the microphase separation. Reprinted with permission from [201]...
The number of publications involved with the recovery of rubidium from seawater is very limited. Most of the work in this field is by Russian scientists, who have proposed several schemes for the combined recovery of rubidium, strontium, and potassium with natural zeolites [15, 19, 250-253, 257]. A number of inorganic sorbents with high selectivity toward rubidium were also synthesized for the recovery of rubidium from natural hydromineral sources, including seawater. Ferrocyanides of the transition-metal ions were shown to exhibit the best properties for this purpose [258, 259]. Mordenite (another natural zeolite) has recently been proposed for selective recovery of rubidium from natural hydromineral sources as well [260]. A review of the properties of inorganic sorbents applicable for the recovery of rubidium from hydromineral sources has been published [261]. Studies of rubidium recovery fix>m seawater [15, 19, 250-253] have shown that the final processing of rubidium concentrates, especially the selective separation of Rb -K mixtures remains the major problem. A report was recently published showing that this problem can be successfully solved by countercurrent ion exchange on phenolic resins [262]. [Pg.133]

The MSC membranes are produced by carbonization of PAN, polymide, and phenolic resins. They contain nanopores, which allow some of the molecules of a feed gas mixture to enter the pore structure at the high pressure side, adsorb, and then diffiise to the low pressure side of the membrane, while excluding the other molecules of the feed gas. Thus, separation is based on the difference in the molecular sizes of the feed gas components. The smaller molecules preferentially diffuse through the MSC membrane as shown by Table 4 [16,17]. [Pg.76]

Carbon molecular sieve membranes. Molecular sieve carbons can be produced by controlled pyrolysis of selected polymers as mentioned in 3.2.7 Pyrolysis. Carbon molecular sieves with a mean pore diameter from 025 to 1 nm are known to have high separation selectivities for molecules differing by as little as 0.02 nm in critical dimensions. Besides the separation properties, these amorphous materials with more or less regular pore structures may also provide catalytic properties. Carbon molecular sieve membranes in sheet and hollow fiber (with a fiber outer diameter of 5 pm to 1 mm) forms can be derived from cellulose and its derivatives, certain acrylics, peach-tar mesophase or certain thermosetting polymers such as phenolic resins and oxidized polyacrylonitrile by pyrolysis in an inert atmosphere [Koresh and Soffer, 1983 Soffer et al., 1987 Murphy, 1988]. [Pg.70]

Separation of benzene/cyclohexane mixture is investigated most extensively. This is not surprising because separation of this mixture is very important in practical terms. Benzene is used to produce a broad range of valuable chemical products styrene (polystyrene plastics and synthetic rubber), phenol (phenolic resins), cyclohexane (nylon), aniline, maleic anhydride (polyester resins), alkylbenzenes and chlorobenzenes, drugs, dyes, plastics, and as a solvent. Cyclohexane is used as a solvent in the plastics industry and in the conversion of the intermediate cyclohexanone, a feedstock for nylon precursors such as adipic acid. E-caprolactam, and hexamethylenediamine. Cyclohexane is produced mainly by catalytic hydrogenation of benzene. The unreacted benzene is present in the reactor s effluent stream and must be removed for pure cyclohexane recovery. [Pg.257]

Thermosetting phenolic resins form a separate class of polymers containing aromatic rings and aliphatic carbon groups in the polymeric network. These resins are formed from the reaction of phenol (or substituted phenols) with formaldehyde. The fully crosslinked macromolecule is insoluble and infusible. Other thermosetting resins are known in practice, some derived from the reaction of melamine or of urea with formaldehyde. Because these have a different chemical structure, containing nitrogen, they are included in a different class (see Section 15.3). [Pg.463]


See other pages where Phenolic resin, separators is mentioned: [Pg.612]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.1059]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.1386]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.117]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.267 ]




SEARCH



Microporous phenolic resin separator DARAK

Phenol resin

Phenol separators

Phenol-Formaldehyde Resin-Resorcinol Separators (DARAK

Phenol-formaldehyde resin resorcinol separator

Phenolic resins

Resins, separators

© 2024 chempedia.info