Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phase separation efficiency

Factors which are reponed to influence the phase separation efficiency of sandwich-type membrane separators include ... [Pg.55]

Although the phase separation efficiency will no doubt be enhanced by larger membrane areas, the mechanical subility of the membrane is reduced by an increase in area, while analyte dispersion may also be increased. Screen supported and polyethylene-backed membranes are more durable (cf. Sec. 3.2.3, Separation membranes) so that larger exposed membrane areas are applicable. However, the screens partially obstruct the membranes, and their use is not always justified when overall performance, including analyte dispersion is considered. [Pg.55]

The main drawback of the sandwich-type membrane separator is associated with the limited lifetime of the membrane. Operations are interrupted periodically due to breakdown of the membrane, which is particularly objectionable for applications in process control or continuous monitoring. In such cases, it is advisable to use a supporting grid for the membrane to prolong its lifetime, possibly with some sacrifice in the phase separation efficiency. [Pg.57]

Another important characteristic of a gas chromatographic column is the thickness of the stationary phase. As shown in equation 12.25, separation efficiency improves with thinner films. The most common film thickness is 0.25 pm. Thicker films are used for highly volatile solutes, such as gases, because they have a greater capacity for retaining such solutes. Thinner films are used when separating solutes of low volatility, such as steroids. [Pg.567]

The electroosmotic flow profile is very different from that for a phase moving under forced pressure. Figure 12.40 compares the flow profile for electroosmosis with that for hydrodynamic pressure. The uniform, flat profile for electroosmosis helps to minimize band broadening in capillary electrophoresis, thus improving separation efficiency. [Pg.599]

Capillary Electrochromatography Another approach to separating neutral species is capillary electrochromatography (CEC). In this technique the capillary tubing is packed with 1.5-3-pm silica particles coated with a bonded, nonpolar stationary phase. Neutral species separate based on their ability to partition between the stationary phase and the buffer solution (which, due to electroosmotic flow, is the mobile phase). Separations are similar to the analogous HPLC separation, but without the need for high-pressure pumps, furthermore, efficiency in CEC is better than in HPLC, with shorter analysis times. [Pg.607]

Two gas chromatograms showing the effect of polarity of the stationary phase on the separation efficiency for three substances of increasing polarity toluene, pyridine, and benzaldehyde. (a) Separation on silicone SE-30, a nonpolar phase, and (b) separation on elastomer OV-351, a more polar phase. Note the greatly changed absolute and relative retention times the more polar pyridine and benzaldehyde are affected most by the move to a more polar stationary phase. [Pg.249]

Many industrial processes involve a chemical reaction between two Hquid phases, for example nitration (qv), sulfonation (see Sulfonation and sulfation), alkylation (qv), and saponification. These processes are not always considered to be extractions because the main objective is a new chemical product, rather than separation (30). However these processes have many features in common with extraction, for example the need to maintain a high interfacial area with the aid of agitation and the importance of efficient phase separation after the reaction is completed. [Pg.62]

Monoalkyl phosphate extractants exhibit good efficiency in the presence of dilute nitrate, sulfate, or chloride, and cause fewer phase-separation... [Pg.317]

A. Studer, S. Hadida, R. Ferritto, S.Y. Kim, P. Jeyer, P. Wipf, D.P. Curran, Fluorous synthesis — A fluorous-phase strategy for improving separation efficiency in organic synthesis. Science 275 823-826 1997. [Pg.79]

Theoretical representation of the behaviour of a hydrocyclone requires adequate analysis of three distinct physical phenomenon taking place in these devices, viz. the understanding of fluid flow, its interactions with the dispersed solid phase and the quantification of shear induced attrition of crystals. Simplified analytical solutions to conservation of mass and momentum equations derived from the Navier-Stokes equation can be used to quantify fluid flow in the hydrocyclone. For dilute slurries, once bulk flow has been quantified in terms of spatial components of velocity, crystal motion can then be traced by balancing forces on the crystals themselves to map out their trajectories. The trajectories for different sizes can then be used to develop a separation efficiency curve, which quantifies performance of the vessel (Bloor and Ingham, 1987). In principle, population balances can be included for crystal attrition in the above description for developing a thorough mathematical model. [Pg.115]

Trays operate within a hydraulic envelope. At excessively high vapor rates, liquid is carried upward from one tray to the next (essentially back mixing the liquid phase in the tower). For valve trays and sieve trays,. i capacity limit can be reached at low vapor rates when liquid falls through the rray floor rather than being forced across the active area into tlic downcomers. Because the liquid does not flow across the trays, it rass.scs contact with the vapor, and the separation efficiency drops dramatically. ... [Pg.142]

Models of a second type (Sec. IV) restrict themselves to a few very basic ingredients, e.g., the repulsion between oil and water and the orientation of the amphiphiles. They are less versatile than chain models and have to be specified in view of the particular problem one has in mind. On the other hand, they allow an efficient study of structures on intermediate length and time scales, while still establishing a connection with microscopic properties of the materials. Hence, they bridge between the microscopic approaches and the more phenomenological treatments which will be described below. Various microscopic models of this type have been constructed and used to study phase transitions in the bulk of amphiphihc systems, internal phase transitions in monolayers and bilayers, interfacial properties, and dynamical aspects such as the kinetics of phase separation between water and oil in the presence of amphiphiles. [Pg.638]

FIGURE 13.57 NOTE The importance of Solvent/column interaction using Jordi DVB columns cannot be over emphasized. We have found that a SOySO mbc of MeOH/ACN for the strong solvent Is adequate for many reverse phase separations and is better than either alone. We have now observed that the use of THF/ACN as strong solvent is often better than MeOH/ACN. In general Lewis bases (electron donor solvents) deactivate the aromatic rings and often dramatically increase column efficiencies. [Pg.400]

Column manufacturers normally provide basic information about their columns, such as plate count, particle size, exclusion limit, and calibration curve. This information is necessary and fundamental, however, it is not sufficient to allow users to make an intelligent decision about a column for a specific application. For example, separation efficiency, the dependence of separation efficiency on the mobile phase, the ability to separate the system peaks from the polymer peak, the symmetry of the polymer peak, and the possible interaction with polymers are seldom provided. [Pg.500]

Comparison of the separation efficiency between two columns in the same mobile phase or one column in two mobile phases is based on the extent of resolution of the peaks of the PEO standards in the respective chromatograms of the PEO A, B, and C group. Due to the limitation of space, only the TSK PEO A chromatograms for the four columns in water and water/methanol are... [Pg.510]

In the elucidation of retention mechanisms, an advantage of using enantiomers as templates is that nonspecific binding, which affects both enantiomers equally, cancels out. Therefore the separation factor (a) uniquely reflects the contribution to binding from the enantioselectively imprinted sites. As an additional comparison the retention on the imprinted phase is compared with the retention on a nonimprinted reference phase. The efficiency of the separations is routinely characterized by estimating a number of theoretical plates (N), a resolution factor (R ) and a peak asymmetry factor (A ) [19]. These quantities are affected by the quality of the packing and mass transfer limitations, as well as of the amount and distribution of the binding sites. [Pg.154]

A minimum HETP or HTU represents a maximum separation efficiency with a representing the relative volatility, i.e., vapor and liquid phase compositions of the more volatile component in a binary system ... [Pg.376]

Consequently, interpenetrating phase-separated D/A network composites, i.e. bulk heterojunction , would appear to be ideal photovoltaic materials [5]. By controlling the morphology of the phase separation into an interpenetrating network, one can achieve a high interfacial area within a bulk material. Since any point in the composite is within a few nanometers of a D/A interface, such a composite is a bulk D/A heterojunction material. If the network in a device is bicontinuous, as shown in Figure 15-26, the collection efficiency can be equally efficient. [Pg.286]


See other pages where Phase separation efficiency is mentioned: [Pg.35]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.1989]    [Pg.2060]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.175]   


SEARCH



Accelerating Separations through Efficiency Improvement of Stationary Phases

Separating efficiency

Separation efficiency

Separation efficiency mobile phase velocity

© 2024 chempedia.info