Pervaporation selectivity

Koops et al. [39] investigated the pervaporation selectivity as a function of membrane thickness for the polysulfone, poly(vinyl chloride) and poly(acrylonitrile) membranes in the dehydration of acetic acid and reported that selectivity decreases with decreasing membrane thickness, below a limiting value of about 15 pm. 

Figure VI - 25. Sorption selectivity fleft) and pervaporation selectivity (right) as a function of the...

Pervaporation Selectivity High product enrichment Easy to sterilize Low mass transfer Internal or external... 

This equation shows that the separation achieved in pervaporation is proportional to the product of the separation achieved by evaporation of the Hquid and the separation achieved by permeation of the components through a membrane. To achieve good separations both terms should be large. It follows that, in general, pervaporation is most suited to the removal of volatile components from relatively involatile components, because will then be large. However, if the membrane is sufficientiy selective and P g is large, nonvolatile components can be made to permeate the membrane preferentially (88). 

The selectivity of pervaporation membranes varies considerably and has a critical effect on the overall separation obtained. The range of results that can be obtained for the same solutions and different membranes is illustrated in Figure 41 for the separation of acetone from water using two types of membrane (89). The figure shows the concentration of acetone in the permeate as a function of the concentration in the feed. The two membranes shown have dramatically different properties. The siUcone mbber membrane removes acetone selectively, whereas the cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) membrane removes water selectively. This difference occurs because siUcone mbber is hydrophobic and mbbery, thus permeates the acetone preferentially. PVA, on the other hand, is hydrophilic and glassy, thus permeates the small hydrophilic water molecules preferentially. 

Fig. 41. The pervaporation separation of acetone—water mixtures achieved with a water-selective poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) membrane and with an acetone-selective siUcone mbber membrane. The PVA membrane is best suited to removing small amounts of water from a concentrated acetone solution, whereas the siUcone mbber membrane is best suited to removing small amounts of acetone from a dilute acetone stream (89).

Pervaporation. Vapor arbitrated pervaporation is used to remove ethanol from whiskey by selective passage of the alcohol through a membrane. Whiskey flows on one side of a membrane. A water-vapor stream flows on the other side and sweeps away the ethanol that permeates the membrane. Thus alcohol reduction and selective retention of flavor and aroma components can be achieved usiag membranes with a particular porosity. The ethanol can be recovered by condensing or scmbbiag the vapor stream. Pervaporation systems operate at or slightly above atmospheric pressure (Fig. 

Advantages to Membrane Separation This subsertion covers the commercially important membrane applications. AU except electrodialysis are pressure driven. All except pervaporation involve no phase change. All tend to be inherently low-energy consumers in the-oiy if not in practice. They operate by a different mechanism than do other separation methods, so they have a unique profile of strengths and weaknesses. In some cases they provide unusual sharpness of separation, but in most cases they perform a separation at lower cost, provide more valuable products, and do so with fewer undesirable side effects than older separations methods. The membrane interposes a new phase between feed and product. It controls the transfer of mass between feed and product. It is a kinetic, not an equihbrium process. In a separation, a membrane will be selective because it passes some components much more rapidly than others. Many membranes are veiy selective. Membrane separations are often simpler than the alternatives. 

An important characteristic of pervaporation that distinguishes it from distillation is that it is a rate process, not an equilibrium process. The more permeable component may be the less-volatile component. Perv oration has its greatest iitihty in the resolution of azeotropes, as an acqiinct to distillation. Selecting a membrane permeable to the minor corTiponent is important, since the membrane area required is roughly proportional to the mass of permeate. Thus pervaporation devices for the purification of the ethanol-water azeotrope (95 percent ethanol) are always based on a hydrophihc membrane. 

Membrane Pervaporation Since 1987, membrane pei vapora-tion has become widely accepted in the CPI as an effective means of separation and recovery of liquid-phase process streams. It is most commonly used to dehydrate hquid hydrocarbons to yield a high-purity ethanol, isopropanol, and ethylene glycol product. The method basically consists of a selec tively-permeable membrane layer separating a liquid feed stream and a gas phase permeate stream as shown in Fig. 25-19. The permeation rate and selectivity is governed bv the physicochemical composition of the membrane. Pei vaporation differs From reverse osmosis systems in that the permeate rate is not a function of osmotic pressure, since the permeate is maintained at saturation pressure (Ref. 24). 

The most common membrane systems are driven by pressure. The essence of a pressure-driven membrane process is to selectively permeate one or more species through the membrane. The stream retained at the high pressure side is called the retentate while that transported to the low pressure side is denoted by the permeate (Fig. 11.1). Pressure-driven membrane systems include microfiltration, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, pervaporation and gas/vapor permeation. Table ll.l summarizes the main features and applications of these systems. 

When ionic liquids are used as replacements for organic solvents in processes with nonvolatile products, downstream processing may become complicated. This may apply to many biotransformations in which the better selectivity of the biocatalyst is used to transform more complex molecules. In such cases, product isolation can be achieved by, for example, extraction with supercritical CO2 [50]. Recently, membrane processes such as pervaporation and nanofiltration have been used. The use of pervaporation for less volatile compounds such as phenylethanol has been reported by Crespo and co-workers [51]. We have developed a separation process based on nanofiltration [52, 53] which is especially well suited for isolation of nonvolatile compounds such as carbohydrates or charged compounds. It may also be used for easy recovery and/or purification of ionic liquids. 

The preferred choice of a water-selective membrane up to now has been hydrophilic membranes because of their high water affinity. However, recently Kuhn et al. reported an all-silica DDR membrane for dehydration of ethanol and methanol with high fluxes (up to 20kg m h ) and high selectivities (H20/ethanol 1500 and H20/methanol 70 at 373 K) in pervaporation operation. The separation is based on molecular sieving with water fluxes comparable to well-performing hydrophilic membranes [51]. 

Bowen et al. [94] made a B-MFI membrane on a monohthic support. The pervaporation fluxes and selectivities of several alcohol/water mixtures were comparable to similar tubular-based B-MFI membranes, demonstrating the scale-up, although, for pervaporation, the quality requirements are much more forgiving. Kuhn etal. tested a multicharuiel high-silica MFI membrane for ethanol/water separation. The membrane was supphed by NGK Insulators and, also, in this case, the multicharuiel membrane measures up to its tubular counterparts [95] (Figure 10.8). 

Process Description Pervaporation is a separation process in which a liquid mixture contacts a nonporous permselective membrane. One component is transported through the membrane preferentially. It evaporates on the downstream side of the membrane leaving as a vapor. The name is a contraction of permeation and evaporation. Permeation is induced by lowering partial pressure of the permeating component, usually by vacuum or occasionally with a sweep gas. The permeate is then condensed or recovered. Thus, three steps are necessary Sorption of the permeating components into the membrane, diffusive transport across the nonporous membrane, then desorption into the permeate space, with a heat effect. Pervaporation membranes are chosen for high selectivity, and the permeate is often highly purified. 

So far, the separation of azeotropic systems has been restricted to the use of pressure shift and the use of entrainers. The third method is to use a membrane to alter the vapor-liquid equilibrium behavior. Pervaporation differs from other membrane processes in that the phase-state on one side of the membrane is different from the other side. The feed to the membrane is a liquid mixture at a high-enough pressure to maintain it in the liquid phase. The other side of the membrane is maintained at a pressure at or below the dew point of the permeate, maintaining it in the vapor phase. Dense membranes are used for pervaporation, and selectivity results from chemical affinity (see Chapter 10). Most pervaporation membranes in commercial use are hydrophyllic19. This means that they preferentially allow... 

The selective separation of water from aqueous solutions of isopropanol or the dehydration of isopropanol can be carried out with different membranes, which contain polar groups, either in the backbone or as pendent moieties. For the dehydration of such a mixture, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and PVA-based membranes have been used extensively. PVA is the primary material from which the commercial membranes are fabricated and has been studied intensively for pervaporation because of its excellent film forming, high hydrophilicity due to -OH groups as pendant moieties, and chemical-resistant properties. On the contrary, PVA has poor stability at higher water concentrations, and hence selectivity decreases remarkably. 

Hybrid membranes composed of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), synthetised via hydrolysis and a co-condensation reaction for the pervaporation separation of water-isopropanol mixtures has also been reported [32], These hybrid membranes show a significant improvement in the membrane performance for water-isopropanol mixture separation. The separation factor increased drastically upon increasing the crosslinking (TEOS) density due to a reduction of free volume and increased chain stiffness. However, the separation factor decreased drastically when PVA was crosslinked with the highest amount of TEOS (mass ratio of TEOS to PVA is 2 1). The highest separation selectivity is found to be 900 for PVA TEOS (1.5 1 w/w) at 30°C. For all membranes, the selectivity decreased drastically up to 20 mass % of water in the feed and then remained almost constant beyond 20 mass %, signifying that the separation selectivity is much influenced at lower composition of water in the feed. 

In a previous section, the effect of plasma on PVA surface for pervaporation processes was also mentioned. In fact, plasma treatment is a surface-modification method to control the hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity balance of polymer materials in order to optimize their properties in various domains, such as adhesion, biocompatibility and membrane-separation techniques. Non-porous PVA membranes were prepared by the cast-evaporating method and covered with an allyl alcohol or acrylic acid plasma-polymerized layer the effect of plasma treatment on the increase of PVA membrane surface hydrophobicity was checked [37].The allyl alcohol plasma layer was weakly crosslinked, in contrast to the acrylic acid layer. The best results for the dehydration of ethanol were obtained using allyl alcohol treatment. The selectivity of treated membrane (H20 wt% in the pervaporate in the range 83-92 and a water selectivity, aH2o, of 250 at 25 °C) is higher than that of the non-treated one (aH2o = 19) as well as that of the acrylic acid treated membrane (aH2o = 22). 

Membranes of PVA/PAcr.Ac blends evidence a selective permeability against different components of a liquid mixture. So, they may be used for the ethanol dehydration by pervaporation technique. 

Recently, a novel hydrophylic polymer membrane based on poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAA.HC1)/PVA, crosslinked with GA, has been also tested for methanol dehydration by pervaporation technique [33], Even if the reported results show a small selectivity of the last type of membrane, the blend s composition, the curing degree and the process conditions (temperature, feed concentration, etc.) could be used to obtain a better separation of methanol. 

Figure 8.21. Comparison of selectivity of pervaporation membranes and liquid-vapour equilibrium for...

---