Performing Exposure Measurements

The techniques of measurement of exposure concentrations of hazardous substances in the air of workplaces can be either 

The choice of method depends on the question to be answered. Whereas measurements covering a whole work shift in order to determine the 8-h shift concentration are preferably done by personal air sampling, short-term measurements are often performed using the stationary technique. 

In principle, all measurements have to take place under representative conditions. In exceptional cases, special measurements can be appropriate in order to determine additional safety actions. All relevant conditions at the time of the exposure measurements have to be recorded together with the analytical results obtained in order to be able to reproduce or assess the workplace situation at a later point of time. 

To avoid any inconsistencies in the final results, one should only deviate from the measurement plan after consultation with the responsible person. All activities of the workers should be recorded and documented in detail as much as possible otherwise the results may not be interpretable. The use of a form as a standardized work description for the documentation of all tasks during a measurement has been proved to be valuable in practice. It should include the person s name. In most cases not every member of a work force can be used for measurements. Therefore it is important to select representative test persons belonging to a similar exposure group. 

The above-mentioned work description should include information on the sampling technique, for example  

---

Many exposure measurements of different types of work areas have been performed in order to establish criteria and requirements imder which the limit value can be guaranteed permanently and securely to exempt companies meriting these criteria from performing exposure measurements. 

According to our interviews, another more fundamental reason for the lack of this kind of data is that only a minority of employers perform exposure measurements (subjectively estimated at about 5 per cent or less, based on the experience of labour inspection in one of the Lander). 

Fenske, R.A. (1988) Comparative assessment of protective clothing performance by measurement of dermal exposure during pesticide applications, Appl. Ind. Hygiene, 3 207-213. 

A spin-off of all of these task forces has been the open discussions that have led to improved design considerations and effective use of resources in the conduct of field exposure studies. These task forces have evaluated a variety of exposure measuring techniques, developed study designs for conducting studies, and performed field studies in a uniform and efficient manner. The task force protocols and designs have become models for the industry, having received valuable input and approval from the regulatory community. 

Blood counts are also used to determine toxic exposures. Measurements of the red and white blood cells, hemoglobin content, and platelet count are performed easily and inexpensively. However, blood counts are frequently insensitive to toxic exposure marked changes are seen only after substantial exposure and damage. 

In the operant performance test (Ritchie et al. 2001), groups of four rats were exposed separately for four successive test sessions to each test concentration. Performance was measured by the number of food rewards earned in a specific time. The exposures to HFC-134a were for approximately 15 min and were either preceded or followed by a 15-min exposure to room air. Atmospheres were measured with infrared spectrometry. Compared with the air exposures, there were no significant differences in any performance measures during exposures at 40,000 to 100,000 ppm. At 140,000 ppm, food rewards earned were significantly reduced, although the error-to-reward ratios were significantly increased. 

Bromomethane may be isolated from biological materials either by extraction into an organic solvent, or simply by collecting headspace vapors. Table 6-1 summarizes several methods used by researchers for measuring parent bromomethane in blood or tissues. Detection limits are sufficiently low that levels in blood or tissue associated with health effects can easily be measured. However, as discussed in Section 2.3.4, parent bromomethane is cleared from blood and tissues quite rapidly, so detection of bromomethane exposure in humans is typically performed by measuring serum bromide levels instead. Several methods for measuring bromide ion in serum are also presented in Table 6-1. These methods are also sufficiently sensitive that detection limits (0.5-2.5 ppm) are lower than typical levels of bromide in serum of unexposed people (5-15 ppm), and increases due to bromomethane exposure can easily be measured (Alexeeff and Kilgore 1983). 

Trainee health outcomes Number of medical procedures performed Educational performance in relation to on-call schedules (e.g., postcall vs. no call) National registry of resident motor vehicle crashes and relevant covariates (e.g., work schedules, distance driven, time of day, work-related and non-work-related exposure measures) Longitudinal database of resident health outcomes relative to an appropriate control group (e.g., dentist trainees) Health outcomes from a variety of domains, including mental health and substance use disorders, pregnancy, endocrine, cardiovascular, and neurological... 

Koerfer (15) performed an interesting study with a series of perforated and smooth rotating discs 600 mm in diameter at speeds up to 600 rpm. The mass transfer performance was measured using the oxygen/water system, with the results shown in Figure 17. Very good performance was recorded with the perforated discs, and this was attributed partly to the short exposure time of the film as it negotiated each perforation and partly to the extra film area created. 

An equivalence approach has been and continues to be recommended for BE comparisons. The recommended approach relies on (1) a criterion to allow the comparison, (2) a confidence interval (Cl) for the criterion, and (3) a BE limit. Log-transformation of exposure measures before statistical analysis is recommended. BE studies are performed as single-dose, crossover studies. To compare measures in these studies, data have been analyzed using an average BE criterion. This guidance recommends continued use of an average BE criterion to compare BA measures for replicate and nonreplicate BE studies of both immediate- and modihed-release products. 

An exploratory analysis was performed using a four-factor ANOVA model, with treatment, period, and sequence as fixed factors and subject within sequence as random factor. The results from the ANOVA were used to calculate the back-transformed 90 % confidence intervals (Cl) for the differences between the fed and fasted condition in the log-transformed exposure measurements (Cmax, AUCo-t and AUCo-cc). For Cmax the difference between fasting and fed conditions was found to be statistically significant while this was not the case for the AUC parameters. 

To perform a risk assessment and then prioritize the exposure measurement effort requires an approximate initial exposure potential assessment. For each chemical present and for each source of exposure for that chemical, an estimate of exposure can be made. These exposure estimates combined with a toxicity estimate from the hazard data can then be combined to yield a risk estimate which can be used as a basis for prioritization of the measurement and monitoring effort. 

Evaluation of exposure usually is performed by measuring the amount of contaminants) in the whole organism. This will provide a preliminary indication of the bioavailability of a group of contaminants with respect to the organism. Furthermore, the presence of adducts to proteins or DNA offers the opportunity to assess their respective affinity or reactivity towards biological molecules. 

There is a new project with die aim of developing a method which combines the advantages of microelectrochemistiy and of SPM. It should be possible to perform microelectrochemical measurements and SPM investigations at the same local points on a sample. This technique will allow observations of corrosion attacks and their surroundings before and after exposure to corrosive conditions. 

Further examination of these activities gives an indication of the extent, diversity and role of monitoring. It shows developments related to the establishment of an OEL (in this case a TRK) value for a certain substance (wood dust), its significance / meaning for improvement of health and safety at enterprise level, and the complexity of the whole framework. The overwhelming majority of the data collected has its origin in studies performed by either the BG Holz or by the State authorities. Studies based on exposure measurements performed by... 

Notwithstanding the fact on whether or not a work area is exempted ftom exposure measurements, other obligations of the employer according to the Ordinance of Hazardous Susbstances remain in force like its obligation to use less hazardous substitutes if available, to respect the hierarchy of protective measures, to eqip every workplace with an operating instructions and to perform regular trainings for the workforce. 

Biological monitoring for recent, as opposed to more remote, exposure to tetrachloroethylene has also been performed by measuring concentrations of tetrachloroethylene and its principal metabolite, TCA, in blood and urine. However, TCA is not specific fortetrachloroethylene because it is also produced from the metabolism of trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (Monster 1988). In a study of occupationally exposed individuals, measurements of tetrachloroethylene and TCA in the blood 15-30 minutes after the end of the workday at the end of the week were judged to be the best parameters for estimating exposure to the chemical. The best noninvasive method for determining tetrachloroethylene exposure was to measure the concentration of the parent compound in exhaled air. After exposure to a... 

---