Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Standards particle

The 1000 A column did not show any resolution between 312 nm and 57 nm particle sizes. Shown in Fig.2 are the calibration curves for the 2000 A and 3000 A columns and for their combination. The 57 nm particle standard appears to have been erroneously characterized by the supplier. This was subsequently confirmed by electron microscopy. The 2000 X column exhibited a sharp upturn in its calibration curve close to the exclusion limit. It is to be noted that while data points corresponding to 312 and 275 nm diameter particles appear on individual column calibration curves, they are not indicated for the calibration curve of the combination. This is because these larger diameter particles were completely retained in the packed colimms, generating no detector response. The percentage recovery for these particles from individual columns was considerably less than 100 resulting in their complete retention when the columns were combined in series. [Pg.49]

The micrographs however, revealed that the latex particle standards were not monodispersed as claimed by the suppliers. This can clearly be noted from the micrographs in Fig. U,a-e. They indicate a distinct polydispersity the micrographs of the 2T5 and 312 nm samples in fact reveal two distinct particle populations. [Pg.52]

All liposphere formulations prepared remained stable during the 3-month period of the study, and no phase separation or appearance of aggregates were observed. The difference between polymeric lipospheres and the standard liposphere formulations is the composition of the internal core of the particles. Standard lipospheres, such as those previously described, consist of a solid hydrophobic fat core composed of neutral fats like tristearin, whereas, in the polymeric lipospheres, biodegradable polymers such as polylactide or polycaprolactone were substituted for the triglycerides. Both types of lipospheres are thought to be stabilized by one layer of phospholipid molecules embedded in their surface. [Pg.6]

Fig. 8-33. Energy diagram showing a shift of redox electron level due to complexation of reductant and oxidant particles (1) afSnity for complexation is greater with oxidants than with reductants, (2) affinity for complexation is greater with reductants than with oxidants. COMPLEX z ligand-coordinated complex redox particles HYDRATE = simply hydrated redox particles W = probability density of electron states e., ) - standard Fermi level of hydrated redox particles - standard Fermi level of ligand-coordinated... Fig. 8-33. Energy diagram showing a shift of redox electron level due to complexation of reductant and oxidant particles (1) afSnity for complexation is greater with oxidants than with reductants, (2) affinity for complexation is greater with reductants than with oxidants. COMPLEX z ligand-coordinated complex redox particles HYDRATE = simply hydrated redox particles W = probability density of electron states e., ) - standard Fermi level of hydrated redox particles - standard Fermi level of ligand-coordinated...
Step 2. Prepare sources in duplicate for the proportional counter by pipetting the appropriate volume - typically 100X - specified by the instructor of each of 3 standard solutions and the unknown solution onto the center of a separate planchet. You will have a total of 8 planchets 2 each for the beta-particle standards and the unknown beta-particle sample. Dry under heat lamps placed at sufficient distance over the planchets for slow drying. [Pg.19]

Step 3. Place in the counter sample changing system the planchets with the the beta-particle standard sources and the unknown beta-particle sample. Add two background planchets. Set the time control to count each sample for a time period specified by the instructor so that each accumulated count is at least 1,000 counts (typically, 500 s per sample, 50,000 s per background). Count each of the samples at settings (a) and (b). Repeat the count. Record your measurements in Data Table 2A.2. [Pg.19]

Step 4. Count one of the beta-particle standard sources 10 times, using setting (a). Record your measurements in Data Table 2A.3. [Pg.19]

What is the significance of la, 2a, and 3a deviations reported with a numerical value For the beta-particle standard solution counted repeatedly, what percentage of the values is in the range of +la to -la ... [Pg.21]

Axions need a big box by particle standards. Have you ever worried about a Heisenberg uncertainty size for something with a mass of 1 O 5 eV at T = 3K We get 2.2 mm. And they have such a box, a big chunk of a Reviews of Modem Physics (66). [Pg.191]

The radioactive isotope 89Sr (also known by the pharmaceutical brand name Metastron ) is used as a cancer therapeutic to alleviate bone pain. 85Sr has been used in medical applications, such as radiologic imagining of bones, in minor commercial applications, such as thermoelectric power generation, as a beta-particle standard source, and in instruments that measure thickness and density of materials (Murray 1994). [Pg.237]

Function General expression (per particle) Standard state of a perfect gas (1 mol)a... [Pg.121]

The USEPA is in the process of revising the particulate matter standards, with one of the proposals being the introduction of a coarse particle standard for particulate matter between 2.5 and 10 pm (USEPA 2008b). This process and schedule of this review is based on two key components in the national ambient air quality... [Pg.603]

Particulate matter (PM) is found in flue gas from PC power plant and in raw syn gas from coal gasification. PM causes air pollution, and it is regulated by the U.S. EPA. PM2 5 is a fine particle standard (<2.5 pm particles) with the 24 h emissions regulated at 35 pg/m PMjq is a coarse particle standard (<10 pm particles) with the 24 h emissions regulated at 150 pg/m [62]. [Pg.495]

Only small particles are not responsible for fast resolution and sensitivity. Some special instrumentation system should be designed. The special kind of system capable of delivering the pressmes required to utilize the potential of UPLC has been reported in the literature [38,49]. Small particles alone do not make it possible to fulfill the promises of the van Deemter equation. Instrument technology also had to keep pace to truly take advantage of the increased speed, superior resolution, and sensitivity afforded by smaller particles. Standard HPLC technology (pumps, injectors, and detectors) simply does not have the horsepower to take full advantage of sub-2 pm particles. [Pg.395]

Rat lung inflammation 24 h after intratracheal instillation of diesel exhaust particles (Standard Reference Material 2975) initially exposed to 0.1 ppm [ 0]03 for 48 h was more potent in increasing neutrophilia, lavage total protein, and lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1.27) activity compared to unexposed diesel exhaust particles (Madden et al. 2000). Exposure of diesel exhaust particles to 1 ppm O3 led to a decreased bioactivity of the particles. [Pg.355]

Calcination conditions Diameter of Au particles standard deviation... [Pg.232]

Systematic studies in our laboratory have indicated the presence of a second lift force that acts on the particles. These studies involved the measurement of retention times for a set of PS particle standards under wide ranging conditions of flowrate and field strength. [Pg.283]


See other pages where Standards particle is mentioned: [Pg.52]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.2574]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.672]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.52 ]




SEARCH



British Standards particle density

Occupational particle standards

Particle Size Reference Standards

Particle Standard model

Particle composition shape, standards

Particle composition standards

Particle size distribution standard expressions

Particle size standards

Particle-size distribution standard deviation

Standard Model of elementary particles

Wear particles standards

© 2024 chempedia.info