Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particle by electron microscopy

In view of the problems involved with the particle size measurement of soft particles by electron microscopy and the uncertainty In surface coverage by oleate soap molecules which were discussed in the introduction, agreement between the V/S average electron microscope measurements and polymerization rate measurements for these latexes Is quite acceptable. [Pg.129]

Shindo, D., Lee, B.T., Waseda, Y, Muramatsu, A., and Sugimoto, T., Crystallography of platelet-type hematite particles by electron microscopy, Mater Trans. JIM, 34, 580, 1993. [Pg.704]

In this paper, we review the determination of the shape and the structure of metal particles by electron microscopy as illustrated by examples of Pd clusters epitaxially oriented on oxide single crystals and thin films of MgO and ZnO. The metal-oxide interfaces are characterized by HRTEM profile-view imaging, numerical analysis of the images, and image simulations by the multi-slice technique. [Pg.1195]

Tence, M., Chevalier, J.P. and JuUien, R. (1986). On the Measurement of the fractal dimension of aggregated particles by electron-microscopy - experimental method, corrections and comparison with numerical models. J. Phys. (Paris), 47, 1989-1998. [Pg.310]

The earliest observation of soil particles by electron microscopy dates back to 1940, when a preparation scheme for the identification of airborne particles at magnifications up to 200 000x was initially published in 1946. It was, however, not until the mid-1970s that the first papers dealing with suspended aquatic particulates finally appeared. Since then more than a 1000 publications have been reported to link the use of electron microscopies to environmental particles and colloids. Historically, electron microscopies have been exploited for the evidencing... [Pg.3086]

Comparison of particle diameter of colloidal silica by electron microscopy (cf,). by nitrogen adsorption (d ) and by light scattering (d,)... [Pg.65]

The specific surface estimated from particle size determined by electron microscopy was I lOm g . [Pg.212]

Particle Size. Wet sieve analyses are commonly used in the 20 )J.m (using microsieves) to 150 )J.m size range. Sizes in the 1—10 )J.m range are analyzed by light-transmission Hquid-phase sedimentation, laser beam diffraction, or potentiometric variation methods. Electron microscopy is the only rehable procedure for characterizing submicrometer particles. Scanning electron microscopy is useful for characterizing particle shape, and the relation of particle shape to slurry stabiUty. [Pg.349]

Cationic quaternary ammonium compounds such as distearyldimethylammonium-chloride (DSDMAC) used as a softener and as an antistatic, form hydrated particles in a dispersed phase having a similar structure to that of the multilayered liposomes or vesicles of phospholipids 77,79). This liposome-like structure could be made visible by electron microscopy using the freeze-fracture replica technique as shown by Okumura et al. 79). The concentric circles observed should be bimolecular lamellar layers with the sandwiched parts being the entrapped water. In addition, the longest spacings of the small angle X-ray diffraction pattern can be attributed to the inter-lamellar distances. These liposome structures are formed by the hydrated detergent not only in the gel state but also at relatively low concentrations. [Pg.12]

Particle Formation, Electron microscopy and optical microscopy are the diagnostic tools most often used to study particle formation and growth in precipitation polymerizations (7 8). However, in typical polymerizations of this type, the particle formation is normally completed in a few seconds or tens of seconds after the start of the reaction (9 ), and the physical processes which are involved are difficult to measure in a real time manner. As a result, the actual particle formation mechanism is open to a variety of interpretations and the results could fit more than one theoretical model. Barrett and Thomas (10) have presented an excellent review of the four physical processes involved in the particle formation oligomer growth in the diluent oligomer precipitation to form particle nuclei capture of oligomers by particle nuclei, and coalescence or agglomeration of primary particles. [Pg.268]

Of the 20 residues that react with A-ethylmaleimide in the non-reduced denatured Ca -ATPase at least 15 are available for reaction with various SH reagents in the native enzyme [75,239,310]. These residues are all exposed on the cytoplasmic surface. After reaction of these SH groups with Hg-phenyl azoferritin, tightly packed ferritin particles can be seen by electron microscopy only on the outer surface of the sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles [143,311-314]. Even after the vesicles were ruptured by sonication, aging, or exposure to distilled water, alkaline solutions or oleate, the asymmetric localization of the ferritin particles on the outer surface was preserved [311,313,314]. [Pg.91]

The 1000 A column did not show any resolution between 312 nm and 57 nm particle sizes. Shown in Fig.2 are the calibration curves for the 2000 A and 3000 A columns and for their combination. The 57 nm particle standard appears to have been erroneously characterized by the supplier. This was subsequently confirmed by electron microscopy. The 2000 X column exhibited a sharp upturn in its calibration curve close to the exclusion limit. It is to be noted that while data points corresponding to 312 and 275 nm diameter particles appear on individual column calibration curves, they are not indicated for the calibration curve of the combination. This is because these larger diameter particles were completely retained in the packed colimms, generating no detector response. The percentage recovery for these particles from individual columns was considerably less than 100 resulting in their complete retention when the columns were combined in series. [Pg.49]

Herein we briefly mention historical aspects on preparation of monometallic or bimetallic nanoparticles as science. In 1857, Faraday prepared dispersion solution of Au colloids by chemical reduction of aqueous solution of Au(III) ions with phosphorous [6]. One hundred and thirty-one years later, in 1988, Thomas confirmed that the colloids were composed of Au nanoparticles with 3-30 nm in particle size by means of electron microscope [7]. In 1941, Rampino and Nord prepared colloidal dispersion of Pd by reduction with hydrogen, protected the colloids by addition of synthetic pol5mer like polyvinylalcohol, applied to the catalysts for the first time [8-10]. In 1951, Turkevich et al. [11] reported an important paper on preparation method of Au nanoparticles. They prepared aqueous dispersions of Au nanoparticles by reducing Au(III) with phosphorous or carbon monoxide (CO), and characterized the nanoparticles by electron microscopy. They also prepared Au nanoparticles with quite narrow... [Pg.49]

Fig. 35. Size distribution as determined by electron microscopy and absorption spectrum of a CdS sample of small particle size... Fig. 35. Size distribution as determined by electron microscopy and absorption spectrum of a CdS sample of small particle size...
Molecular dispersion < 1.0 nm Particles invisible by electron microscopy pass through semipermeable membranes generally rapid diffusion Oxygen molecules, potassium and chloride ions dissolved in water... [Pg.243]

Colloidal dispersion 1.0 nm-1.0 pm Particles not resolved by ordinary microscope but visible by electron microscopy pass through filter paper but not semipermeable membranes generally slow diffusion Colloidal silver sols, surfactant micelles in an aqueous phase, aqueous latices and pseudolatices... [Pg.243]

Liegeois (71), using 400.0 ml of water, 280.0 gr of VCM, 280.0 mgr of potassium persulphate initiator and 2.5 gr of sodium lauryl sulphate emulsifier at 50°C, measured by electron microscopy PVC latex particle diameters close to 190 A for a conversion level of 24%. The model predicted an average particle diameter equal to 200 A for the same conversion level and for the same experimental conditions. [Pg.226]


See other pages where Particle by electron microscopy is mentioned: [Pg.230]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.924]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.267]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.33 ]




SEARCH



Particle electron microscopy

Particles electrons

© 2024 chempedia.info