Packed columns monoliths

Instead of packed columns, monolithic (continuous bed), analytical, or capillary columns in the form of a rod with flow-through pores offer high porosity and improved permeability. Silica-based monolithic columns are generally prepared by gelation of a silica sol to a continuous sol-gel network, onto which a Cjg or another stationary phase is subsequently chemically bonded. Such columns provide comparable efficiency and sample capacity as conventional columns packed with 5-pm particle materials, but have three to five times lower flow resistance, thereby allowing higher flow rates and fast HPLC analyses. Rigid polyacrylamide, polyacrylate, polymethacrylate, or polystyrene monolithic columns are prepared by in sim polymerization. 

CEC columns are generally made of fused-silica tubing, usually packed with the appropriate stationary phase. Today, the most commonly used CEC columns have i.d. of 100 p,m or less, with 50 and 75 p,m i.d. being the most popular. The stationary phase is retained in the column by two frits. Column designs can be categorized into two major types OT columns and packed structures, which include packed columns, monolithic columns, and microfabricated stractures (open or continuous beds). Packed capillary columns are most commonly used, as has been demonstrated in numerous papers [9-11]. They can be subdivided into three different categories columns packed with particles, columns with continuous beds fabricated in situ creating a rod-like monolithic structure, and columns with immobilized or entrapped particulate materials. 

Bubble column Loop reactor Packed column Plate column Monolithic reactor... 

Chromatographic use of monolithic silica columns has been attracting considerable attention because they can potentially provide higher overall performance than particle-packed columns based on the variable external porosity and through-pore size/skeleton size ratios. These subjects have been recently reviewed with particular interests in fundamental properties, applications, or chemical modifications (Tanaka et al., 2001 Siouffi, 2003 Cabrera, 2004 Eeltink et al., 2004 Rieux et al., 2005). Commercially available monolithic silica columns at this time include conventional size columns (4.6 mm i.d., 1-10 cm), capillary columns (50-200 pm i.d., 15-30 cm), and preparative scale columns (25 mm i.d., 10 cm). 

Correlation was found between domain size and attainable column efficiency. Column efficiency increases with the decrease in domain size, just like the efficiency of a particle-packed column is determined by particle size. Chromolith columns having ca. 2 pm through-pores and ca. 1pm skeletons show H= 10 (N= 10,000 for 10 cm column) at around optimum linear velocity of 1 mm/s, whereas a 15-cm column packed with 5 pm particles commonly shows 10,GOO-15,000 theoretical plates (7 = 10—15) (Ikegami et al., 2004). The pressure drop of a Chromolith column is typically half of the column packed with 5 pm particles. The performance of a Chromolith column was described to be similar to 7-15 pm particles in terms of pressure drop and to 3.5 1 pm particles in terms of column efficiency (Leinweber and Tallarek, 2003 Miyabe et al., 2003). Figure 7.4 shows the pressure drop and column efficiency of monolithic silica columns. A short column produces 500 (1cm column) to 2500 plates (5 cm) at high linear velocity of 10 mm/s. Small columns, especially capillary type, are sensitive to extra-column band... 

In a sense each monolithic column is unique, or produced as a product of a separate batch, because the columns are prepared one by one by a process including monolith formation, column fabrication, and chemical modification. Reproducibility of Chro-molith columns has been examined, and found to be similar to particle-packed-silica-based columns of different batches (Kele and Guiochon, 2002). Surface coverage of a Chromolith reversed-phase (RP) column appears to be nearly maximum, but greater silanol effects were found for basic compounds and ionized amines in buffered and nonbuffered mobile phases than advanced particle-packed columns prepared from high purity silica (McCalley, 2002). Small differences were observed between monolithic silica columns derived from TMOS and those from silane mixtures for planarity in solute structure as well as polar interactions (Kobayashi et al., 2004). 

Utilizing the difference in selectivity between a monolithic silica-C18 column (2nd-D) and another particle-packed column of C18 phase (lst-D), 2D HPLC separation was shown mainly for basic compounds and other species (Venkatramani and Zelechonok, 2003). The authors also reported other examples of reversed-phase 2D HPLC, using amino- and cyano-derivatized particle-packed columns for 2nd-D separation. The combination of normal-phase separation for the 1 st-D and reversed-phase separation on monolithic Ci g column for the 2nd-D was reported (Dugo et al., 2004). The use of a microbore column and weak mobile phase for the lst-D and a monolithic column for the 2nd-D was essential for successful operation. Improvement in the 2D separation of complex mixtures of Chinese medicines was also reported (Hu et al., 2005). Following are practical examples of comprehensive 2D HPLC using monolithic silica columns that have been reported. 

Current commercial silica-based columns have two important characteristics (1) they can produce efficiency similar to that of columns packed with 3.5 /tm particles and (2) they typically produce a pressure drop of half that caused by a column packed with 5 /tm particles.35 Monolithic columns have been shown to exhibit flat van Deemter curves, resulting in little loss of efficiency at high flow rates.36 As a result, high-throughput separations on conventional HPLC instruments can be achieved by increasing flow rate up to nine times (up to 9 ml/min) the usual rate in a conventional packed column. Cycle times for HPLC analysis as short as 1 min (injection-to-injection) have been reported by users of monolithic columns. Additional benefits of monolithic columns cited include... 

Reproducibility of monolithic columns has also been cited as a major concern because the monoliths are manufactured individually.34-35 An extensive study by Kele and Guiochon indicates that the reproducibility results of Chromolith columns were almost comparable to those from different batches of particle-packed columns.37 Other drawbacks of monolithic columns include weak reten-tivity for polar analytes,38 efficiency loss at high flow rates for larger (800 MW) molecules,39 and peak tailing, even for neutral non-ionizable compounds.36-38-40 Furthermore, silica-based monolithic... 

The main bottleneck in the further development of CEC is related with the state of the art of the column manufacturing processes and the robustness of the columns/instrumentation. Moreover, evidence to demonstrate reproducibility of separations from column to column still has to be established. The formation of bubbles in the capillaries due to the Joule heating and variations in EOF velocity on passing from the stationary phase through the frit and into the open tube is still very challenging in packed column CEC. A way to overcome this problem is to use monolithic columns or apply open tubular CEC [108]. Currently, many efforts are placed in improving column technology and in the development of chip-CEC [115] as an attractive option for lab-on-a-chip separations. 

The first approach to monolithic columns formed from beads can be assigned to Knox and Grant [15] who prepared a particle-embedded continuous-bed CEC column. They packed beads into a Pyrex glass tube of 1 - 2 mm i.d. and then drew the packed column to create a capillary. The particles were partly incorporated in the glass wall and the column was stable unless the column-to-particle diameter exceeded a value of 10. The success of this procedure was very sensitive to the presence of water in the original packing material. 

Monolithic silica columns, as compared to more common particle -packed columns, offer a number of advantages [24,26, 27], as ... 

Unger K.K. Skudas R. Schulte M.M. Particle Packed Columns and Monolithic Columns in High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Comparison and Critical Appraisal. Journal of Chromatography A, 2008, 1184,393-415. 

Monolithic columns with the chiral anion exchange-type selectors incorporated into the polymer matrix obtained through in situ copolymerization process of a chiral monomer (in situ approach) [80-83,85] or attached to the surface of a reactive monolith in a subsequent derivatization step (postmodification strategy) [84], both turned out to be viable routes to enantioselective macroporous monolithic columns devoid of the limitations of packed columns mentioned earlier. 

---