Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Other Column Tests

As with the design of the other columns described above, the design of a Scheibel column must be based on pilot plant tests and scale-up, The following procedure is recommended ... [Pg.1485]

The minimum temperature shown is that design minimum temperature for which the material is normally suitable without impact testing other than that required by the material specification. However, the use of a material at a design minimum temperature below -29°C (-20°F) is established by rules elsewhere in this Code, including para. GR-2.1.2(b) and other impact test requirements. For carbon steels with a letter designation in the Min. Temp, column, see para. GR-2.1.2(b)(2), and the applicable curve and Notes in... [Pg.212]

In the two studies cited above, although the SMA model was able to predict separation behavior on one type of column, this was not the case with the other column type, which yielded poor separations. Unfortunately, opposite results were obtained in the studies where SMA calculations were able to predict displacement behavior better for the monolithic anion exchange column [26] the reverse was true for the cation exchange columns tested in the later study [27]. Trial-and-error optimization on the monolithic cation exchange column yielded a separation comparable to that shown in Figure 11.4b, but required a dramatic change in pH (from 7.2 to 5). Unfortunately, the authors made little comment in the later paper about the apparent discrepancy in these results. [Pg.314]

In support of the WVDP, eight column tests were conducted at the University at Buffalo using WVDP groundwater spiked with nonradioactive Sr2+, over four durations 10, 20, 40, and 60 days. A single Kdof 2045 mL/g was calibrated from data from one of the 60-day columns, then used to successively predict the results for the other columns (Figure 5, 10-day data omitted for brevity). The importance of the specified boundary condition was highlighted by comparing results from various calibration schemes. For example, specification of a constant-concentration entrance boundary led to similar model fits but estimated Kd values that were 50% lower. Even when the recommended third-type BC was applied, efforts to simultaneously calibrate both the sorption and dispersion coefficient yielded similar fits for several combinations of parameters. Specification of the dispersion coefficient to a value obtained from an independent tracer test was necessary to obtain a robust estimate of the sorption coefficient. [Pg.133]

A column performance test is used to ensure the proper condition of columns and the stability of retention parameters. Because CWC-related chemicals greatly differ both chemically and physically from each other, the test chemicals have been selected so that their physical, chemical, and retention properties are different, and so that they elute evenly over the whole chromatogram. The use of the following chemicals in a column performance test is recommended trimethylphosphate, 2,6-dimethylphenol, 5-chloro-2-methylaniline, tri-n-butylphosphate, dibenzothiophene, malathion, and methyl stearate. The concentration of test chemicals depends on the sensitivity of detectors. The... [Pg.194]

For structured packings, tests with the Koch-Sulzer BX and CY wire-mesh packings and with Mellapak 250Y showed no diameter effect on HETP (3,19,32,33). Wu and Chen (167) state that the same applies to Gempak packings. On the other hand, tests with Hyperfil showed an increase in HETP with column diameter (168). [Pg.554]

Several high performance liquid chromatographic columns were evaluated according to their capabilities to separate and release the MIC-Fluram fluorophor. Reverse phase, normal partition, and amine bonded columns were tested. The reverse phase columns performed the separation and analysis more proficiently than the other columns. A Variarv CH-10 column was the best column from among the several ones that were tested. [Pg.127]

With most statistics packages, data that are to be subjected to a one-way analysis of variance are entered into two columns in a similar way to that seen with a two-sample f-test (Section 6.8). One column contains a series of codes indicating what catalyst was used and the other column contains the corresponding experimental results. In the first five rows, the results are labelled as being due to the use of platinum (Pt), the next five are due to palladium (Pd) and so on. The general appearance will be as in Table 13.2. [Pg.150]

Some valve systems incorporate a calibrated sample loop that is filled with test solution for transfer to the column in the mobile phase. In other systems, test solution is transferred to a cavity by syringe and then switched into the mobile phase. [Pg.839]

Chromatographic enantioseparation of chiral xenobiotics and their metabolites is a versatile tool for process studies in marine and terrestrial ecosystems [235]. In 1994, three papers focused on the enantioselective determination of toxaphene components [120,236,237]. Buser and Muller found that technical toxaphene mixtures are not necessarily racemic [237]. This observation was supported after isolation of non-racemic B7-1453 from the product Melipax which had an excess of ca. 25% of the dextrorotary enantiomer [27, 238]. The enantioselective separation of toxaphene components is almost restricted to chiral stationary phases (CSPs) based on randomly derivatized ferf-butyldimethyl-silylated /1-cyclodextrin (commercially available from BGB Analytik, Adliswil, Switzerland). So far, only a few toxaphene components were enantioseparated on other CSPs [239, 240]. Some of these CSPs are not well defined as well, and for this reason a test mixture called CHIROTEST X was suggested for initial column testing [241],... [Pg.277]

Laboratory column experiments were used to identify potential rate-controlling mechanisms that could affect transport of molybdate in a natural-gradient tracer test conducted at Cape Cod, Mass. Column-breakthrough curves for molybdate were simulated by using a one-dimensional solute-transport model modified to include four different rate mechanisms equilibrium sorption, rate-controlled sorption, and two side-pore diffusion models. The equilibrium sorption model failed to simulate the experimental data, which indicated the presence of a ratecontrolling mechanism. The rate-controlled sorption model simulated results from one column reasonably well, but could not be applied to five other columns that had different input concentrations of molybdate without changing the reaction-rate constant. One side-pore diffusion model was based on an average side-pore concentration of molybdate (mixed side-pore diffusion) the other on a concentration profile for the overall side-pore depth (profile side-pore diffusion). [Pg.243]

The process variables known to influence arsenic capacity and column performance of alumina, GFH, and other adsorbents are as follows adsorbent, adsorbent particle size, flow rate, EBCT, and water quality parameters including arsenic concentration, As(III)/(V) speciation, pH, silica, phosphate, fluoride, hardness, and sulfate concentrations. Even with a complete water analysis, it is prudent to perform pilot studies with competitive adsorbents on the water to be treated because of the numerous factors that influence arsenic adsorption. Equilibrium isotherms and rapid small-scale column tests (RSSCTs) are typically run prior to the pilot study (7). [Pg.228]

Any column testing based on an incorrect value of relative volatility can be badly in error and the column test mixtures need to be ideal (Fig. 6.1). Other restrictions on test mixtures such as toxicity and... [Pg.77]

In Table 1 we present some illustrative results taken from a previous publication (Bailey et al. 2005) where full details can be found. Suffice it to say that these are publicly available data sets of varying difficulty and selected at random. They do however illustrate a number of possible outcomes for the computational approach proposed, and so provide us with a basis for discussion (as well as an existence proof that our approach is practically feasible). The test results are found in the columns labelled A through D the other columns give details of the databases used. [Pg.236]


See other pages where Other Column Tests is mentioned: [Pg.423]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.913]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.4759]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.869]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.1809]    [Pg.196]   


SEARCH



Column tests

Other Testing

Other Tests

© 2024 chempedia.info